Zardari's politics

Here I’ll not be discussing the governance of the present regime as every one knows the kind of incompetent and corrupt people that are ruling us.

I’d want to discuss the politics of zardari which he has displayed during the past four and a half years. He has kept the coalition in line through carrot (ministries) and stick (blackmailing). He has survived the memogate scandal, during the recent showdown with supreme court no one knew what he’d do? The consequences could have gone anyway, but he sacrificed his prime minister. No one was expecting this, with the result he has given a signal even if he has to sacrifice one each month, he will need only 6 members (till the next elections) out of his party members who number more than a 100. With no performance, sacking of his prime ministers could give him some benefit of doubt and sympathy in the next elections. No one expected him to appoint fakhruddin g Ibrahim as the CEC, no one knows what his next steps will be. Like what javed hashmi said that a Phd is needed to understand zardaris politics.

Re: Zardari's politics

Zardari is excellent defense chess player. During his defense when he found some maneuvering, he played offensive. All his 4 1/2 years spent on saving his coalition and all his efforts were focused on that. Therefore on performance side it is not a good show. He has a very genuine reasons for poor performance. Once election campaign starts, he will play these cards starting from cary-lugar, to memogate to contempt of court etc, and justify his performance based on conspiracies to oust him. To some extent he will cash these past events and get sympathy votes again in addition to cashing ZAB's name..

Re: Zardari’s politics

PML-N kept guessing about next Zardari move | DAWN.COM

**ISLAMABAD: The PPP cannot be denied its biggest achievement – confusing the PML-N.
**
**The party’s recent moves have kept leaders of the main opposition party busy in guessing what the government is up to and calibrating potential political repercussions which could follow in coming weeks and months. This was the summed-up opinion of a number of PML-N lawmakers, when they were asked to comment on recent developments on the political front.
**
**The appointment of Justice (retd) Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim as chief election commissioner was a major surprise for the PML-N. After the PPP accepted the opposition’s nominee for the post, many top-ranking PML-N leaders were simply left ‘flabbergasted’, said one of its office-bearers.
**
“It was simply a bolt from the blue when the PPP conveyed to us its decision of accepting octogenarian Mr Ebrahim as next CEC. When the information was shared with the opposition leader, Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan, who is in London, he too expressed his surprise over the selection,” said the PML-N leader.

**Earlier too, the PML-N wasn’t expecting that President Zardari would so meekly accept the removal of former prime minister Yousuf Raza Gilani by the Supreme Court, which even surprised many in the ranks and file of the ruling party, said a PML-N lawmaker from Lahore.
**
**PPP information secretary Qamar Zaman Kaira had warned of consequences in the form of protests if Mr Gilani was sent home, but nothing happened.
**
The PPP is sending out every possible vibe of its intentions of not backing down on the issue of letter, which it had refused to write to the Swiss authorities against President Zardari. At the same time, its leaders keep on signalling to hold general elections within this year to ensure continuation of democratic dispensation in the country. Both Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf and PPP’s chief whip in the National Assembly Syed Khursheed Ahmad Shah have said that 2012 was an election year.

But on ground the ruling party hasn’t made any serious contact with the PML-N or another party which could suggest that President Zardari was really interested in holding elections early.

“Frankly speaking, now the issue is not of early elections, but how to make it possible that we all move smoothly towards them,” answered the PML-N leader when asked about party’s major concern.

Elections in November, December or February, March, didn’t matter for the party, but yes the opposition was seriously concerned about the ongoing executive-judiciary clash which if not handled carefully could take any turn, said another PML-N leader on the condition of anonymity.

“We are virtually walking on a tight rope at the moment; fearing wrapping up of the whole system we don’t want to push the PPP too hard in its confrontation with the judiciary, neither we can resign from assemblies to enforce early elections because the party cannot afford to be left out of the decision making,” said the PML-N office-bearer.

Currently, another PML-N legislator said, his party didn’t know if the PPP wanted to go for early elections this year or after completing its five-year constitutional term that would end in March next year. Therefore, talks on composition of a caretaker set-up would only start once the PPP announced its plans for future election.

