Why 'No' Should Mean 'No'

I have received this post from another member via PM. Posting it here for informational and discussion purposes.


The first word a kid usually learns is “no”, either in gesture or in spoken form. Unsurprisingly, this is because that’s the word they listen most often when they start to understand words. Parents dish out this word very frequently, even recklessly, because it seems the right thing to do at that time. And if you are a parent, or about to become one, or considering to be one at any point, you need to understand how to use the word.

Lets look at an example. Two of my friends got married at around the same time. Both of them married girls who are highly educated. Both had a son as their first-born. Both kids are now about two years old. Both sets of parents live away from extended families (who are in Pakistan) so in lieu both sets of parents read a bunch of self-help books on how to raise a healthy happy baby. And to be fair, they both do a reasonable job in this department. Except with one big difference. The use of ‘no’. This is an interesting story in contrast, and may be, at first glance you won’t find anything wrong with either approaches.

In our first case, when the parents see their toddler do something undesirable, they say ‘no’ very politely and very lovingly. The kid looks at them and makes a face, they say ‘no’ again. The kid begins to make a sobbing face because he really wants to do it. The parents gesture ‘no’ again, and at this point the child starts crying. At this point, the parents either give up and let the child do what he wanted to do, or shift to Plan ‘B’: distraction. All child psychology book have the classic advice to parents that they should distract the kid. So one of the parents will get up, and offer the child an alternative, which may be a candy in the kitchen, a story book, a new toy, or anything else that will distract the child.

Contrast that with the second set of parents. When they see their child attempting to do something undesirable, they say ‘no’, very politely and very lovingly. And here is the surprising part. On the first ‘no’, the child simply moves on to something else.

Why is that?

Well, you may think that each child is different, so the second one may be smarter and that is why he understands quickly. I thought so too, and that may very well be true. However, over a period of several months I have noticed many sets of parents resolve situations involving their kids, and I believe this is a case of how to use ‘no’, properly. From the beginning, we have noticed that the second child in our example is never offered a more enticing alternative after a ‘no’. He is not offered a cuddly hug, or more attention or a candy or a toy. The ‘no’ is a firm ‘no’, and the child knows there is no point negotiating and thus moves on. The first child, on the other hand, is being programmed, intuitively, that if he makes a crying face, or starts crying, he will get something fun as an alternative, or will be allowed to do what he wanted to do in the first place. Obviously he, therefore, cries a lot, creating more problems for the parents.

The first thing to remember is, not every situation requires a ‘no’. Don’t say ‘no’ as a first reaction and then start ponder over the situation. No one likes to see their kids make a mess of their clothes by playing in mud, but if you planned to wash the clothes later on anyway, may as well allow the kid to do what he likes. If the child wants to play with a fork, and you think it is dangerous, then you may just quietly replace it with a small spoon, without ever saying ‘no’. If the child wants to play with the light switch, most likely he will get bored after the fourth try, so really no harm done. There are countless ways where you can just avoid saying ‘no’. Excessive use of the word just makes it difficult for the parents to resolve more complex situations, where ‘no’ may be the only answer. If you are not sure what should be an appropriate response, just chat with your child for a moment, while gathering your thoughts, or if your child is old enough and asks for something you are not sure about, say something like “let me think about it”.

More importantly, if you actually have to use the word ‘no’ to a two-year old, make sure you are firm. The worse thing you will do is to offer bribes to make the ‘no’ palatable. The child should be programmed to understand that crying (which is really the only negotiation tactic known to a child) is not going to get him a better alternative. A ‘no’ is always a firm ‘no’. Move on. Get busy with something else. Don’t expect a candy.

Naturally, a parent will hardly be perfect. There will be situations where you can’t be consistent, and that is alright too. Don’t be too hard on yourself if you flip-flop. You do the best you can. “Terrible Twos” is regarded as one of the most problematic age for toddlers, but interestingly your child’s early programming starts way before that and you only see the results when they are two. Try to program them the right way and all of you will be happier.

Re: Why 'No' Should Mean 'No'

The worst thing you can do is be inconsistent or unclear about consequences.

I had a very unruly 10th grade class (ok so they are 15-16, not 2, but it is still relevant -- perhaps more relevant), which is now fast becoming my favorite. They are still high energy, but their energy is used in far more productive ways. Why? Partly because they've grown up a bit in the past few months. But also partly because when I tell them the consequences of their misbehavior, they know I mean it. There are immediate phone calls home, there are grade penalties, and there earlier deadlines than other students. One warning is enough. They are responsible for the choices they make and they have to deal with the consequences. Even when they come back and apologize. I won't go back on what I say unless I realize I made a mistake or was unfair.

