WHY MUSLIM SHOULD CONVERT TO HINDUISM?

Neo-Hindu site on geocities fleeting site has a propoganda thrown at muslims as a last attempt to ditch before running for cover ,knowing very well HOW MUCH THINGROUND THEY STAND ON!!!

http://www.geocities.com/fmqu/Become.html
http://www.geocities.com/fmqu/Become.html

Why a Muslim should convert to Hinduism?

There are multiple issues on the above question.

1. Who is a Muslim?

2. Why she/he should convert?

3. Why Hinduism?


1. Who is a Muslim?

Muslim is a person by birth or by choice became a follower of Islam.

Islam is a set of beliefs propounded by Mohammad who claimed the angel
Gibriel told him the Quran, the word of God. The compilation of such
verses from Mohammad’s mouth became Quran as it exists today. As said in
Quran itself, there are two versions of Quran, the one exists in heaven
and another that exists in earth. The one exists in earth is compiled by
Khalifa Uthman.

Muslims are told these things from their birth till they die. Quran and
the story of Mohammad (called Hadiths) are expounded day in day out in
the Muslim media. Even scientists are writing that Quran has scientific
truths that an illiterate Mohammad could not have known. And their
writings are constantly published in the media as the proof of “God’s
Work”.

Islam was spread by both sword and teachings. Miracle workers called
sufi saints spread Islam in places where other religions like Hinduism
reigned. Muslim Kings captured vast areas of earth and converted the
people into Islam. Except in India, wherever Muslim kings ruled, it
became Islamic. Even in India, Bengal, Kashmir, Sindh, Punjab,
Afghanistan became majority Muslim due to the forcible conversion of
locals into Muslims. In other places, where Muslim kings were not there,
the sufi saints and Muslim preachers converted the local people into
Muslims.

History is history. Some of the forefathers of the current generation
converted by preaching and some others converted by force. There is no
need to go back to that and feel bitter about it. Many Hindus feel
bitter about this. They view the Muslims are brothers who started
fighting Hindus just because the remaining did not convert to Islam. And
Muslims think that Hindus are still in old “polytheist” ways and they
need to convert to Islam.

Make no mistake about this. Muslims strongly feel that their religion
is the correct one and Hinduism is primitive religion. And Hindus feel
that Hinduism is a “natural” religion, which did not have a human
founder. And Many Hindus believe that all the rivers lead to the same
ocean and hence there is no need to fight over which river to take to
reach the ocean.

2. Why should a Muslim convert?

Taking an objective view of the history, we see that every religion
arises out of necessity of the times. And humans have an uncanny ability
to swim with the times.

Those who adjust and live with the times survive and those who refuse
to accept the times, they die. Those who accept the times and adopt to
the environment survive to the next generation. Same is the case with
religions and ideas.

Why there is no one supporting a flat earth society? When the world did
not accept that the earth is round, if you had said earth is round, you
would probably be called a madman and probably die in a mental asylum
too.

When the world can be seen from a satellite, there is no need to
theorize about the roundness of the earth. It is round. We can see it.
Once we see it there is no confusion. Anyone who still thinks that earth
is flat IS a madman. And he would probably die in a mental asylum too.

You can say it is a survival of the concepts. Any concept that refutes
the current human knowledge is doomed to be a failure and the people
upholding that will probably be condemned as well.

On the other hand there are some successful concepts that are time
tested and time honoured. The people who uphold those ideas live longer
and live prosperously. They pass on their knowledge to their children
and to their children and the community prospers.

One such concept is respecting the ideas of others. It may look self
contradictory, but looking closely, we see the obvious thing about that.

One may argue, if I respect the idea of the other person, what will
happen to my ideas? My ideas may not receive that much importance. But
looking closely, we see that by respecting the other person’s ideas, we
kind of make the other person respect our ideas. By making “respect for
other person’s opinion” as the cardinal principle of the society, we
redeem everyone in the society.

That is the bottom line of civilization. When we call somebody
“civilized” we assume that person is able to argue an issue without
becoming angry about that issue.

“Civilized” is a two-person work. There cannot be one person talking
civilized and another person attacking him with a club. There should be
a basis on which both the persons can talk to each other.

Let us assume that one person’s religion says “Respect everyone and
never use violence”. And another person’s religion says “Never have
friendship with anyone who does not believe in our religion. And kill
him wherever you find him”. Where is the common ground on which both the
persons can talk to each other?

Often I am faced with this question. Does a terrorist have human
rights?

A terrorist is one who uses terror and random violence and disrespect
of other people’s human rights to further his aim. When he is captured,
he pleads that to the captor, “I am a terrorist. I terrorize people.
That is what I do. But you are a respector of human rights and respect
everyone and you should not use violence. So you should not harm me”

What should the captor do?

The reality is lot different from the hypothetical scenerio I presented.
When the terrorist is on prowl, he makes the other person also little
bit terrorist. Because, the other person’s survival as a human being
depends on it. Whenever he finds this terrorist, most likely he will
kill this terrorist than to reason with him. And reasoning with him is
futile. And his reasoning is based on different set of rules for both
the people.

This is the same case with the nations, religions and ideas. Certain
civilizations can survive only if the terrorists are cleaned from the
society. If everyone takes up arms against everyone else for the
difference of opinion, then the future of humanity is at stake.

Our human body contains so many cells. All the cells are identical in
core but the functions are different. The dna inside neuron is 100% no
different from the dna of a skin cell. But the cells do different
functions. But also in our body there are so many different organisms
live. Small bacteria in our intestines and in various parts of the body
provide benevolent work. They kind of live in symbiosis. Some are good
parasites. And they are needed for the body. But when another virus
which is not helpful for the body arrives inside a human body, there
could be only one answer. Either the virus dies or the human body dies.
If the virus dies, the human body will remember the virus. And will
attack if the virus strikes again. If the human body dies, the virus
also dies along with that. (Except when the virus is spread to another
human body before or after the human body dies)

A civilization also is like a human body. When the good ideas from one
civilization comes to another civilization, both the civilizations
benefit. If bad ideas comes to another civilization, then that
civilization falls ill.