In response to a question, the PML-N leader said that after the selection of Mr Ebrahim the PPP would definitely demand its nominee to be selected for the position of caretaker prime minister.

A close aide of President Asif Ali Zardari told Dawn that the PPP leadership was in touch with all political stakeholders and not talking anything specific about elections or the caretaker set-up.

He said President Zardari’s overboard penchant for keeping in touch with politicians across parties and coolheaded-ness in crisis times had made it possible for him to take the PPP government this far.

Otherwise, he said, there had been many occasions over the past four years when majority in the party wanted to have a head-on collision, be it judiciary, the PML-N or the so-called establishment.

**In response to a question, the aide said nobody even in his wild imaginations had thought that the PPP would accept the PML-N’s nominee for the CEC position, but when time came President Zardari happily endorsed the appointment.
**
“We in the PPP are expecting that after removal of former prime minister Yousuf Raza Gilani, a decision which the party happily accepted without creating any fuss, this time Supreme Court will take a lenient view in Prime Minister Ashraf’s case,” he said. Now the ball is in the court of the Supreme Court which actually will determine future political course in the country, said the aide to the president, who didn’t want to be identified.

Re: Zardari's politics

he just wants, 5 year full term, which no other government is able to do it, in spite of the fact that their performance is almost zero.

He is cunning, he is playing his cards well, he didnt utter one single word against his opposition or Judiciary. he didnt throw anybody in the jail, didnt try to take revenge from this political rivals. and now he thinks that in next elections he will get sympathy votes.

which I doubt so, but only time will tell what is going to happen!

Re: Zardari's politics

When you decide that wealth is your god, you can sacrifice anything, your conscience, your family, your loyalties, your friends, your colleagues, your friends, your principles, anything for it. And when you are super intelligent, you become super efficient in it.

Re: Zardari’s politics

Based on his single digit IQ, ANYONE can make a fool out of the baboon NS.

Re: Zardari's politics

Let me demystify the phantom called Zardari. That one needs to be a Ph.D to understand him is a fairly undue credit.

His whole castle of survival is built upon two factors — spectre of military intervention and support of coalition. But actually he was primarily succored but circumstances. Return of democracy after a gap of 9 years and demise of Benazir Bhutto gave him two-in-one card of strength and sympathy. Opposition became friendly like never before and military retreated to barracks in respect of electoral mandate. That was a head start.

In order to recharge his sympathy card, he needed enemies, which he found in the judiciary. For government's survival on the other hand, he offered an unprecedented 'welfare package' to anyone who was willing to jump the bandwagon. The deal was very simple: Do whatever you want in your ministries, but stay united under my umbrella. Criticise me in public anyway you want, but vote for me whenever needed. In return was an offer of a no-question-asked, open-ended license of loot and plunder with huge 'development funds' till the party is on.

The salient feature of the modus vivendi was to frighten the nation on the rollback of the system on one hand — thus keeping the opposition at bay and the nation on its toes — and on other, having the coalition intact on a one-line agenda of making merry till the 5-year license of rule is valid.

Live and let live. Simple!

Re: Zardari's politics

What's so new about it? This is nature of every human being. Only prophets and saints were able to control their earthly desires.

Re: Zardari's politics

Zardari's politics
When educated one failed
Intermediate Standard Intellectual
facing well with
Intermediate Standard Intellectuals..

Re: Zardari's politics

Sorry, I forgot. Worshiping $$$s is nothing new for PPP.

Re: Zardari's politics

In this case, Zardari and ISI have come together and put Pakistani public in...

Intehai Sakht Imtehan.

Re: Zardari's politics

What money IK gets from USA as chandah?:)

Re: Zardari's politics

  1. The thread is not about IK.

  2. Even is the thread is about IK and he is an haram khor, does it give licence to PPP 'leaders' to be haram khor as well? Is it not the responsibility of the government to curb corruption? Oh, sorry, it is PPP's right. My apologies.

  3. Chandah is voluntary. Zardari and hawari steal my money. May all haram khors (including politicians, government servants, military officers) burn in hell forever.

