..more specifically, the bootlegged and cameraprints copies. In this day and age of surround sounds and high defination prints, I just cannot enjoy a movie if its not state of the art quality. I made that mistake only once and watched a downloaded (from PC) version of 2012 and I was getting angry at myself while watching the movie cause i knew I am missing half of the fun because of low quality sound and print.
And today I read that bootlegged copies of Avatar were available were available as early as January. That movie is all about graphics and sound. I dont know who is going to wtach that.
I would rather not watch a movie man then to watch a lousy print.
we actually had a debate between 8 lads .. where the question was .. if a top rated movie came out or was about to .. would you rather watch it at cinema or on ya laptop ..and this debate went on for two weeks after wich the conclusion was .. at cinemas .. why .. for the same reasson you pointed out .. the quality , sound, HD etc ..and so i also agree with that i d rather wait a few days for a original HD .. than watch a pirated copy ..
See I can understand if someone wants to watch Amar Akbaar Anthony. You may not find much difference between a bootlegged version and original print. But to watch a latest movie, that also an action movie, once should pay some money and watch it in style.
and no laptop screens, they are only good to watch movies in an airplane.
When u have time to waist and no monies then pirated movies all the way :D
mind u, it has to be a good copy
I downloaded 'wanted' from graboid but decided otherwise and went and rented a blu ray version and then watched it. You just cannot see Angelina's butt tatoo properly in fine details unless its in high defination resolution :D
. . . just buy a bigger screen 
Yes I am so sad that I decided to watch a downloaded copy of 2012. I will never do that again 
so we have to watch it on TV or laptop:bummer: