Yet another mission to Mars

I cant be anything but excited about Curiosity landing on Mars, but I was wondering if Mars missions are giving us any value for our money. I think there are over 3 dozen missions that we sent to mars and at least 2 dozen of them failed. Those that did not fail, gave us puny info if any. We are still not sure about the present water existence, we definitely dont have any clue of past or present life form, we are not sure if its habitable in any form or not.

we spent billions and billions of dollars on that, to learn what? Nothing more than what we already knew when Carl Sagan was alive and we probably sent out dozen of missions since then.

Re: Yet another mission to Mars

How will we know what's there unless we get there then?

Re: Yet another mission to Mars

But we went there so many times already.

Re: Yet another mission to Mars

They found men there, didn’t they? Women, on the other hand, did not need any expidition to discover them. They just invaded this earth from Venus :bummer:

Re: Yet another mission to Mars

It took 9 months for the expedition to travel to Mars from Earth ... I find it all quite fascinating.

I heard the debate over the $ spent on this expedition earlier today on the radio. On the one hand, it is money totally wasted that can used on 'cutback' areas. Then again, who knows what Mars has to offer!

Why do they keep going to Mars? Why not any other planet? Why not Venus or Jupiter?

Re: Yet another mission to Mars

^ tusi bary mazaqia ho...
oothay jandy jandy unha di gas muk jandi ay

Re: Yet another mission to Mars

Sadly we know almost nothing about oceans, yet we spend all the resources on space obsession.

Re: Yet another mission to Mars

We should invest more on the melting glaciers too :(

Re: Yet another mission to Mars

oh you can say that again!!

Re: Yet another mission to Mars

Monk bohat samjdhar ho gaye ho aap. I tend to agree with Monk and Mehnaz - let's learn about earth and invest in sustaining it before we go elsewhere?

Re: Yet another mission to Mars

its not about money when it comes to glaciers. policy is made by those in the pockets of conventional energy companies. in most countries in the world. glaciers are almost certainly a lost cause at this point.


. Aray jis ne thread att kee oos ko lift nahi and agreeing with m & m

Yet another mission to Mars

For space exploration, bigger bang for the buck is to chase asteroids for precious metal and gems mining, not sending useless missions to mars

Re: Yet another mission to Mars

If you think that will result in cheaper diamonds and hence less money you have to spend on it then forget about it. If that happens women will find another precious stone to buy. :D

PS. Yes I agree with M, M & T.

Re: Yet another mission to Mars

one word - colonization.

there are actual companies out there with plans to establish vegetable gardens on mars by 2025.

an asteroid is puny. this is a whole planet of rust.

Re: Yet another mission to Mars

Seriously? They are getting a little ahead of themselves no?

and no women is going to want jewellery made out of rust. :smack:

Re: Yet another mission to Mars

all they really need is water. everything else is "easy". the crux of it all is, transport from earth to mars is expensive. (so is from asteroid to earth btw). so if you can have stuff grown in mars using a bunch of robot farmers, it opens up a lot of opportunities.

and rust is essentially iron ore. :P steel.. infrastructure.. muahahha

Re: Yet another mission to Mars

So if they find water they actually want to grow stuff on mars. I had no idea. Is free labour enough to compensate for expensive transport?

Yes I know what iron is hence my :smack: expression. I am saying they need to look for diamonds not iron. :mad: (Just so you know I’m kidding :p)

Re: Yet another mission to Mars

Didn't they find traces that indicated there once was water in Mars.

Re: Yet another mission to Mars

yes.


Restored attachments: