New Zealand innings (50 overs maximum) R B 4 6
*SP Fleming c Kaif b Srinath 1 6 0 0
NJ Astle not out 28 35 2 0
MS Sinclair not out 11 21 1 0
Extras (lb 1, nb 2) 3
Total (1 wicket, 10 overs) 43
To Bat: CD McMillan, L Vincent, +BB McCullum, JDP Oram, KD Mills,
DL Vettori, DR Tuffey, PA Hitchcock.
FoW: 1-10 (Fleming, 2.5 ov).
Bowling O M R W
Srinath 5 0 13 1
Khan 3 0 13 0 (2nb)
Nehra 2 0 16 0
India could have stopped NZ at 200 score.
[/QUOTE]
95/1 in 25 overs mean almost 4 runs/over. Do your maths.And with 9 wickets in hand even dumb UMAIR will think that runrate will increase and its gonna be more than 200.
**New Zealand innings (50 overs maximum)** R M B 4 6
*SP Fleming c Kaif b Srinath 1 14 6 0 0
**NJ Astle c Khan b Ganguly 76 148 95 5 1
MS Sinclair c Dravid b Harbhajan Singh 78 174 126 4 1**
CD McMillan lbw b Srinath 5 9 7 0 0
L Vincent b Srinath 34 46 32 2 0
JDP Oram run out (Srinath) 4 15 7 0 0
+BB McCullum c Yuvraj Singh b Khan 7 7 12 0 0
KD Mills b Khan 5 10 6 0 0
DL Vettori not out 9 14 6 1 0
DR Tuffey b Khan 5 8 6 0 0
PA Hitchcock not out 2 1 1 0 0
**Extras (b 9, lb 9, w 6, nb 4) 28
Total (9 wickets, 50 overs, 227 mins) 254**
95/1 in 25 overs mean almost 4 runs/over. Do your maths.And with 9 wickets in hand even dumb UMAIR will think that runrate will increase and its gonna be more than 200.
[/QUOTE]
Chanda,
Do your math. Look at extra runs given by India. Don't be judgemental about others.