Rahul India will never get a permanent UNSC seat. It would be impossible.
<< See if India or some other countries are strong enough for the seat and that isn’t provided only UN will lose its utility. Remember league of nations. Though yes, this is a tough challenge and may not happen, it will need more economic growth and real politik>>
Secondly 90% of the stuff you mentioned means very little in real economic terms.
<<This is a generic reply so I can’t answer, I see many a points are real economic indicators. GDP growth rate, New employmet opps (I only mentioned IT, same numbers are available for other sectors), Indian companies buying foreign companies, solving energy problem without dependency on oil, >>
Can you feed all your people?
<< Yes, India can, India does have surplus food, it has problem of supply chain breaking down, that it needs to rectify that, if we fail to provide food to people we may prove you right, but if are able to, we may prove you wrong >>
How diversified are your industries?
<<Valid point, though not necessay if you are good in some, Still we are looking at Pharma, Textile, Manufacturing, Food processing, Shipping, hospitality, Retail, beyond IT and the growth rates in all these been good.
How long will you maintain that comparative advantage?
<< If you are talking about IT cost advantage, than yes as we grow we have to go up the value chain and that’s already happening, that’s why chip design center is so important. large Indian IT companies are already spending big buck in product development, and that could be interesting fight to watch.
If you are talking about competitive advantage, that’s an ongoing process with on easy answers>>
<< Just to add, the design centers of GE (one out of four in world), GM, Honeywell, Sony, are in India. This is pure science research not IT. >>
How will countries react to more global trade talks and the like. That is what matters.
<< Reactions been good, Japan, Singapore, Australia, Germany, France, UK, US had trade treaties signed in last six months to a year>>
The Sensex hitting 11,000 means jack. Unless you have a completely free market economy (which India does not have) with a large private sector system.
<< You really know your stuff, In that case China shouldn’t even come in for discussoin, with no currency convertibility. Still Rupee is fully convertible, talk is not about whether India is free but how to make it more free and its opening up more and more with every budget. Private sector is bigger than public sector in all the areas except defence production. Government is constantly selling off more and more equity in Public Sector, though there are pressures from communists remain. Still the process is on. >>
Not 70 families owning 70 companies, but share holders and the like, only then does the index rating matter. This is basic economics.
<< Absolutely right, that’s where share market come into picture. I will try to get statistics, though its no longer the case. Though you seem to have read something about India, since that was the case around 10 years back>>
Textiles will not be better off because China will flood the market. The MFA lapsed in 2005 but it was extended to keep China at bay. When China enters the ball game, all textile prices shall depreciate just like they did with commodities.
<< that’s a possibility, China with its labor for food in rural areas can just overwhelm this market, lets see what happens in long run>>
I don’t have time to respond to the rest of the nonsense i read. Toot your own horn if you like. You will just be another 3rd world country like us 50 years down the road.