It is not very difficult to see which civilization is prospering and
which civilization is falling ill and which civilization is internally
collapsing.

Again, there is a need for talking to Muslims. We have Buddhists of
Burma and Laos who are inward looking and closed societies. They neither
inflict pain on others nor other people inflict pain on them. The
influence of Communism in Cambodia had produced Pol Pot who wanted to
created a perfect society and went on to kill 1 million Cambodians in
trying to reach a society like that. He destroyed Television sets,
radios, any trace of industrial activity, and knowledge associated with
western civilization or western industrial products. He killed all the
engineers and doctors and destroyed beaurocracy. But he was not invading
other countries and trying to impose his rules on others.

But the Islamic ideology is different. The pure interpreters of Islamic
ideology say that Television sets, Music tapes are to be banned by the
Islamic state. And the interpreters who study Quran and Sunnah for many
years come out of the schools and insist that the whole world is to be
converted into Islamic state. And they teach these things to the people
who come to mosques looking for sprituality.

So, in one way, Islam is standing against modernity. It is apt to
remember what Turkey did to Mullahs. The General Kemal Ataturk who was a
great turkish patriot, put all the mullahs in one ship and sent them to
Mecca on a pilgrimage and bombed the ship to kill all the Mullahs. Now
Turkish nation is the most progressed nation among the Islamic
countries. But the problem is that right now the new breed of Mullahs in
Turkey who are threatening the nation in the name of Islam. Since the
people did not convert to some other religion, the people continue to
teach the Islamic teachings to the children and the children carry the
burden again.

That is why the Muslims need to convert out of Islam. You may think that
my child is in US and no way my boy is going to become a terrorist or my
girl is going to become a fourth wife of an old man. But the pervasive
internet is going to address your boy as he identifies himself as a
Muslim. Even if the current generation is brilliant and you have taught
the values of life and respect for everyone’s opinion, what about the
children of your children?

Before that, we have to talk about God. God is the creator of this
infinite universe. There may be even multiple universes. Theruniverse.
There may be even multiple universes. There are million and million
civilizations possibly living in million and million planets like our
earth. Why on the world th

Can the great lord of the universe be fully described in just one book?
Is it possible for anyone to think that he could know the mind of the
Lord of the universe by reading one book? Would he be personally angry
at someone not worshipping him? would the God limit Himself in such a
way that he could never speak again to another human for all eternity to
come? Will not he be magnanimous that he can be praised and worshipped
in many different ways?

Sufis understood these things. Though they were Muslims and converted
people from many different religions into Muslims, they spoke about
becoming one with the Lord, and talked about realizing Lord in our soul.
The sufi teachings are essentially the knowledge gained by the Muslims
from the Hindus and spread in the Muslim world. For that work, the sufis
were often skinned alive by the Muslim Kings and Muslim Mullahs.

Ultimately, it is the traditional understanding of Quran which won the
battle again and again. Because Quran is not ambiguous in its calls to
kill the infidels. And that is what is being read by every Christian,
Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh and Jain in the world. And certainly he is going
to think that Islam is a violent religion and Muslims are violent
people.

And the things happening in the world just prove that true. And when
the critical point breaks and other religious people’s tolerance cross
the limits, there would be a massacre and that would not check whether
one Muslim is a namesake Muslim or enlightened Muslim. The world already
had started identifying a Muslim with a terrorist. And that is a danger
sign.

Sooner the Muslim convert, it is better for him and for his children.

3. Why Hinduism?

Hinduism is not the actual name of this religion. The actual name is
“Sanathan Dharma”. This means Eternal Law. This is the name that Hindus
identified themselves for thousands of years.

The saints of Sanathan Dharma say that the Lord is incomprehensible. No
one can define nor one can authoritatively say that he understood who is
Lord and what is God. But only a tiny piece of that divinity can be
understood by anyone.

For example, take yourself. You are a son of your father and mother.
Husband to your wife and father to your son and daughter. You are a
grandfather to your grandchildren. You are a worker of your company and
friend of your friends. But who are you? And how many are you? You know
you are one, but you speak differently with your son and you speak
differently with your grand child. it is as if two different persons.

If even a humble mortal like you can be seen and act in so many
different ways, what about the Lord of the universe? We know he is one,
but he is too big to be comprehended by anyone. And he is different for
different people. For someone who wants education, she is saraswathy,
the lord of education. For some one who wants money she is lord of
wealth, lakshmi. For someone who wants power, she is Lord of energy,
Sakthi. That is in one level where a man looks for material things.

In another level, the learned and thinkers know the Lord is one and
they constantly teach the less learned about the respect for everyone’s
beliefs. But more higher a person moves up in sprituality, he
understands the most complex nature of the realization. And the
realization can neither be discoursed nor it can be explained. It is
like explaining to a person about sweetness. I know sugar is sweet. If I
am forced to explain what is sweetness of sugar to another person who
never experienced sugar or any sweet, how will I explain? Can one
explain at all? That is the same thing about realization of Lord. It had
to be experienced. It cannot be explained. But you can explain where to
find the sugar and how to eat the sugar. That exactly what all the
Sanatana Dharma books explain. For example, Gita explains the yogas, the
ways, to realize the Lord.

