Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

Muq Muqa at its best. Instead of thinking of the nation this pathetic character is thinking of kingship of the “born leader, the only hope”. Nation jaye baar mein, the only thing which matters to this idiots is how both these parties can loot the nation more and buy more Surrey palaces and bloat their swiss accounts. Amazing how a guy who use to sell tickets in black outside his third rate cinema now is looting the nation with both hands.

Zardari refuses to take on PML-NBy Zulqernain Tahir
Updated about 4 hours ago

[TABLE=“class: media media–left one-whole palm–one-whole, width: 650”]

Former president Asif Ali Zardari. — File photo/AFP

LAHORE: Pakistan Peoples Party Co-Chairman Asif Ali Zardari has rejected some party leaders’ suggestion that the party should abandon its support to the PML-N as it was affecting its popularity in Punjab. Mr Zardari said he was at present more interested in protecting democracy than party politics because the nation was going through testing times.
“We are supporting the PML-N to protect democratic system. I don’t agree that our policy of reconciliation is damaging the PPP, particularly in Punjab,” he told the party’s office-bearers from southern Punjab and Lahore at a meeting in Bilawal House on Saturday.
Some of the participants had expressed concern over the PPP’s policy of “overtly” supporting the PML-N government. A participant told Dawn that some office-bearers spoke their mind freely before Mr Zardari, saying the party’s reconciliation policy was costing it dearly in Punjab.
“The Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf is filling the vacuum left by the PPP. We are conceding space to the PTI. We should start openly taking on the PML-N government and its leadership on issues of public importance and play the role of an active opposition,” an office-bearer was quoted as saying.
Mr Zardari listened to their concerns, but told the office-bearers: “This is no time for such politics. The PPP will not compromise on democracy and supremacy of the constitution and parliament.”
He said he would visit other parts of Punjab soon to strengthen the PPP in the province. It was no more a stronghold of the PML-N as people were ready to take to the streets in protest against its policies, he agreed with the workers..
Mr Zaradri deplored the defection of Malik Aamir Dogar, secretary general of the PPP’s south Punjab chapter. “The late father of Mr Dogar had told him that he should never quit the PPP, but he did not follow his advice,” he said.
Mr Dogar had refused to accept PPP ticket for by-elections in the NA-149 constituency (Multan) scheduled for Oct 16. He is contesting the polls as an independent candidate with the PTI’s support. His main rival is veteran politician Javed Hashmi, who has backing of the PML-N.
In an apparent reference to Imran Khan and Dr Tahirul Qadri, Mr Zardari said: “Those fostering anarchy will not succeed. The country cannot afford the politics of sit-ins. Dialogue, and not street politics, is a solution to all problems.”
He said it was not good to put one’s own or the party’s interest above the country’s .
“They criticise our children who are Pakistani citizens though theirs are foreign nationals,” he said in a veiled reference to Imran Khan.
He said Bilawal Bhutto Zardari had decided to address a rally to be held in Karachi on Oct 18 to observe the seventh anniversary of the Karsaz tragedy. PPP workers from across the country will participate.
“Except the PPP which had a rich history of political struggle and sacrifices, all other political parties are a product of the establishment,” Mr Zardari asserted.
Some participants complained that Mr Zardari’s political secretary Rukhsana Bangash did not allow them to meet him. He said he would look into the matter.
Prominent among the participants were former prime minister Yousuf Raza Gilani and PPP leaders Qamar Zaman Kaira, Sherry Rehman, Sardar Latif Khosa, Makhdoom Shahabuddin, Samina Ghurki, Shaukat Basra and Faisal Mir.
Talking to reporters after the meeting, Mr Gilani said the PML-N could not fulfil its promises. “Protests and sit-ins are part of democratic process and an objection cannot be raised to them.”
Had the PML-N government adopted the Zardari style of politics, it would not have faced the problems it was confronted with, he said.
Mr Gilani said the PPP had raised voice against rigging soon after last year’s general elections but nobody supported it.
“We want to uphold supremacy of democracy, not of the government or a person,” he said and demanded that local body polls be held in the country.
*Published in Dawn, October 5th, 2014

Zardari refuses to take on PML-N - Pakistan - DAWN.COM*

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

And then they say PPP is not the b team of PMLN. This is not sitting well with their own supporters, best of luck to PPP.

