Why is U.S. foreign policy hostage to Israel?

hit right, but does it matter or the dormancy is so thick, that even death will not wake up anyone conscientious?

in short, concise, succinct and correct.
comments on the article?

Article published Monday, January 12, 2009
Why is U.S. foreign policy hostage to Israel?

THE ongoing carnage in Gaza raises some disturbing and sobering questions for the people of conscious everywhere, and that includes Toledo. At the time of this writing, close to 700 Palestinian men, women, and children had died and three times as many had been injured.

The pivotal question is why Hamas, the ruling Palestinian faction in Gaza, resumed firing rockets into Israel after six months of relative calm following a cease-fire put in place in June.

A cease-fire requires a lack of hostilities between the parties. On Nov. 4, Israel, in clear violation of the cease-fire, went into Gaza and killed six Palestinians who Israel declared were terrorists. That incident and an ongoing siege and blockade of Gaza were enough reasons for Hamas to resume hostilities against Israel. It was retaliation plain and simple. Israel has been preparing for this onslaught for the last six months and chose this time because George W. Bush is still president.

Ever since the withdrawal of Israeli forces and the dismantling of illegal Jewish settlements from Gaza in September, 2005, the area has been under siege. A total blockade has turned this narrow coastal strip of land into a virtual prison where 1.5 million inhabitants depended on the trickle of humanitarian aid allowed by Israel. Mary Robinson, the former United Nations high commissioner for human rights, called the ongoing situation in Gaza the destruction of a civilization. Her comments were made during the cease-fire.

In January, 2006, Hamas won elections in Gaza in a fair and impartial vote. The United States had, at the behest of Israel, declared Hamas a terrorist organization. As such, they were denied their legitimate right to govern and to have the cooperation of the international community. If fighting for one’s dignity, one’s land, and one’s freedom is terrorism, then most countries that became independent in the post-colonial era got there through terrorism. Even Israel’s establishment as a sovereign state was based on many acts of terrorism against the British and the native Palestinian population. There is an extremely thin line between a terrorist and a freedom fighter. All one has to do is to look at the life of Menachem Begin, a terrorist turned prime minister of Israel.

It is no surprise that most Arab governments have sold their soul at the altar of the United States and Israel. Every time there is an incident like Gaza, and there have been innumerable in the past decades, they get together to make phony noises of solidarity that result in nothing. At a recent press conference at the United Nations, the Arab ambassadors went through the usual hand-wringing and expressions of frustration at their inability to effect change. Missing in the whole macabre spectacle was a conscientious Arab journalist with a sturdy pair of shoes.
Why is American foreign policy hostage to Israeli whims? It is for historians and writers such as John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, former Congressman Paul Findlay, former President Jimmy Carter, writer Norman Finkelstein, etc., to analyze the phenomenon, which they have done at their peril. The question, however, begs for an answer. Why does an Israeli cause become an American cause? And why does a Congress elected by the people of this country become beholden to the interests of a foreign country?

Israel is the most powerful country in the Middle East. Its survival is not threatened by rag-tag bands of so-called terrorists. At the heart of Israeli actions is the determination to hang on to the occupied lands. All peace initiatives on a two-state solutions are bound to fail because of the dominant role the Israeli right and the militant settlers play in Israeli politics. They are loath to give any land back to the Palestinians.

In the end Israel would rather see a fragmentation of Palestinian society reminiscent of apartheid South Africa, and allow them a measure of watered down and wholly dependent self-rule.

Surprisingly, a great majority of the world has endorsed a two-state solution along 1967 borders in the form of U.N. General Assembly resolutions. All Arab countries have endorsed it. Even Hamas has expressed its willingness to accept that broad solution. The only countries voting against the resolution are the United States, Israel, Australia, and an atoll of small island nations in the Pacific.

And finally, where are the moderate voices of American Jewry? While there is a vigorous debate inside Israel about occupied lands, there is hardly any dissent in this country. Given the history of last 60 years, there must have been a few occasions when the people of conscience could have spoken out against the policies of Israel. Instead, they always found reasons to blame the victims or remain silent.

One of my Jewish readers put it succinctly when he said, in private of course, that if he ever raises a voice against Israel policies he will be crucified.

Permanent Link Dr. S. Amjad Hussain is a Toledo surgeon whose column appears every other week in The Blade.
» E-mail him at [email protected]
» Read more Dr. Hussain columns at toledoblade.com –

Re: Why is U.S. foreign policy hostage to Israel?

