Twisting facts to prove a point. I have female professors and I do listen to them more attentively sometimes then male professors not because of 'sex' but for a simple reason that they are talking sense. As humans we have a natural filter for something we are not interested in. For example if we have soccer world cup finals than most of the men will prefer it over any finest porn movie ever available.
We know that 'perda' is important but there can be many other *logical *:Dways to prove it.
Anyway if you will ask a Mulvi sab Sir why a man is not need to wear burqa he will defiantly say "because Man has responsibility to go out and earn money and having hijab and doing all those stuff he needed to do is hard with wearing hijab so Allah excuse a man to do perda." if you are saying about LOGIC no perda for man this is the logic NOW how come you say when a woman is going out to earn money she must wear hijab??? Logic is logic if a woman is doing something like man she must have excuse for perda too BUT Here HEY NO LOGIC WHEN IT"S ABOUT ISLAMIC LAW.(yes.......)
AWaain just trying to put guilt upon women
nothing else