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

Another stance of Imran Vindicated

Muk Muka

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

So any doubt left. These both parties want turns to loot country. Thts y i want to see pti in power n if they do the same throw them out as well.

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

Nawaz Sharif=democracy I hope Zardari will continue 're support even after pmln wins the next elections in 20181

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

You are totally blinded by your hate for Zardari.

Zaradri is hated, even within the PPP, but bringing down an elected govt will do no good for democracy, or Pakistan.

These protests have already caused BILLIONS in damage to Pakistan.

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

Just like you are blinded by your hatred for everything non PPP. Ask PPP people who are deserting the party because of this idiot and "the only leader, the only hope". There is a world out there beyond PPP, try looking for it.

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

It seems Zardari is quite familiar with game theory.
…The interesting part of this result is that pursuing individual reward logically leads both of the prisoners to betray, when they would get a better reward if they both cooperated.](Prisoner's dilemma - Wikipedia)…

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

It is really surprising that some people, on forums, media and talk-shows are crying that dharna is causing billions of dollar loss to the country. If this dharna is causing billions of dollars loss to Pakistan than is it faults of TUQ or Imran?

Government is in the hand of Thug Nawaz and his team of crooks. They are responsible of whatever happens to Pakistan. We all know that last election was massively rigged, something even PMLN accepts. Whatever the situation, one thing is obvious and that is, last election was so dubious that no one is willing to accept the result of last election.

So, if PMLN cares for Pakistan and want that Pakistan comes out of present situation, then why the idiot Thug Nawaz do not resigns from the post he is illegally occupying, and let interim government do everything so that a new, trustworthy, and acceptable to all, election is held.

[Well, once Thug resigns, last election should go through audit, culprits should get punished severely, and then new election is held.

Article 62 and 63 applied, proper ink is used, and best part would be, army men standing inside and outside all polling stations as observer, making sure no one rigs the election, and with order to shoot anyone who tries to rig. After that, army can also observe movement, collation and counting of votes so that no doubt is left to anyone that election result is rigged.

Later, army chief can give his words that if anyone complains that election was still rigged, he would make sure that votes audit would be done.]

Obviously, if PMLN has no doubt that last election was massively rigged, or feel that it was rigged a little, or that they have no hands in rigging, than they should not worry. They got 14 million votes in last election compared to Imran’s 7 million and PPP’s 7 million. So, any free and fair election, PMLN would win hands down (obviously if they have not rigged last election massively).

Though I do not believe dharna is causing any loss other than losses to PMLN’s and PPP’s corrupts and thugs. Dharna is also doing a big service to the nation by awaking them and making them realise their rights.

Still, even if ‘dharna’ is causing loss, then why blame TUQ and Imran for that. No one can accept an election result based on rigging and without application of constitutional clauses, as that is not good for the country, because then Pakistan would always going to have unconstitutional and rigged election.

So people who can stop dharna are those who are holding posts through rigging (they should resign) … or … someone who cares for Pakistan and is strong enough to get rid of corrupt parasites on elected posts, should step in to throw the thugs and sort things out.

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

In the middle of it all - Newspaper - DAWN.COM

There are always 2 sides to the story.

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

But sending PML(N) government because IK and TuQ want that is also not fair. It is a fact that there has been instances where PML(N) people elected as a result of rigged elections. But instead of rejecting these elections, IK and TuQ woke up after one year and started campaign against NS and his PML(N) with the support of army. Kicking out PML(N) in this manner is not in the interest of Pakistan. If IK and TuQ want change, go to NA and pursue their case there, not through hulla gulla, dances and prostitution.