But again, if someone higher in sprituality explains his understanding
to someone who is not able enough too understand it, the student most
likely will corrupt the teachings and reduce the teachings to a
nonsense. That is the problem the Saints of Sanatana Dharma keep
explaining to the people. Just like material education, spritual
education should also be gradual. You cannot explain Einstein’s theory
to a Kindergarten student. So, you cannot teach the higher truth to the
novice. Some children are genius who could understand the Einstein’s
theory even in primary school. Sameway, some gifted religiuos people can
realize the Lord even at very young age or even with out the teacher.

That is exactly what Hinduism does. By removing the religion from the
material things and political things, it raises the realization of the
Lord into another educational area.

But other people who did not know the above things associated castes
with Hinduism and explained the world over that Hinduism is bad. Slavery
was in all Islamic and Christian lands but no one associates slavery
with Islam or christianity. Casteism is a political constitution of
ancient India, and Sanatana Dharma was a religion of the India and the
world. There is no need to confuse both.

Hindu Saints did talk about the functions of the society. Teachers
(brahmins), Warriors(kshatriyas), Traders(Vaishyas) and Sudras(workers)
exist in every society irrespective of whether that is America or
Pakistan. In ancient India, the Hindu saints codified the rules for
these people. How a warrior should behave? Why teachers(Brahmins) should
not have any properties? What are the obligations of the traders? These
are the issues some of them were converted to enforceable rules and some
of them were guiding principles. The modern India does not care about
castes. It slowly transforming from a hereditory caste structure to a
individualist society.

Hence there is no need to ask, “If I become Hindu, will I become a
sudra?” Millions of Hindus do not accept caste and millions of Hindus do
not have caste. Now people intermarry in India among the castes and
religions. Hence a simple declaration that “I am a Sanathani” itself is
enough to liberate you.

Being a Hindu entitles many things on you. You should educate your
children in modern sciences and encourage them into analytical thinking.
You should respect everyone else’s opinion and listen to them really.
You should help others to improve their life. You should do what is your
Dharma. That is if you are a student in college, you should really be a
student and nothing else ( I mean no politics and side-business etc) If
you are taking up work as an employee, you should do the work completely
with the satisfaction of yourself and everyone.

All the best and Best Wishes.

Thanks to Ayesha Ali in the newsgroups
Even the refence to Ayesha Ali make me grin in idiocy of Rss hindu Mahasabha ppl. who have sites like Sword Of truth(ironicaly lies),Hindu Net,Hindu Org. & milions of web sites with no substance only HOT AIR.

Ill comment on this wrote up seperately giving muslims here to se the fallacy & ignorence at its most contrasted by the true believers & as they say ppl. who are in the trencheses not reporting .


barque(bijli) yoon akadti hai apne karname pe ke
jaise phir naya hum aashiyaan bana nahi sakteœþM267G‡S_—<

[This message has been edited by Azad Munna (edited March 21, 2001).]

[QUOTE]
Originally posted by A
 Islam was spread by both sword and teachings. Miracle workers called
sufi saints spread Islam in places where other religions like Hinduism
reigned. Muslim Kings captured vast areas of earth and converted the
people into Islam. Except in India, wherever Muslim kings ruled, it
became Islamic. Even in India, Bengal, Kashmir, Sindh, Punjab,
Afghanistan became majority Muslim due to the forcible conversion of
locals into Muslims. In other places, where Muslim kings were not there,
the sufi saints and Muslim preachers converted the local people into
Muslims.
---->>>SMARTIE CHAPPIE,AKBAR RULED OVER GREATER INDIA BESIDES ALL READY ENUMERATED BENGAL,SINDH,PUNJAB & KASHMIR, Then WHY DID U.P. BIHAR, MADHYA PRADESH,RAJASTHAN,MAHARASHTRA,ANDHRA PRADESH DID NOT BECOME MUSLIM MAJORITY ,

B/C MUSLIM KINGS WERE NOT IN THE BUSINESS OF ISLAM.
 History is history. Some of the forefathers of the current generation
converted by preaching and some others converted by force. There is no
need to go back to that and feel bitter about it. Many Hindus feel
bitter about this. They view the Muslims are brothers who started
fighting Hindus just because the remaining did not convert to Islam. And
Muslims think that Hindus are still in old "polytheist" ways and they
need to convert to Islam.

 Make no mistake about this. Muslims strongly feel that their religion
is the correct one and Hinduism is primitive religion. And Hindus feel
that Hinduism is a "natural" religion, which did not have a human
founder.
And Many Hindus believe that all the rivers lead to the same
ocean and hence there is no need to fight over which river to take to
reach the ocean.
 
---->>>YOUR THEORY THAT WHERE EVER MUSLIM KING WAS, BECAME ISLAMIC ,IN SOUTH TIPU SULTAN,HYDER ALI WERE NO LESS THAN MOGHUL IN THERE GRANDEUR ,STILL SOUTH REMAIN HINDU ,NOT BECAUSE HINDU WERE MORE ORTHODOX OR ADAMANT ,B/C OF NO AGENDA ON PART OF TIPU OR HYDER ALI TO CONVERT TO ISLAM BY FORCE.

YOU MAY DO WHATEVER IRRARIONAL LOGIC ,THERE IS NO EVIDENCE IN INDIAN MUSLIM RULE CONVERSION BY ROYAL EDICT.

INDIA WITH OR WITHOUT 1000 YRS MUSLIM KINGS WOULD BE AS MANY ISLAMIC FOLLOWERS IRRESPECTIVE OF KINGS DIRECT INVOLVEMENT.

KINGS BUILT TAJ,MARRIED HINDU ,DRANK SHARAB,1/2 THERE PROGENY JEHANGIR,SHAHJEHAN,AURANGZEB,BAHADUR SHAH HAD HINDU ANCESTERS BLOOD & GENE IN THEM ,
 2. Why should a Muslim convert?

