So, if India attacks PoK, it is not War according to your definition.
http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/biggrin.gif
Do you even know what you are talking?
Pak sent Shalwar clad soldiers into Indian Kashmir. That is an act of War.
As you can see by my neutral sites, ALL agre that Pak started it.
Can you provide one neutral link to back you up?
Actually you are correct. If India attacks the LOC on the Pakistan side, it is not an international war. It is a disputed territory. The problem with the present scenerio is that it could be an international war.
Neutral links? Heck I will quote a de-classified Indian report I have in hard copy. I will give to the dates when it was released and stuff. You can look it up then on the net.
So we agree India started the war in 1965.
It is a pleasure to stand upon the shore, and to see ships tost upon the sea: a pleasure to stand in the window of a castle, and to see a battle and the adventures thereof below: but no pleasure is comparable to standing upon the vantage ground of truth . . . and to see the errors, and wanderings, and mists, and tempests, in the vale below.
Whichever way you spin it, Pak started the 1965 war.
Gimme neutral links buddy.
The report that you claim is not “official”. Official reports are written right after wars, not 30 years later. I have read it in full.
On a different note, You guys claim win in Kargil. Here’s what a neutral person thinks of it.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-0206090342jun09.column
Can't we use logic and basic international law? International law states when a war occurs, the international boundary is crossed. Who crossed the International boundary?
I don't need a link when I can prove it with common sense and logic.
International Newspaper
http://www.gupistan.com/gallery/1/P1899.jpg
http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/hula.gif
LONG LIVE PAKISTAN
Oops. Mods. Can you edit the above picture.
Thanks!
http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/hula.gif
TAKE YOUR BESTS SHOT AT ME
PT,
That photo doesn;t have name or date.
If you think that India won this war then I have to say that India has a pathetic standard for what it considers "victory." In other words, Pakistan did not loose this war.
I don't know how Indians can say that ths is victory for them!
[quote]
Originally posted by king_sal:
**If you think that India won this war then I have to say that India has a pathetic standard for what it considers "victory." In other words, Pakistan did not loose this war.
I don't know how Indians can say that ths is victory for them! **
[/quote]
Pakistan attacked India to get Kashmir. But Pak lost land in Kashmir and Lahore-Sialkot sector.
Therefore India won.