Pakistan does not need a dictator like Mush who double crossed people and Sam and whose only motto was 'sub se pehaly dollar'. Let the system continue its tenure and screen out people in the next fair and impartial elections.
[TABLE="class: media media--left one-whole palm--one-whole, width: 650"]

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

So much for writing the bogus apology letter to workers begging them to stay with a party. Just to save that filthy dacoit's looted money, PPP workers aren't even allowed to play the role of opposition to balance things out. Criminals like Zardari and Sharifs would never ever favour free judiciary operating in a free and fair system, because they know the moment this country gets a strong and independent judiciary, all their looted wealth will be called back. Why do you think their supporters are eager to see the rotten system stay as it is? Simply because they don't want their criminal barons behind the bars.

But I am glad people of Pakistan have finally realised that there really isn't any difference between Zardari and Sharif, but PPP's nothing but a failed B team of PMLN. Why should people of Punjab vote for PPP aka the B team of Nawaz Sharif? People of Pakistan are genuinely sick and tired of the toxic charade of 'friendly opposition' and assuming charge of the government according to premeditated agreements and deals.

Bhuttos are dead for Punjab. They know PPP as party of Zardari and his son. These outdated and loathsome Zinda he Bhutto slogans were pulled by Zardari as well. He got the sympathy votes once, his son won't get them again. Such rubbish may keep them relevant in rural Sindh, but not in rest of Pakistan.

However, it has to be said that PPP may just be able to retain face if someone like Aitzaz Ahsan or Kaira takes charge of leadership, but this is not how the so called People's Party works. The evil Zardari father son duo are on the mission to make sure PPP's sinking ship's sinks at a slightly faster rate.

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

Its a good thing none of the PTI leaders ever worked with such criminals....oh wait...

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

Where is your logic?

I have been posting in favour of Nawaz Sharif finishing his term.

You have seen me a long time, in the last election I posted in favour of Imran Khan, only posting against him recently with his attack on democracy.

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

Excatly.

SMQ, Sheikh Rashid, Ch.Shujaat.

Pti jiyalas too blind to see the obvious.

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

There are so many more who were PPP for decades! DECADES! And then went over to PTI.

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

Not as blind as Zardari Jiyalas. Prove it that Shiekh Rasheed and Ch. Shujaat are part of PTI. Or else stop spewing this utter tripe.

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

If you stop being blind n realuze its about party policy rather than individual think its about ppp n pmln not about individuals.

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

Sheikh Rashi and Ch. Shujaat are not part of Pti, they are allied and supporting each other - and you know it.

You must be blind if you can’t see when Sheikh Rashid is on stage at Pti jalsas, that is quite obvious…and we all know the role of lota SMQ.

From Pti own website:

Imran Khan ensures PTI s support to Sheikh Rasheed in upcoming election
Imran Khan ensures PTI s support to Sheikh Rasheed in upcoming election

Islamabad: Awami Muslim League (AML) chief Shaikh Rashid Ahmed on Thursday called on Pakistan Tehreek Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan here and discussed the prevalent political situation, seat adjustment and joint political campaign in Rawalpindi.

PTI Secretary-General Pervez Khattak and others were also present on the occasion.

Both the leaders agreed that the PTI would assist Shaikh Rashid in NA-55 in the upcoming general elections where Sheikh Rashid will support Imran Khan in NA-56. Moreover, Imran Khan said that he will deliver a speech during Sheikh Rashid’s public gathering in NA-55.

Re: Zardari refuses to take on PML-N

Oh so SMQ is a lota for Jiyalas yet likes of you have the nerve throw hissy fits when same is said for Hashmi? Who do you fool with your double standards.

I find it amusing how status quo lovers so obsessively wail about Shiekh Rasheed - who in the grand scheme of things is irrelevant - yet they go all dumb and numb when it comes to criticising looters and plunders like Zardari and Sharifs. Is Sheikh Rasheed a bigger mafia than Zardari and Sharifs?

You are cry about Sheikh Rasheed, he can tag along PTI for his 15 minutes of fame, I frankly don't give a hoot about him. I rather have people moan about those who are in power and whose actions directly affect this system and the people.