 Taking an objective view of the history, we see that every religion
arises out of necessity of the times. And humans have an uncanny ability
to swim with the times.
----->>> THEN ISNT IT PARADOX ADMITTING THE NEED TO HAVE CONTEMPORARY RELIGION FOR MODERN TIME YET CLINGING TO 6000 YR OLD PRIMITIVE ANCIENT VESTIGESES OF ATAVISTIC REMAINS OF BYGONE TRIBALISM CALLED HINDUISM?????????
 Those who adjust and live with the times survive and those who refuse
to accept the times, they die. Those who accept the times and adopt to
the environment survive to the next generation. Same is the case with
religions and ideas.

 Why there is no one supporting a flat earth society? When the world did
not accept that the earth is round, if you had said earth is round, you
would probably be called a madman and probably die in a mental asylum
too.
---->>>SHAME ON INDIAN STUDENTS BEING STUDIOUS DO NOT KNOW THAT WHEN COLUMBUS SAILED FOR AMERICA HE CONSULTED MOORISH LIBRARIES OF ALHAMBRA ,CARDOVA UNIVRSITY IN SPAIN --LEFT OVER AFTER SPANISH INQUISITION BUTCHERED MUSLIM AWAY FROM THERE AT HEIGHT OF FLOURISHING CIVILIZATION OF ISLAM AT ITS ZENITH IN SCIENCE INDUSTRY ARTS & COMMERCE.
IT WAS ISLAMS CONCEPT OF ROUND WORLD THAT GAVE COURAGE TO COLUMBUS FROM FEAR OF 'DROPPING OFF THE EDGE OF THE EARTH' AS BELIEVED BY NON ISLAMIC & ALL RELIGION & CIVILIZATION PRIOR TO 1500 YRS AGO BEFORE MOHOMMEDS MESSAGE!!!!
 When the world can be seen from a satellite, there is no need to
theorize about the roundness of the earth. It is round. We can see it.
Once we see it there is no confusion. Anyone who still thinks that earth
is flat IS a madman. And he would probably die in a mental asylum too.

 You can say it is a survival of the concepts. Any concept that refutes
the current human knowledge is doomed to be a failure and the people
upholding that will probably be condemned as well.

 On the other hand there are some successful concepts that are time
tested and time honoured. The people who uphold those ideas live longer
and live prosperously. They pass on their knowledge to their children
and to their children and the community prospers.

 One such concept is respecting the ideas of others. It may look self
contradictory, but looking closely, we see the obvious thing about that.

One may argue, if I respect the idea of the other person, what will
happen to my ideas? My ideas may not receive that much importance. But
looking closely, we see that by respecting the other person's ideas, we
kind of make the other person respect our ideas. By making "respect for
other person's opinion" as the cardinal principle of the society, we
redeem everyone in the society.

That is the bottom line of civilization. When we call somebody
"civilized" we assume that person is able to argue an issue without
becoming angry about that issue.

 "Civilized" is a two-person work. There cannot be one person talking
civilized and another person attacking him with a club. There should be
a basis on which both the persons can talk to each other.

 Let us assume that one person's religion says "Respect everyone and
never use violence". And another person's religion says "Never have
friendship with anyone who does not believe in our religion. And kill
him wherever you find him". Where is the common ground on which both the
persons can talk to each other?

 Often I am faced with this question. Does a terrorist have human
rights?

 A terrorist is one who uses terror and random violence and disrespect
of other people's human rights to further his aim. When he is captured,
he pleads that to the captor, "I am a terrorist. I terrorize people.
That is what I do. But you are a respector of human rights and respect
everyone and you should not use violence. So you should not harm me"

 What should the captor do?

The reality is lot different from the hypothetical scenerio I presented.
When the terrorist is on prowl, he makes the other person also little
bit terrorist. Because, the other person's survival as a human being
depends on it. Whenever he finds this terrorist, most likely he will
kill this terrorist than to reason with him. And reasoning with him is
futile. And his reasoning is based on different set of rules for both
the people.

 This is the same case with the nations, religions and ideas. Certain
civilizations can survive only if the terrorists are cleaned from the
society. If everyone takes up arms against everyone else for the
difference of opinion, then the future of humanity is at stake.

 Our human body contains so many cells. All the cells are identical in
core but the functions are different. The dna inside neuron is 100% no
different from the dna of a skin cell. But the cells do different
functions. But also in our body there are so many different organisms
live. Small bacteria in our intestines and in various parts of the body
provide benevolent work. They kind of live in symbiosis. Some are good
parasites. And they are needed for the body. But when another virus
which is not helpful for the body arrives inside a human body, there
could be only one answer. Either the virus dies or the human body dies.
If the virus dies, the human body will remember the virus. And will
attack if the virus strikes again. If the human body dies, the virus
also dies along with that. (Except when the virus is spread to another
human body before or after the human body dies)

 A civilization also is like a human body. When the good ideas from one
civilization comes to another civilization, both the civilizations
benefit. If bad ideas comes to another civilization, then that
civilization falls ill.

 It is not very difficult to see which civilization is prospering and
which civilization is falling ill and which civilization is internally
collapsing.

 Again, there is a need for talking to Muslims. We have Buddhists of
Burma and Laos who are inward looking and closed societies. They neither
inflict pain on others nor other people inflict pain on them. The
influence of Communism in Cambodia had produced Pol Pot who wanted to
created a perfect society and went on to kill 1 million Cambodians in
trying to reach a society like that. He destroyed Television sets,
radios, any trace of industrial activity, and knowledge associated with
western civilization or western industrial products. He killed all the
engineers and doctors and destroyed beaurocracy. But he was not invading
other countries and trying to impose his rules on others.

