Re: 16,000 Kashmiris Languishing in Indian Jails on Dubious Charges
![]()
Again with the extremist accusations…run out of other outlandish claims I see?
Honestly…your statements are truly pathetic. I have never defended the butchering of any civilians, and have emphasized the importance of the return of the Pandits with virtually every post…and you have the audacity to accuse me of being an extremist. Meanwhile, you & anjjan & stircrasy and all your cold blooded Indian compatriots have never, and will never condemn the deaths of tens of thousands of Kashmiri civilians at the hands of your army…rather you will cook up a thousand excuses as to why its OK for your soldiers to kill & rape our people with impunity. You people don’t have a shred of sympathy for the plight of non-Hindu Kashmiris…but thats to be expected from shameless communalists like yourself. But then you show nothing but false pity and crocodile tears for the Pandits…when in reality you have no interest in rehabilitating them…you people would keep them in shanty towns and tent cities for the next century if you had to, just so you can justify your morally bankrupt atrocities against Kashmiri Muslims…they’re nothing but museum pieces for you people you people to exploit in your propaganda war. It’s really just so pathetic.
30,000 Muslim refugees sitting in Pakistan, another 100,000 displaced within India…but you of course don’t care about any of that.
Like I said, people like you are completely blind to the suffering of Kashmiri Muslims. But communalists like malhot will never accuse you of extremism…because apathy towards the plight of non-Hindu Kashmiris is perfectly acceptable to Indians.
And yet in 2005, Doctors Without Borders found that Kashmir had the highest rates of sexual violence against women of any conflict ridden region in the world today…with rates several times higher than in places like Sierra Leone, Chechnya, and Sri Lanka.
Who said the Indian government did a brilliant job of planning the attack? These are the same people who were caught in their web of lies when they took DNA samples from various women and submitted them as samples taken from the innocent men who were butchered as the alleged “militants” responsible for the massacre. Who knows…maybe it wasn’t planned…maybe a bunch of Hindu extremist soldiers or countermilitants just got tired of butchering Muslims and decided to turn on the Sikhs (wouldn’t be the first time in Indian history that’s happened)…and the government just decided to spin the events in their favor.
What about your logic? The attackers wore Indian army uniforms, drank liquor, shouted Hindu and pro-India slogans, addressed each other by military ranks, attacked a group that the militants/jihadis had never targeted before, at the worst possible time when it would attract the most bad press imaginable, in an attack that no militant group ever claimed responsibility for (which seldom happens), and the Indian army took it upon itself to try and cover up the events…and yet you still want to stick your head in the sand and accuse the militants.
Clinton never apologized for anything himself…his publishers simply issued a statement and removed the line from future editions of his book. But I guess your “Hindu media” just twisted the truth when it was reporting to you.
Funny how you have no comment on how even the pro-India Kashmiri politicians have joined Amnesty International and everyone with an iota of common sense in openly acknowledging that the Indian army was responsible.
This is a lie, plain and simple…just as I have come to expect from you Indians.
1996 Figures
“Leaders of the Hurriyat Conference put the [death] toll nearer 40,000”
LA Times - September 25, 1995
“Deaths alone are estimated at from 20,000 to 40,000 and more than 100,000 Muslims have been forced from their homes”
Washington Times - May 28, 1996
“The militants and some human rights groups say that more than 30,000 have died”
Dallas Morning News - January 23, 1996
**2005 Figures
**“Indian Kashmiri Muslims have lost anywhere from 50,000 to 100,000 people in the 16-year insurgency”
International Herald Tribune - October 14, 2005
“More than 60,000 people have been killed since 1989 in the fighting in Kashmir, which is divided between India and Pakistan.”
CBS News - November 13, 2005
“At least 66,000 people, mostly civilians, have been killed in the conflict since 1989.”
USA Today - June 13, 2005
Try not to lie so blatantly in the future.