Re: Would u be offended?
I wouldn't be offended at all. It's for the good future for me, her and our (Allah karey) kids.
If it came positive, o well :D
Re: Would u be offended?
well then why stop at STDs...why not a whole body physical?
Re: Would u be offended?
France does already:)
Re: Would u be offended?
yeah i would be! Although there is no problem with their demand but still yaar....
Re: Would u be offended?
lussi has a good point, why stop there, go for the physical, CAT scans, MRI's the works!
Even throw in a polygraph test for good measure.
Re: Would u be offended?
hahaha... this is a first for me. how bad do u think ur future wife/husband is if u think they need a std test.
polygraph test now that is a good idea... esp for desi gals cuz i find they do lie a LOT.
Re: Would u be offended?
Say whatever u want but if i know for a fact that he had sex before he met me (which i dont hav a problem with) then he's getting a test, this is the guy im gonna spend my life with, have kids with, and i have every right to know this stuff beforehand
Re: Would u be offended?
wese getting the man tested is of advantage. Women feel offended whereas men dont when u ask them 2 get themselves tested. But the parents should not ask the person directly, its better if the future partner does this part.
Re: Would u be offended?
I didn’t think STD spreaded from oral 
Re: Would u be offended?
^ Yes genius STDs r spread through oral sex
Re: Would u be offended?
You shouldn't be offended as long as your partner is also willing to take the test just to clear the confusion.
Re: Would u be offended?
Well, first of all, polygraph's aren't 100% reliable....which is the reason they're not admissable in court.
And as far as giving the future spouse a total physical, CAT scans etc., unlike HIV or STD's, having blood pressure or other health problems aren't contagious and doesn't put the other's person's life in danger. And assuming most people(men and women) get married by the time they're 35, how bad can their health possibly be? Now if you're marrying someone who's like 49, yes, then it makes sense to have them have a physical to make sure they're healthy...
Oh and as far as other testing goes, other than STD or HIV, one other test that does make sense is a DNA test that scans for genetic diseases that can be passes onto children. I wouldn't be offended at all if my future husband asked for that.....heck I would want to know myself if I'm highly likely to pass on some horrible disease to my future children.
Re: Would u be offended?
blood tests are a requirement in most states before getting married. There is absolutely nothing wrong w/ that. Heck you get to find out what blood group your future hubby is so that when it comes time that u might need some blood, you can ask him if you two are the same group :p
Re: Would u be offended?
Yeah, its not a big deal. If you don't have anything to hide, it shouldn't be a problem.
Re: Would u be offended?
Not everywhere. For example, Texas doesn’t require one.
Re: Would u be offended?
Not at all.
Re: Would u be offended?
I think that if u have a good relationship (if it’s NOT an arranged marriage/engmnt.) then u two shud have been open with each other in the start and told each other already. So if u trust each other, then there’s no reason to ask for “proof”…however, if he did ask, i wud not be offended.
Re: Would u be offended?
No way…it’s a disease…and if u LOVE that person, then u shud and wud want to stick by them.