 But the Islamic ideology is different. The pure interpreters of Islamic
ideology say that Television sets, Music tapes are to be banned by the
Islamic state. And the interpreters who study Quran and Sunnah for many
years come out of the schools and insist that the whole world is to be
converted into Islamic state. And they teach these things to the people
who come to mosques looking for sprituality.

So, in one way, Islam is standing against modernity. It is apt to
remember what Turkey did to Mullahs. The General Kemal Ataturk who was a
great turkish patriot, put all the mullahs in one ship and sent them to
Mecca on a pilgrimage and bombed the ship to kill all the Mullahs. Now
Turkish nation is the most progressed nation among the Islamic
countries. But the problem is that right now the new breed of Mullahs in
Turkey who are threatening the nation in the name of Islam. Since the
people did not convert to some other religion, the people continue to
teach the Islamic teachings to the children and the children carry the
burden again.

That is why the Muslims need to convert out of Islam. You may think that
my child is in US and no way my boy is going to become a terrorist or my
girl is going to become a fourth wife of an old man. But the pervasive
internet is going to address your boy as he identifies himself as a
Muslim. Even if the current generation is brilliant and you have taught
the values of life and respect for everyone's opinion, what about the
children of your children?

 Before that, we have to talk about God. God is the creator of this
infinite universe. There may be even multiple universes. Theruniverse.
There may be even multiple universes. There are million and million
civilizations possibly living in million and million planets like our
earth. Why on the world th

 Can the great lord of the universe be fully described in just one book?
Is it possible for anyone to think that he could know the mind of the
Lord of the universe by reading one book? Would he be personally angry
at someone not worshipping him? would the God limit Himself in such a
way that he could never speak again to another human for all eternity to
come? Will not he be magnanimous that he can be praised and worshipped
in many different ways?

 Sufis understood these things. Though they were Muslims and converted
people from many different religions into Muslims, they spoke about
becoming one with the Lord, and talked about realizing Lord in our soul.
The sufi teachings are essentially the knowledge gained by the Muslims
from the Hindus and spread in the Muslim world. For that work, the sufis
were often skinned alive by the Muslim Kings and Muslim Mullahs.

 Ultimately, it is the traditional understanding of Quran which won the
battle again and again. Because Quran is not ambiguous in its calls to
kill the infidels. And that is what is being read by every Christian,
Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh and Jain in the world. And certainly he is going
to think that Islam is a violent religion and Muslims are violent
people.

 And the things happening in the world just prove that true. And when
the critical point breaks and other religious people's tolerance cross
the limits, there would be a massacre and that would not check whether
one Muslim is a namesake Muslim or enlightened Muslim. The world already
had started identifying a Muslim with a terrorist. And that is a danger
sign.

 Sooner the Muslim convert, it is better for him and for his children.
 
---->>>YOU HAVE JUST TALKED ABOUT ALL THE THINGS A HINDU THINKS ABOUT MUSLIM AS THE REASON TO LEAVE.WHAT IF IT DAWNS UPON YOU THAT YOU HAVE BEEN FED ON STEROIDS IN YOUR CATTLE FEED FOR PURPOSE OF HATING ISLAM-MUSLIM PAKISTAN.JUST STEROID IS ONLY USEFULL IN IMMEDIATE GAIN OF FATTENING THE CATTLE & POULTRY ,THIS VENOM OF PURPOSE FULL CALLING TERRORIST,AS IF ISLAM COULD BE HELD IN A FAMILY FOR 15 GENERATIONS BY FORCE .

THE NOMADIC NATURE OF EUROPE MID EAST & ALL CIVILIZATION WERE IMMORAL IS ONLY IN THE EYES OF FEEBLE COWARD,DRAVIDIAN WHO DIDNT DARE TO LEAVE ITS VILLAGE FOR FEAR OF RAVAN ,HANUMAN,& DEMONS OF KALI ,GANESH ,.ITS NATURE OF HUMAN & ALL ALIVE BEINGS TO MIGRATE FOR WEATHER LIKE MIGRATORY BIRDS TO FLORIDA FROM CANADA, TO AUSTRALIA BEING SETTLEDV BY OUTSIDERS & ABORGINES STILL LIVING WITH KANGROOSE LIKE HINDUS IN INDIA,
IN SHORT I JUST LIKE TO SAY ,I CAN CHALLENGE ANY HINDU TO TAKE EACH ASPECT OF ISLAM FROM JEHAD TO QURBANI ,ZAKAT TO HAJ ,IF YOU CAN COMPREHEND ,I M WILLING TO HELP YOU ,BUT DONT GO ABOUT DENMONSTRATING THE IMBECILITY OF YOUR SHRUNKEN BRAIN ,MAY BE B/C LACK OF EXPOSURE TO DIVERSITY,MIGRATION &COMPREHENSIBILITY.YOU NOT ISLAM ESSENCE TO CRITICIZE IT MEANINGFULLY.

 3. Why Hinduism?

 Hinduism is not the actual name of this religion. The actual name is
"Sanathan Dharma". This means Eternal Law. This is the name that Hindus
identified themselves for thousands of years.

 The saints of Sanathan Dharma say that the Lord is incomprehensible. No
one can define nor one can authoritatively say that he understood who is
Lord and what is God. But only a tiny piece of that divinity can be
understood by anyone.

 For example, take yourself. You are a son of your father and mother.
Husband to your wife and father to your son and daughter. You are a
grandfather to your grandchildren. You are a worker of your company and
friend of your friends. But who are you? And how many are you? You know
you are one, but you speak differently with your son and you speak
differently with your grand child. it is as if two different persons.

 If even a humble mortal like you can be seen and act in so many
different ways, what about the Lord of the universe? We know he is one,
but he is too big to be comprehended by anyone. And he is different for
different people. For someone who wants education, she is saraswathy,
the lord of education. For some one who wants money she is lord of
wealth, lakshmi. For someone who wants power, she is Lord of energy,
Sakthi. That is in one level where a man looks for material things.