Re: Why 'No' Should Mean 'No'

hmm interesting...

but, i dont think this can apply to every kid...

for example, if a kid wants to turn the lights on and off, i doubt he'll get bored after the 4th attempt... he/she will keep doing it unless he/she is told off or ur not being distracted by their actions...

replacing a spoon with a fork... may work with some kids, but smart kids know the difference, and prob know where to go find the fork neways...(so ive seen)

i think sometimes parents underestimate kids... they're a lot smarter than we think and to be honest, i think most of the time they are fooling (read, ruling) parents

Re: Why 'No' Should Mean 'No'

^ yeah, smart kids are always the hardest

me thinks, as a parent u just have to be stronger than to give in all the time..i agree with firmness.. its the only way a lil kid is gonna take u seriosly

Re: Why 'No' Should Mean 'No'

^ loving and firm. I'm sure it's a difficult balance.

Re: Why 'No' Should Mean 'No'

Thanks! Good read.

Re: Why 'No' Should Mean 'No'

HAEY "pulling hair out"
if only it was so easy with my KIDS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: Why 'No' Should Mean 'No'

the kids ive seen here.. wow.. absolutely terrible, they scream they yell they curse they hit etc.. and relatives dont make things better either, they just spoil them more and more.. i know the diff btw shararti and just plain bad kids.. God help me but i cannot stand those kids and I will not let these ppl around me when I have my own family lest they come out as horrible as them..

Re: Why 'No' Should Mean 'No'

Nice post, Mehnaz! :)

I agree. Kids are innocent beings n giving them mixed signals just confuses them.

It was quite easy to say' no' for me....but thankfully now my kids know when I say it, I mean it. No more fussing over the same thing.

Same goes for lying to kids....yes adults tend to lie quite often. Like if you'll do this I'll take you to that place/ buy you this n that while they don't really plan to do so. It s just wrong .....coz you might be able to fool them a few times but in the long run they'll not trust your words.

Re: Why 'No' Should Mean 'No'

I agree with whoever said above that there are certain parents who are really scared of their kids. How and why they gave so much power to their kids is completely mind boggling.

Re: Why 'No' Should Mean 'No'

while i was in pakistan my in-laws invited a couple. They had a little boy about 5 years old and he was adorable he basically wanted to touch a decoration piece of dolphins that we had in the living room and the parents kept saying "No" each time he would try to touch it... the poor kid listened but i felt so bad..i could see the curiosity in his eyes. Finally when they went out of the room i took the little boy with me to the decoration piece and let him touch it...

i mean rather than saying "No" if its not going to harm anyone why not let the child look at what they want to see and explain to them what it is.???

Re: Why 'No' Should Mean 'No'

^ Well becaus they didnt want him to break it.. most parents will say no but their kids dont listen and go ahead anyway, and some of htem just dont even care to say no..

One time, my 6 yr old cousin was in his cousins room and he started throwing all their books off the bookshelf (this was right after his mother said to the grlz that their room is always a mess, she had to clean it up and stuff).. his cousin, whos 17, picked him up and she had the remote in her hand and it hit him in the chin by accident.. he started crying.. his phupo took him outside and she closed the bedroom door, but the kid GRABBED A CHAIR and went back.. he kept throwing the chair at the door and fortunately it was locked.. then his phupo went into the room, and was liek "dekho, mein ussko mar ti hoon!" and she was pounding on the door and my cousin was crying out as if she had been hit.. it was all a ruse to make him happy and stop crying.. but the fact that he needs someone to be beat up to be happy is really disturbing... this kid just terrorizes the whole family, especially his 3 older cousins.. it's really really sad.. No one disciplines him, for whoever gives a harsh word, there's 10 people hugging him and going "koi baat nahi beta, kuch nahi hota, uss ko mar te hain"..Everyone says he'll be okay when he's older, i really hope so. :(

Re: Why 'No' Should Mean 'No'

^^^ i have examples like that in my family
thank goodness my kids aren't like that

Re: Why 'No' Should Mean 'No'

Sara, That's scary!

I have another cousin, who is almost two, who takes "no" very seriously. Sometimes my mumani doesn't want him coming into the kitchen because things are hot and may splatter on him, and she says, no, and tho he is curious and wants to come in, he stands right outside the door and watches her, peering in. He only needs to be told once.

Re: Why 'No' Should Mean 'No'

I pray that my kids don't turn out like that.. i mean he's a sweet kid but when he gets angry, its scary, and the way everyone just lets him be like that.. its really deplorable.. i dont wanna raise my kids in the joint family system, i dont want stupid relatives around ruining my kids

Re: Why 'No' Should Mean 'No'

^ man... im gonna ruin my brothers kids bad!

u can spoil ur kids but within a limit. Teach em manners and give them discipline... and tell them that ur the adult and not them and ur rules will be followed...

kids only become terrors if u allow them to.... they dont learn on their own...

Re: Why 'No' Should Mean 'No'

Lol so am I :p There's gud spoiling and bad spoiling.. What ive seenhere is bad spoiling.. noone teaches em any manners, and even tho the mother will try, whenever she yells, someones just there to give him a treat or hug him or say "its okay, we'll beat that person up" just to make em happy and stop crying..

Re: Why 'No' Should Mean 'No'

I live about 10 minutes away from my parents and his. My kids will be incredibly spoilt (especially since they will most likely be the first grandkids for both sides).