something cannot be disapproved unless it is proved and this is rule of common sense and logic. The negative can never be proven unless positive case is proven. In this case, the positive is that she was his marhem and negtive is that she was not his mahrem. We showed you the text that a woman used to look after him when he was sick, using fan to relieve him from garmi, etc. And she did this only for three months. Now, the burden of proof is not on our shoulders to show that she was his non-mahrem rather it is your job to prove that she was his mahrem. We are not going to give him a benefit of doubt. So please tell us whether she was his mahrm or not!? Even if we assume that she was his mahrem, why did she only look after him for three months? Where was she for other times?
You say you were not born at that time, etc. Don't you have historical accounts and biographies of mahrems of your prophet? Specially those who served him and looked after him. It is very strange for you to utter such a statement!
straw man - I never said otherwise, I said it is most likley that she could be his wife. Again, how come you cannot produce a text to prove your mirza sahab's innocence and show that she was his mahrem. If she was his mahrem whether through marrige or other relation, it is ridiculously stupid to say that we have no historical account or biography or some data which tells us about the marhems of mirza sahab. This is hardly a century old incident! If you say you got nothing, then I say shame on you people for not keeping important information intact about your beloved mirza sahab.
I am still sticking to my point.
You said she is not MEHRAM. Did you say that or not? I never started discussion on MEHRAM. Its you and Raheel. Thats what I am asking provide me proof that she was not MEHRAM. I dont have GOD gifted sight which can read each every book and page and history on everything. Thats what I ask everyone RC, Aramis, Firenze that provide me evidence, proof writing so I can read and make a reply.