why other Books were not protected??

[rvikz]

Re: why other Books were not protected??

some of the dangerous delusions about superiority about religen and holy book

In the Qur’an, Allah states that the believing men and women have permission to murder anyone responsible for the killing of other believing men and women. I know that the Qur’an is a legitimate and authoritative holy scripture since it is completely validated by modern science and also mathematically encoded with the number 19 beyond human ability. After extensive contemplation and reflection, I have made the decision to exercise the right of violent retaliation that Allah has given me to the fullest extent to which I am capable at present.

http://www.herald-sun.com/orange/10-716750.html

[armughal]

Re: why other Books were not protected??

^ the number 19 theory is of rasha khalifa who (along with his followers) is considered kaafir, since he rejected many principles of Islam....
and u bring this crap to bash Islam????

[Sadiyah]

Re: why other Books were not protected??

@armughal

^ the number 19 theory is of rasha khalifa who (along with his followers) is considered kaafir, since he rejected many principles of Islam.... and u bring this crap to bash Islam????

What else can you expect?

[Iconoclast]

Re: why other Books were not protected??

@cynic

u have nothing to prove this stand of yours else the big statement and if u cud read this thread that's what is being said.. data collection mode is exactly the same in all the cases so to cliam so and so is more accurate is at est grand-standing nothing less nothing more.........

and yeah subjectively everything is right in this world so let us not evengo there

It has not been the same. Bible had 18,000 versions, before a group of people few hundred years after jesus decided that 4 of these versions would be considered authentic. While Quran had been unanimous right from the beginning among its followers.

[The_Old_Man]

Re: why other Books were not protected??

A number of unqualified nonsense in this thread. Let's look at some:

1. @Ibn Sadique

   The message in these books is/was not Universal. So in other words these books came with an 'expiry date'.

ALL books containing data about God is Universal. In fact, the Prophet Muhammad had much more respect for the Torah+ (Old Testament) and New Testament than what most present day Muslims show. Both the Old and the New Testament indicate that they were written for all of mankind.

1. @itsme01

   In addtition, arrival of Prophet Muhammad [PBUH] was fortold in these books - indicating that The Final book is yet to come (i.e. Quran).

Pure untruth.

1. @unreal

   Quran was written while Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) was alive. This process never happened with the other Books. Other three books were simply memorized and no one bothered to write it down.

The Quran was not written up as a Book in the prophet's time but later. As to the last part of the quote, I wonder where/when the Old and New Testament of today were first written if they were only memorised?

1. 
   

   @Grumpy

   Well firstly its because the Bible is man-made. It was written afte Jesus's death and it was constantly changed......The torah again was written by humans. It was rewritten a few times by the jews to fit their own mandates.

ALL books were written down by humans, Quran included. The Old Testament is the Torah et al and was written before Jesus' time. He actually read from it in his time!

1. @Iconoclast

   Bible had 18,000 versions, before a group of people few hundred years after jesus decided that 4 of these versions would be considered authentic.

18 000 versions? Proof? 4 Versions to be considered authentic? No proof?

I don't mind for people to hold the Quran up to a higher value than other religious books but I can't understand why people would like to believe (and spread the believe) all sort of drivel about other religious books without solid proof.