You have to keep in mind, once the target comes below 250 runs, England will start getting under more and more pressure and will not be able to attack us as much. So it's just a matter of scoring the next 100 runs without losing too many wickets and we'll be able to show Monty his proper place.
Harmisson, Mahmood, Monty and Hoggard will all be different bowlers when ever run starts hurting them.
I think one of the ODI opening spot was meant to be taken by Shoaib Malik anyway, so we have competition among Hafeez/Salman/Taufeeq for the second spot. None of them has good scores in this series (obviously Hafeez hasn't even played), but based on manner of play and contributions other than as a batsman, who'd you pick for the second spot?
We have lost a wicket, but I am glad that the batsmen don't look too nervous or troubled out there. That always puts the rest of the batsmen under pressure too.
By the way, for the past year or so, Younis has been playing more aggressively than he used to (upon Imran's advice I think, I read somewhere) to shake off the impression that he's too slow to bat at number 3 in ODIs.
Since 1954, Pak have only had to bat last in a Test match in England on eight occasions, and they have never yet chased down a target,” volunteers Najeem. Interesting. Here’s Jenny to take you through until lunch. And, in response to several requests we’ve had to provide the required run-rate, it currently stands at 3.62.
come on taufeeq umar hit some boundaries..... 7 runs in 44 balls.. shake off some pressure....i'll be very pissed off if he goes now after missing so many balls....
Malik certainly provides what all our other openers lack: a fight. He battles it out, and doesn’t give it away. Anyone has seen him play at one down in ODI’s and in recent test matches knows what I am talking about.