"Women and Children" as referred to in the media

[ButtSb]

So we see the news like…200 died including 5 women and children…there are 50 injured with 10 women and children…so on and so forth..

Why is it that the 195 who died or 40 who were injured deserve no mention? Were their life somehow less valuable?

Secondly, whenever there is a disaster…they first rescue women and children..and men are last to be rescued…its understandable about children…by why women need to be rescued first?? Why the need for special treatment?

On one hand the ‘modern civilsation’ will have you believe that women should be treated same as men, but in these kind of scenarios…its exactly the opposite?

Yeh kya baat hui??

[Monk]

Re: “Women and Children” as referred to in the media

oh brother.

I had two threads about the same issue in past 6 years.

Its like we men worth nothing.

[TLK]

Women and children need more assistance in rescue situations. Although probably now they should rescue baby men like you two before they should even rescue toddlers and infants.

[Deeba1234]

Re: “Women and Children” as referred to in the media

@""TLK""

Women and children need more assistance in rescue situations.** Although probably now they should rescue baby men like you two before they should even rescue toddlers and infants.

This..

In many situations (eg floods) there’s a greater risk of women and children dying..

[Eastern_Dresses]

Re: “Women and Children” as referred to in the media

@TLK

Women and children need more assistance in rescue situations.

Ditto

[ButtSb]

Re: “Women and Children” as referred to in the media

lol…nobody addressed the first part of the question…

secondly, women are ‘equal’ to men…didn’t you get the memo?? Why do they get to be saved on priority basis??

[TLK]

@ButtSb:9696193

secondly, women are ‘equal’ to men…didn’t you get the memo?? Why do they get to be saved on priority basis??

Simple math based logic if we are looking at the long term survival of humankind.

50 men + 1 woman + 9 months = 1 baby
1 man + 50 women + 9 months = 50 babies

You see, in the bigger picture, how soon the quantity of men becomes a useless figure. :(. We don’t need more men, we need more women.

[ButtSb]

Re: “Women and Children” as referred to in the media

human kind is already overpopulated… so we need less women…moreover men start wars and reduce populations further…this world needs more men!

[Monk]

Re: “Women and Children” as referred to in the media

@TLK

Simple math based logic if we are looking at the long term survival of humankind.

50 men + 1 woman + 9 months = 1 baby
1 man + 50 women + 9 months = 50 babies

You see, in the bigger picture, how soon the quantity of men becomes a useless figure. :(. We don’t need more men, we need more women.

lets just say, I am glad you are not a woman, boss.
50 men.

[TLK]

@Monk:9696241

@""TLK""

Simple math based logic if we are looking at the long term survival of humankind.

50 men + 1 woman + 9 months = 1 baby
1 man + 50 women + 9 months = 50 babies

You see, in the bigger picture, how soon the quantity of men becomes a useless figure. :(. We don’t need more men, we need more women.

lets just say, I am glad you are not a woman, boss.
50 men.

I already implied that 50 men plus one woman is not a logical scenario. Get your mind out of manhole