 In another level, the learned and thinkers know the Lord is one and
they constantly teach the less learned about the respect for everyone's
beliefs. But more higher a person moves up in sprituality, he
understands the most complex nature of the realization. And the
realization can neither be discoursed nor it can be explained. It is
like explaining to a person about sweetness. I know sugar is sweet. If I
am forced to explain what is sweetness of sugar to another person who
never experienced sugar or any sweet, how will I explain? Can one
explain at all? That is the same thing about realization of Lord. It had
to be experienced. It cannot be explained. But you can explain where to
find the sugar and how to eat the sugar. That exactly what all the
Sanatana Dharma books explain. For example, Gita explains the yogas, the
ways, to realize the Lord.

 But again, if someone higher in sprituality explains his understanding
to someone who is not able enough too understand it, the student most
likely will corrupt the teachings and reduce the teachings to a
nonsense. That is the problem the Saints of Sanatana Dharma keep
explaining to the people. Just like material education, spritual
education should also be gradual. You cannot explain Einstein's theory
to a Kindergarten student. So, you cannot teach the higher truth to the
novice. Some children are genius who could understand the Einstein's
theory even in primary school. Sameway, some gifted religiuos people can
realize the Lord even at very young age or even with out the teacher.

 That is exactly what Hinduism does. By removing the religion from the
material things and political things, it raises the realization of the
Lord into another educational area.

 But other people who did not know the above things associated castes
with Hinduism and explained the world over that Hinduism is bad. Slavery
was in all Islamic and Christian lands but no one associates slavery
with Islam or christianity. Casteism is a political constitution of
ancient India, and Sanatana Dharma was a religion of the India and the
world. There is no need to confuse both.

 Hindu Saints did talk about the functions of the society. Teachers
(brahmins), Warriors(kshatriyas), Traders(Vaishyas) and Sudras(workers)
exist in every society irrespective of whether that is America or
Pakistan. In ancient India, the Hindu saints codified the rules for
these people. How a warrior should behave? Why teachers(Brahmins) should
not have any properties? What are the obligations of the traders? These
are the issues some of them were converted to enforceable rules and some
of them were guiding principles. The modern India does not care about
castes. It slowly transforming from a hereditory caste structure to a
individualist society.

Hence there is no need to ask, "If I become Hindu, will I become a
sudra?" Millions of Hindus do not accept caste and millions of Hindus do
not have caste. Now people intermarry in India among the castes and
religions. Hence a simple declaration that "I am a Sanathani" itself is
enough to liberate you.

 Being a Hindu entitles many things on you. You should educate your
children in modern sciences and encourage them into analytical thinking.
You should respect everyone else's opinion and listen to them really.
You should help others to improve their life. You should do what is your
Dharma. That is if you are a student in college, you should really be a
student and nothing else ( I mean no politics and side-business etc) If
you are taking up work as an employee, you should do the work completely
with the satisfaction of yourself and everyone.

 All the best and Best Wishes.

 
 --->>>iTS ALL VERY NICE TO CALL CHANGING NAMES TO 'SANATAN DHARM'OR ARYA SAMAJ OR BRAHMO SAMAJ,OR PHILOSOPHY OF VIVEKA NANDA OR HIS GURU RAMKRISHNA PRAMA HANSA.THIS JUST SHOWS HOW RESTLESS HINDU IS TRYING TO WRIGGLE OUT OF ITS CONFINING SUFFOCATING PHILOSOPHY OF NON SENSE.NO SANE PERSON CAN TAKE RIDICULOUS IDOL WORSHIP SATI DOWRY ,INFANTICIDE OF FEMALE GENDER & ABORTION OF FEMALE FETUSES,THE RAMPAnt oblivious attitude towards prostitution devdasni making themselves available to pujari of Puri ,Benares ,Andhra pradesh is that the reaSon theRe 40 million devdasini leading to acceptability of sex worker prostitution in india & 4 milliuon hi+ve positive cases tested & equally high number undignosed pimps prostitutes & clients of them ,who inturn go home to there dowry wife to infect them.NOT TO SPEAK OF HOW YOU JUSTIFY CASTEISM ,GLIBLY BY GIVING EXCUSE FOR SLAVERY.IN ISLAM MUCH BEFORE AMERICA IMPORTED FIRST SLAVE ,WHO BTW WERE ALL MUSLIMS OF AFRICA,ISLAM HAD SPOKEN AGAINST SLAVERY & IN FAVOUR OF EQUALITY 1500 YRS AGO BEFORE AMERICA WAS DISCOVERED 1000 YRS LATER.

"It is
like explaining to a person about sweetness. I know sugar is sweet." MR, SWEET TALK YOU QUOTE LIKE HE BUGGY MAN COME TO ABDUCT THE INNOCENT WITH YOUR CHANAKYA LIKE DIVERSIONARY TACTICS.
YES MR. HINDU YOU HAVE NOT YET TASTED SWEET.YOU HAVE IS SUBSTITUTE SUGAR TASTE IN YOUR MOUTH THINKING IT IS THE REAL THING.ASK THE TRUE MUSLIM HOW ALLAHS DIVINE SWEET TASTES IN RAMADAN ,IFTAR,AFTER 'TRABI' IN RAMADAN NIGHT & WHOLE NIGHT PRAYER ON 'LAILATULL QADAERR'YOU HINDUS ARE DIABETIC & FOREVER WILL THINK SACHARINE & ASPERTINE AS YOUR SUGAR UNTILL YOU READ ,COMPARE & TASTE THE REAL SUGAR .WE CAN TASTE IT AS WE ARE NOT DIABETIC TO BE DEPRIVED OF TAKING THE REAL TASTE OF SWEETNESS LIKE YOU ARE UNABLE TO DO FOR SOME CURSE OF GOD .

