Boo freakin’ hoo! She isn’t even speaking in Urdu in that video so whatever. She talks like an annoying Masi. Its just horrible public speaking really.
How about these? Are they ‘speeded faster’ as you have termed it? (What is that btw?) Next time make sure you have something reasonable to present in an argument.
Zardari has issued a legal notice against Shakeelur Rehman of Jang group for another display of their yellow "chicken" journalism.
BTW, it is interesting to see that Zardari is still going strong even with so many media trials. This is just one example. He is also fleeced regularly by media for being "Mr 10%", another folklore.
These jang group morons had always spreaded rumors against sucessive ppp governments. I hope Zardari will take out every penny from their @rses they had amassed since inception of their ****y news papers. I wonder this thread has gone so long trumpetting mirasi like music and bangrha here. However his persecuting whether by dictators or through media trial, or through these such anti-Zardari forums have made him more strong political personality. Read as follwos:
**LONDON, Feb 5: Leaked US diplomatic cables reveal that British officials initially considered President Zardari a “numbskull” who would not last long in office. **
In cables released on Saturday by the WikiLeaks website, UK officials offered a pessimistic assessment of Pakistan`s prospects as it battled financial turmoil and violence.
**Mr Zardari was elected president in September 2008. In a cable the same month, a diplomat at the US Embassy in London said the British government “makes no attempt to hide from us its disdain for **
Zardari”. The memo says uk officials saw Mr Zardari as “highly corrupt and lacking popular support, simply having benefited from his wife`s unfortunate demise.” They predicted he would be out of office within a year.
In a meeting, recounted in a separate cable, the then-head of the British military, Air Chief Marshal Jock Stirrup, told US officials that although Mr Zardari had “made helpful political noises, he`s clearly a numbskull”.
But the next month a Foreign Office official was quoted as saying Mr Zardari had done surprisingly well and the UK had underestimated him.—AP
Reports have swirled around** Pakistan **that President Zardari was married in Dubai, just over three years after the assassination of his wife, the former prime minister.
However, the president’s lawyers have now begun legal proceedings against a newspaper group that published details of the alleged romance.
The woman at the centre of the rumour, Tanveer Zamani, a 47-year-old doctor, has denied she married him in a ceremony last month.
“I have never met President Zardari and the only reason I have refrained from commenting on an internet hoax involving me is because I deemed it against my dignity to respond to such a hoax. Bloggers and journalists do not have the right to make up stories and disrupt the lives of people,” she said in an email message.
Internet stories suggest nine black goats, six cows and a camel were sacrificed during the ceremony.
Mr Zardari is threatening to sue the Jang Group, one of Pakistan’s largest media houses, if it does not retract its story and issue an apology.
“This lawsuit will seek in excess of $100m, which the Bhutto-Zardari family would donate to the victims of the 2010 floods in Pakistan,” said an email sent by a team of New York-based lawyers to the group.
"As you are undoubtedly aware, this story is a complete lie that was fostered by an internet hoax that has been ongoing for several weeks.
“Publication of such a non-sourced fabrication was not only reckless, it was malicious.”
The Jang Group is known for its strongly anti-government stance and has lost no opportunity to disparage President Zardari. No one from the group was available for comment.
Do you even know anything about sound/video editing?
More than you, I bet. Of course its not a big issue if people who have no clue don't give their take on the matters. Kinda comes off wrong, doesn't it? Peace.
Mr Zardari is threatening to sue the Jang Group, one of Pakistan's largest media houses, if it does not retract its story and issue an apology.
"This lawsuit will seek in excess of $100m, which the Bhutto-Zardari family would donate to the victims of the 2010 floods in Pakistan," said an email sent by a team of New York-based lawyers to the group.
"As you are undoubtedly aware, this story is a complete lie that was fostered by an internet hoax that has been ongoing for several weeks.
".
Now i can assure everyone this threat will never become reality...
Not impossible but more likely this is a story created by the powers that be in Pak
There is a network of websites and journalists that are well known to be in the pay off them
Actually this holds true for Zardari too, he's paying off many journalists and has hired some seasoned ones to improve his image in the media. I dont want to name one, but a very famous journalist/tv anchor, who was previously with the N league before. That journalist was shot by his third wife right after he started working for Zardari. The death had no political motive, his third wife was pissed after he divorced her. I am sure you now know who I am referring to :D
Actually this holds true for Zardari too, he's paying off many journalists and has hired some seasoned ones to improve his image in the media. I dont want to name one, but a very famous journalist/tv anchor, who was previously with the N league before. That journalist was shot by his third wife right after he started working for Zardari. The death had no political motive, his third wife was pissed after he divorced her. I am sure you now know who I am referring to :D
Very good sir.
We are looking for the new name.
I don't expect a lie from you,
So perhaps it may be true.
This story was failed and finished. جھوٹوں پر خدا کی لعنت
WHEW! I'm so glad that was just a hoax, at the same time I think it's disgusting that the paki media does stupid stunts like this to rile up the crowd. So this stuff normally happens on both ends of the spectrum? I don't keep u with Pakistani political affairs nearly as much as I ought to. Is there no defamation kinda law over there?
I think you said you did not know me. :D
On the topic, who cares if they did or did not get married. Only if this affects people/awam then that needs to be discussed.