WHY MUSLIMS

[Raj_ind]

Re: WHY MUSLIMS

@muqawwee123

complete denial by saying that it happened in certain incidents will not work in today’s world. Everyone knows the dual standards for Muslims. If that wasn’t the case their religious leaders were not disrespected and people like Rushdie hurting Muslim sentiment would not get refuge in the name of freedom of speech.

I may not be among the everyones U just pointed to, so plz let me know about those dual standards which are on work for muslims exclusively by non muslims and not otherwise by muslims towards non muslims. Plz let me know where muslim religious leaders are disrespected by non muslims and in case of some stray incidents plz try to find out whether non muslim religious leaders are not disrespected in musilm world?

I m not a fan of Rushdie and dislike him just like another muslim would. But when U have pointed finger on him getting refuge, than plz find out if something like this too happened with muslims hurting sentiments of non muslims while sitting in safe muslim and non muslim heavens? Plz forgive me but I find ur comment as irrelevent as the carricature itself, if U disagree than plz let me know why.

Western historians were so bigot that they spread the propaganda that Muslims eat children’s meat. Templers and Knights who killed thousands Muslims in crusades are still glamorised in those civil societies and disrespecting Muslim’s prophet (who always advocate for peace) is norm of the day in those societies.

I dont deny that some western historians were bigot, but can U afford to deny that historians many times more than those bigots were honest enough to earn a praise from U? and can U afford to claim than there were no bigot historian in muslim world? Plz think over it and U will find ur claims, I m sorry to say this. hollow. And I dont want to start a fresh debate here, but there are muslim attackers who are glamorised in ur muslim world for killing and looting in non muslim lands, and hurting their religious sentiments, that too in the name of Islam. Does that invite for some sweeping carricaturs? NO.

Agreed that the holy prophet always advocated peace and insulting him is a sin and againts ethics of a civil society too, but does this blame of disrespecting a religious figure lies on non muslims only? Plz let me know.

Issues like East Timur can be solved in short span of time due to intervention of UN and International community, but the conscience and efforts of these bodies go to deep sleep for issues connected to Muslim like Kashmir and Palestine.

Plz forgive me, but I again term this as hollow comments. plz let me know what goes wrong with muslim tear glands when millions of muslims are massacred by Saddam hussain and likes of him, and when millions of muslims are massacred and displaced by noble muslims in places like Darfur. doesnt that invites for some sweeping carricature against muslim atrocities? Not to talk about in countries like Pakistan where innocent muslims are branded as islamic terrorists and shot. Issues which needs to draw sweeping carricatures could be countless, but only if U come out of ur usual pre-concieved notions against non muslims.

There is certainly discrimination. One should look at things with broad perspective without being partial.

I agree about discrimination, but done by which section of this society? **One should look at things with broad perspective without being partial.

**Peace.