"ow people intermarry in India among the castes and
religions. Hence a simple declaration that "I am a Sanathani" itself is
enough to liberate you.
ARE YOU TRYING TO EDUCATE ABOUT WHAT HINDUISM REALLY IS OR TRYING TO ENCOURAGE MUSLIM GIRLS TO MARRY YOUR BOYS.THERE IS NO CONVERSION IN HINDU RELIGION.HINDU IS BORN BRAHMIN ,SUDRA VAISHYA OR KSHTRYA & THIS FELLA IS SUGAR COATING IT BY CALLING IT SANATHINI & YOU ARE IN.

OF COURSE IN METROPOLITAN CITIES LIKE MUMAI ,NEW YORK U WORK & NO ONE CARES ABOUT YOU BEING HINDU OR SANATHINI BUT FOR WHOLE FUTURE SANATHINI CAN BE WHAT OUTCASTES ARE IN HINDUISM,FOR ONLY HINDU ARE BORN WITH THERE CASTE IDENTITY.

 "Being entitles many things on you. You should educate your
children in modern sciences and encourage them into analytical thinking.
You should respect everyone else's opinion and listen to them really.
You should help others to improve their life. You should do what is your
Dharma. That is if you are a student in college, you should really be a
student and nothing else.
STRUDENT SHOULD LEAR MORE THAN 3 RS SPECIALLY IN COLLEGE.
IN SHORT LIKE THIS SAYING LEARNING & KEEPING AN OPEN MIND SHOULD BE FIRST FOLLOWED BY THIS PUBLIC RELATION OFFICER WRITER OF THIS TRYING TO SEET TALK YOUNG ADULT COLLEGE AGE YOUTHS.WHO WOULDNT OPEN HIS MIND TO ISLAM FOR HE IS AFRAID OF LEARNING THE SWEETNESS OF TRUE SUGAR THAT HE HAS NEVER TASTED & IS AFRAID OF BEING SWAYED FROM HIS OWN FORCEFULL ATTEMPT TO REMAIN HINDU AGAINST ALL LOGIC,REASON,EDUCATION &REASONABLENESS.

[This message has been edited by Azad Munna (edited March 21, 2001).]

*WHY MUSLIM SHOULD CONVERT TO HINDUISM? *

To get to the other side?

The first post is interesting…i’ll be back to read it and then reflect on it..
later

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif


Herem aik, Khuda aik, Nabi aik, Quran bhi aik
Kya Kuch berhi baat thi, hotey agher muselmaan bhi aik :rotato:

Some nonmuslim here in there ignorence accuse muslim of incapable of understanding ABSTRACT concepts that is why"they (muslim) have WRITTEN rules & that is why they follow it strictly to the letter."

Now when did writng help abstract understanding! Anything written words are used b/c one might FORGET, it ,hardly uncommon even in ppl. with elephant memory.

Things are written for authenticity ,otherwise like Bible &Ramayan there would be different versions.Koran although comnpiled by followers remain same in content, no matter who compiled it or arranged it so to say.

Regarding following it to the core is concerned that is the reason why it was written & made sure authentic so that we may have confidence in laying our allegience to & feel CORRECT ,b/c it is free fom pollution.


:

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif

When was i for real?
I am myself a dream

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif

I always see you
watching me tenderly :slight_smile:

[This message has been edited by sanam (edited March 21, 2001).]

[quote]
Originally posted by sanam:
*Now when did writng help abstract understanding! Anything written words are used b/c one might FORGET, it ,hardly uncommon even in ppl. with elephant memory.
*

[/quote]

Invalid argument. Quran took over 100 years to be written down. Clearly, memory can be used to remember everything. Not only that, there was more than one version. So clearly faulty versions of a scripture can be struck down.

That is one of the most stupidist writing
I've ever read...I will write more on this
little bit later...

Dont post their articles. Dont advertise their sayings. It is best not to spread such pathetic literature.

[quote]
Originally posted by Topee Wala:
Dont post their articles. Dont advertise their sayings. It is best not to spread such pathetic literature.
[/quote]

Topeewala

I personally think ,I can refute all Dis-informations they can throw at me.Yes for some ppl.not reading would be preferable conservation of time ,i agree.

I for myself ,like to LOOK RIGHT INO THE EYE OF THE DEVIL & NOT BLINK!

Sometimes in order to avoid from being taken aback by surprise attack it is good to keep update on the "KHURAFAT OF THE DEVIL" To be aware is to be prepared.

I dont see any ZZ,Andhra,Infoman,Queer,Kumarakn,Ranjha jatt,Rani ,giving any challenge ,so i picked on to practice by myself from the Rabid hindutva site .Let them come to me with there lies,& i have guts to unveil there fasade grown out of proportion by the avoiding muslim mass.


barque(bijli) yoon akadti hai apne karname pe ke
jaise phir naya hum aashiyaan bana nahi sakte

[quote]
Originally posted by astrosfan:
** Invalid argument. Quran took over 100 years to be written down. Clearly, memory can be used to remember everything. Not only that, there was more than one version. So clearly faulty versions of a scripture can be struck down.**
[/quote]

Astrosofan,

You either edit u r post for typo & syntax or taalk in ENGLISH.

"Invalid argument. Quran took over 100 years to be written down. Clearly,
memory can be used to remember everything. Not only that, there was
more than one version. So clearly faulty versions of a scripture can be
struck down."