  4. Do you apply this for corruption only or for all sins? "Only prophets and saints were able to control their earthly desires."

P.S. Ohhh... here I am... trying to talk sense to jiyalas again. Sorry, will try to avoid. Continue worshiping $$$s, and you'll be rewarded. Amen.

Re: Zardari's politics

Uncle Aitzaz says daddy is NOT going to be chained with Shaitan during Ramzan...He has immuninty! : Bilawal Bhutto

Re: Zardari’s politics

:omg: control your anxiety man. I know IK lost in Multan.

Re: Zardari’s politics

Mr Zardari

Mr Zardari’s ‘real’ skill

http://i1.tribune.com.pk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/414287-KhaledAhmedNew-1343491675-586-640x480.jpg

The writer is Director South Asian Media School, Lahore [email protected]

My friend Aakar Patel from India has made an assessment of President Asif Ali Zardari as a politician, likening him to “all Indian prime ministers since 1991” and later Mughal kings who “used tact and guile rather than force”. To the outside world, he appears “moderate, more so than Nawaz Sharif or Imran Khan”.
Skill, mentioned in Patel’s article, implies a capacity to be flexible. His ability to deal with diverse factors is appreciated as a gift, which again means exercise of suppleness from a position of weakness. The message is that a weak person must be pliant in confronting his rivals and those who support him. Why should a weak man be flexible?
A weak man must have multiple options in a given situation. A strong man doesn’t need many options because he can force change where change is obstructed by opponents. A weak man hardly has the ability to lay down the law; he is more likely to conform to laws laid down by others. Obedience requires constant adjustment through elasticity of approach. However, perfect adjustability also means lack of guiding principles.
There are two domains where there are virtually no rules: politics and foreign policy. No real international law exists to compel states to behave predictably. But formal law and informal principles are required in human beings to make them predictable in behaviour and, therefore, trustworthy. Politicians are notorious for not having principles. Despite laws like floor-crossing against this trait, there is enough space for them to be ‘flexible’ in their loyalties.
No state passes the test of completely predictable behaviour. The dictum that reigns supreme today is: there are no permanent friends and enemies in international affairs. Foreign policy must remain endlessly tactile (read transactional) so that there are endless options available for the conduct of diplomacy. Not even the US as a superpower can do without a flexibility of approach. Pakistan has recently suffered because it tried to lend ‘fixity’ to diplomacy by getting parliament to lay down the law on policy.
Let’s admit that President Zardari has no principles. He, therefore, has endless options. He embraced the Q League whom he once called ‘Qatil’ (killer) League to increase his majority in parliament. On the other hand, Nawaz Sharif insisted on remaining ‘principled’ by adhering to his oath that he will have no truck with the PML-Q because ‘traitors will not be accepted back’. Even the most moral supporters of Mr Sharif advised him to dump principles but he did not. In the end, even an anti-Zardari media reluctantly admitted that he was the better politician.
President Zardari is the man who can save Pakistan in two domains: in politics and in diplomacy. The army has prevented him by behaving rigidly in foreign policy till it was too late for making certain the dividends from its position of strategic advantage. Instead, he was indirectly made to face a Supreme Court case implicitly accusing him of treason. As the leader of a liberal party, he still survives as a guarantee against a ‘tyranny of the majority’ backed by terrorism.
But governance cannot be without firm regulation. It is governance where President Zardari’s strength becomes his weakness. He made a mistake with the judiciary right at the beginning and is paying for it. Judiciary is mandated by the Constitution to hold all governments to rules of governance. He has lost a lot of support in Pakistan because of the poor quality of governance by his party. Error lies on both sides: being without principles and being hidebound with inflexible literalism.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 29[SUP]th[/SUP], 2012.

Re: Zardari's politics

I can only say that Iska banday ka koi Deen Imaan Nahi

I wont waste my time by discussing about this man

Re: Zardari's politics

Give one name of politician whose deen iman salamat ho? For God sake don't even mention Imran Khan.

Re: Zardari's politics

Imran khan.

Re: Zardari’s politics

agar yeh aap ka salamat deen iman hay, to phir aap ka allah hi haafiz hay