Why Pakistan had military or military like rules?
Ayub Khan ( Martial Law)
Yahya Khan (Martial Law)
Zia-ul-Haq (Martial LAw)
Musharraf (Not really Martial Law but essentially and functionally true)
Bhutto (Civil Martial Law Administrator)
Despite Awaam never really accepted these thugs and they caused bad name/reputation to country.
1- Why?
2- Who (if any) was/were behind these puppets, and cut their strings when they finished their dance?
Re: Why?
One more thing to add in your post, all these Non-Democratic leaders called themselves ESSENTIAL for Pakistan yet all of them received public spanking and were threw away ( apart from Zia who missed the train by taking a flight :) )
Re: Why?
Add NS to the list too.
Re: Why?
Why Pakistan had military or military like rules?
Ayub Khan ( Martial Law)
Yahya Khan (Martial Law)
Zia-ul-Haq (Martial LAw)
Musharraf (Not really Martial Law but essentially and functionally true)
Bhutto (Civil Martial Law Administrator)
Despite Awaam never really accepted these thugs and they caused bad name/reputation to country.
1- Why?
2- Who (if any) was/were behind these puppets, and cut their strings when they finished their dance?
Though before Ayub Khan and since 1947 no thugs were ruling? By the way including Bhutto in this list made you complete ignorant and stupid. Bhutto was handed over power in utter chaos and misery in 1971 by Yahya Khan, when his army shamefully surrendered in former East Pakistan. Bhutto was elected by majority West Pakistanis in 1970 elections. Go check the facts.
What about your kala naag, don of landan killer of other ethinicities in Karachi? the biggest chor and bhatta khor in the history of Pakistan? Shuouldn't he top the list of any criminal or dictator ever occured in Pakistan?
Read history of Pakistan and its creation then write.
Re: Why?
One more thing to add in your post, all these Non-Democratic leaders called themselves ESSENTIAL for Pakistan yet all of them received public spanking and were threw away ( apart from Zia who missed the train by taking a flight :) )
Yeah, except Bhutto, who was democratically elected leader and killed by Zia. However Zia did not miss the train, he actually met the fate what he was looking for.
Re: Why?
Most of the Pakistani generals and politicians are from the same elite class with there feudal mindset ,consider pakistan as there personal property ,there forefather were slaves of the British empire and they remain slave of the new colonialism.
Re: Why?
Though before Ayub Khan and since 1947 no thugs were ruling? By the way including Bhutto in this list made you complete ignorant and stupid. Bhutto was handed over power in utter chaos and misery in 1971 by Yahya Khan, when his army shamefully surrendered in former East Pakistan. Bhutto was elected by majority West Pakistanis in 1970 elections. Go check the facts.
What about your kala naag, don of landan killer of other ethinicities in Karachi? the biggest chor and bhatta khor in the history of Pakistan? Shuouldn't he top the list of any criminal or dictator ever occured in Pakistan?
Read history of Pakistan and its creation then write.
An absolute troll post.
So is PPP going to nominate altaf hussain to be a PM at large considering "Qatil league" is best buddies with PPP now?
Re: Why?
Did u read history? :D
Re: Why?
An absolute troll post.
So is PPP going to nominate altaf hussain to be a PM at large considering "Qatil league" is best buddies with PPP now?
Post # 1 is an absolute troll post followed by yours. Why it creates pain you know where, when real culprits like kala naag of landan are exposed? Read kartoot of killers loved by you in a thread started by CheGuvera.
Re: Why?
Like it or not troll, kala naag wasn't or never will be PM or President of the country so stay on topic on the harkaats of your "unity of federation" (broke up Pakistan in 1971 LOL) party.
Re: Why?
pretty much every party has been selfish and pathetic!... y just blame ppp? y are you holding responsible ppp for everything? everyone is equally accountable!! the only difference is ... tht some are more Evil and thn there are those who are just dumb!
Re: Why?
Like it or not troll, kala naag wasn't or never will be PM or President of the country so stay on topic on the harkaats of your "unity of federation" (broke up Pakistan in 1971 LOL) party.
o.k. Answer this question. If you don't know go back to history of breakup of Pakistan. Who was ruling in 1971 and who had the absolute power of handing over government to Shaikh Mujib? Sick and tired of spreading lies guys like you since breakup in 1971on this very crucial issue. Speak so much lie that it looks like truth. Isn't it?
Re: Why?
Who said that I would break anyone's legs if he went to east pakistan (a threat to ANP and other leftist / rightist parties) and never prosecuted those responsible in E Pakistan. But why would he as many like tikka were proud piplyas and went to jail for the "leader"?
Don't worry, I don't think a jiala like you will get it but facts are facts. You make fun of kaala naag yet can't seem to look beyond what your "beloved" ppp leaders have fed you! Now, is that a cult or not?
Re: Why?
Would Bangladesh have split off if military and west Pak had gracefully handed government over to Mujib's paarty since they won the elections fair and square? Bhutto (with or without Ayub) was the one that I understand (general reading) rejected the election results and that led to the outrage on East Pakistan.
So shouldn't you all be blaming ZA Bhutto for the dismemberment of Pakistan in 1971?
Re: Why?
Who said that I would break anyone's legs if he went to east pakistan (a threat to ANP and other leftist / rightist parties) and never prosecuted those responsible in E Pakistan. But why would he as many like tikka were proud piplyas and went to jail for the "leader"?
Don't worry, I don't think a jiala like you will get it but facts are facts. You make fun of kaala naag yet can't seem to look beyond what your "beloved" ppp leaders have fed you! Now, is that a cult or not?
For argument sake if Bhutto resisted the handing over power to Sh Mujib, again tell me who was the ultimate authority to do so? Shaikh Mujib called for NA session on 3/25/71, who started military action against Bengalis few days before Mujib's call? Was ruler so dumb and stupid did not understand the explosive situation created by Bengalis during 1971? Not only military action he had started but that dumb stupid @ss opened war on western front by bombording a number of Indian cities. (He was completely drunk and his words still echoing "aagay barho aor dushman ko tahis nahis kardo". If you don't know ask your papa or mama to confirm that. Read justice Humoodur Rehman Report to get acquinted with real knowledge of breakup.