Do you care to elucidate ,edit or correct for whatever you are saying !anybody ,can they understand what he is talking about,


barque(bijli) yoon akadti hai apne karname pe ke
jaise phir naya hum aashiyaan bana nahi sakte

Sanam's argument was that even elephant memoried people will forget things, so it has to be written down. However, she forgot to mention that the Quran had to be remembered by several people, over a long period of time. This means that it is possible to remember large tracts of words exactly. Therefore, her refutation of the arguement that Muslims cannot comprehend abstract principles is faulty. Sanam needs to try harder.

As for her argument about the need for writing things down to maintain authenticity, she forgets to mention that when the Quran was written down, more than one version became available. These alternate versions were struck down, and only the current one was left standing.

It is on the basis of faith that the one Quran remaining is actually the one that Muhammed spoke to his followers.

ALL I KNOW THAT ABSTRACT CONCEPTS ARE NO MONOPPLY OF ANY RACE.

I think Rani accused muslim of not having abstract concept & on top of that her reason was “because muslim need written words & follow it literally” thats funny isn’t it .

Not only first statement is WRONG but reason seems to be more silly than this LOL
http://www.worldnews.com/?action=display&article=6331226&template=worldnews/search.txt&index=recent
http://www.worldnews.com/?action=display&article=6331226&template=worldnews/search.txt&index=recent
India City Tense After Quran Burned
The Associated Press, Thu 22 Mar 2001Email this story to a friend Print
this story AMRITSAR, India (AP) — Police commandos were posted in a
northern Indian city to prevent religious clashes Thursday after Hindu
nationalists desecrated a mosque and burned copies of the Quran.
Members of the All India Hindu Protection Committee entered the
200-year-old Kheruddin Mosque in Amritsar late Wednesday, burned copies
of the Islamic holy book and threw pork, a meat forbidden to Muslims,
into the main compound, mosque manager Mohammad Anwar said.

Students were attending Quran classes at the time, Anwar said.

Police cordoned off roads leading to the mosque and posted commandos
outside it. An investigation was under way, said A.P. Pandey, the
inspector-general of police.

The Hindu group said the attack was in retaliation for the slaughter of
cows in Afghanistan by the Taliban regime, which said it needed to atone
for the delay in destroying ancient statues of Buddha that were deemed
idolatrous. Hindus consider cows sacred.

The desecration in Amritsar, where Muslims number about 30,000 in a
population of 150,000 people, came days after clashes between Muslim
protesters and police left 14 dead in the northern city of Kanpur.

The clashes began with Muslim outrage over Hindu fundamentalists’
burning of a Quran in New Delhi to protest the Taliban’s destruction of
Afghanistan’s pre-Islamic statues.


barque(bijli) yoon akadti hai apne karname pe ke
jaise phir naya hum aashiyaan bana nahi sakte

[quote]
Originally posted by astrosfan:
***WHY MUSLIM SHOULD CONVERT TO HINDUISM? *

To get to the other side?**
[/quote]

astro.,
really !
First ,why convert when you can name yourself 'FYI hindu 'with no obligation to ANY belief,hence you are welcome to use non patent free for all name to have double indentity .So NO Need to convert any whatso ever.Dilip Kumar .Meena Kumari ,worked as hindu still remaing devout muslims

As for need to go to the other side,why when you have better life here.Just like ppl. experimenting with drugs for psychedellic experience ,it would be injurious to you over all health, spiritual,physical ,& mental

Nice try ,Astrosofan

Dude, it's a joke.

"Why did a chicken cross the road?"
"To get to the other side."

Joke. Let it go.

I don't want to go into the rest....I love BEEF and I won't give this up for the world.

hmmmmm bEeEeEEEEEEEEFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 100 g of is half of your daily Iron you know.

[quote]
Originally posted by kingshah:
I don't want to go into the rest....I love BEEF and I won't give this up for the world.
[/quote]

Good thing you aren't in the UK.

[quote]
Originally posted by astrosfan:
** Invalid argument. Quran took over 100 years to be written down. Clearly, memory can be used to remember everything. Not only that, there was more than one version. So clearly faulty versions of a scripture can be struck down.**
[/quote]

I don't know where you get your information from (post a link please)... I suggest you go to some websites and do your research before you say all this BS.

The Qur'an was written down on leafs during the time of the prophet... the actual compilation took place a while later.
Hazrat Ali (A.S) compiled it sorted by date.. while the other version was compiled as is. That's is the only difference.. (Different versions as you call it) . The content was the same.. just the order of the CHAPTERS was different.

Get some EDUCATION on ISLAM and then come here and post BS


Shah-e-Mardan Sher-e-Yazdan,
Quwwat-e-Parwardigar,
Lafatah illa ALI,
La Saif ila Zulfiqar
========================

[quote]
Originally posted by Lashkar-e-Abbas:
Get some EDUCATION on ISLAM and then come here and post BS
[/quote]

I'm sorry - I must have bitten a little too far into your sacrosanct revisionism of Islam. Or were you really not aware that Uthman had alternate versions destroyed. Probably not, they don't exactly teach you the questionable parts of Islamic history in school, do they?

Let me guess, all your hadiths are authentic, too, huh?

Oh well... That is what I have learnt, not to spread useless opinions like the one shown in this article. There is nothing gained. If there is an article bad mouthing muslims or Islam then I shall increase awareness but artilce like these...amm...well i dont know. They dont just seem right to spread. We are doing what they want us to do. Bring articles like these to the most number of Muslims. Why should we be doing their work.

[quote]
Originally posted by astrosfan:
** I'm sorry - I must have bitten a little too far into your sacrosanct revisionism of Islam. Or were you really not aware that Uthman had alternate versions destroyed. Probably not, they don't exactly teach you the questionable parts of Islamic history in school, do they?

Let me guess, all your hadiths are authentic, too, huh?**
[/quote]

So now u want to educate us on all the 'BAD' parts of our religion?!

Please go ahead. Lets see what you can spew up now.