yes their beliefs were vague even about humans like considering aged women as witches
their ideas were jumbled up
so the question remain unanswered that west remained without reason at some point of time in history, but still they could not have Sufisim as an institution in their society.
Wasnt the western society having their own renaissance at the same time of the golden age of sufism? I mean they too were having a simultaneous intellectual movement but so much of it was materialistic. It was a time for great works of art that the church was patronising. I don't think the sufis would have been all that interested in what was of value to the renaissance men and vice versa.
so the question remain unanswered that west remained without reason at some point of time in history, but still they could not have Sufisim as an institution in their society.
I couldn't understand the question. let's firts decide if sufism is islamic thing or unislamic. if it is islamic then how can you expect west adopt it without accepting islam?
I couldn't understand the question. let's firts decide if sufism is islamic thing or unislamic. if it is islamic then how can you expect west adopt it without accepting islam?
Its not limited to Islam or any particular religion.
The question is about absence of institutionalized version of sufism in west like we have in the form of 'Khanqah' in east.
sufiyon ka takiya. call it sarai, where people could stay, got food and learned through discussion. I don't know whether monasteries in west can be termed Khanqah.
Monasteries do have a long and big history in europe.
With the rise in material wealth, it is difficult to keep sufi traditions alive though. Some even claim that hippie movement was sufi in nature.
But essentially, I think Sufism has been influenced by Buddhists in India and hence stronger impact of monks and monstrosities and propagation of similar values.