Q: Why is US foreign policy hostage to Israel?
A: Financial control/dependency of Israel's lobby.

If US turns its back on Israel the financial outflow from US will cripple it from "Super Power" to "Micro Power", suddenly China/India/Russia/"Euro" will replace US. I don't see any other reason behind US's blind support for Israel.

For emotional analysis, Dr. Hussain is right on the money.

For “real” global analysis, Dr. Hussain is writing just like another Arab street person, who has his eyes wide shut when it comes to the modern geo-strategic policies.

Just look at the expenses.

US is $3,000 billion / year nation.
Israel is $80 billion / year country.

What is the ratio? US/Israel as roughly 37/1. You think a 10 pound child can hold a 370 pounder wrestler as hostage?

Obviously no.

Israel is just one (important though) piece on the world’s game of Chess being played by the super power the USA.

BTW Indians say the same thing about Pakistan. That why USA goes out of his way to side with Pakistan.

These days they are trying their level best to bring Pakistan further down in the list of most favored countries of the USA. And still Joe Biden and others make a beeline to Islamabad and get awarded by the Pakistani medals.

Hope you get the point.

Re: Why is U.S. foreign policy hostage to Israel?

US foreign Policy is not hostage its called interest, America is controlling whole Middle East with One Police Man. Not a bad deal !

Same will be happen in South Asia with India as a Police Man !

Agreed. However now it is not one man show in the Middle East. US is "managing" the region with Israel, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and soon Iraq.

Case in point. Egypt and Israel both get US aid and there is not a HUGE difference between the amounts. A billion here or billion there of a difference, but the two countries are "major" policemen with supporting role from other Arab countries.

Correction!
India is policeman for mainly areas east of Pakistan.

Pakistan is a policeman for mainly West of Pakistan.

Indians got a bit more role recently in Afghanistan only because they were willing to send troops in afghanistan.

So US entrains Indians please for their role in the West of Pakistan only when Pakistan refuses to help out.

Recently Pakistan has shown much more willingness to go after Taliban. If Pakistani army keeps the Taliban on the run, they will get much bigger role in Afghanistan.

The matter is purely for logistics and expertise. Pakistan does have better logistics (for obvious reasons), than India when it comes to areas West of Pakistan.

And Pakistanis are much better experts of Afghan problem than India can ever be.

Hope you get the point. US "contracts" out the services to "willing" and "expert" parties. That is applicable to Egypt, to Israel, to Pakistan, and to other countries.

As in any business, it matters as to how long you have been the around, and how consistent have you been, and how much you can help with manpower vs. money or both.
**
US Ally chart and why a specific ally is important and degree of importance**

Israel - longest (since 1940s) and most consistent ally
-----(can provide decent manpower but not too much)

Pakistan - longest time (40s) ally but inconsistent
-----(can provide a lot of manpower)

Egypt - consistent only after Sadat (70s).
-----(can provide lot of manpower)

Jordan - consistent and longest (since 40s) ally
-----(cannot provide manpower)

Saudi Arabia - consistent and longest (since 40s) ally
-----(but cannot provide manpower)

India - consistent only after the death of Soviet Union (late 80s or early 90s) ally
----- (can provide lots of manpower)

So you take this scale and figure out the value of each "ally" in the eyes of the USA.

You have no point. Just baseless rhetoric; try again.

Present you point, Genius.
All of your posts are just filled with this kind a reply's. Why you even bother to reply ?

Re: Why is U.S. foreign policy hostage to Israel?

The U.S foreign policy is written by Israel. The Zionists control the U.S.

Take English lessons first!

[QUOTE]

All of your posts are just filled with this kind a reply's.

[/QUOTE]

My reply is fitting for those who are racist against Arabs.

[QUOTE]

Why you even bother to reply ?

[/QUOTE]

To get a reaction from people like you. Mission accomplished!

Jews might be then most genesis people of the world then... they are controlling everything.. even the kids are born, jews have hand behind it !

Re: Why is U.S. foreign policy hostage to Israel?

this subject is brought up time and time again because people are un-willing to face up to the united states over it. the US is able to help israel with complete impunity under these circumstances. their diplomats are still treated above first class by nations who should really be kicking them out. there is absolutely no evidence to suggest the US has ever faced any loss of favour for their support of such evil.

tension between pro israelli and patriot americans around the table in washington would be a much better situation to be in. this can only happen once the united states is somehow effected by its actions, when there is consequence

firenze, on another thread did you say you were educated? are you just writing things that you think you should be writing to attain 'moderate' status. these political subforums are not for kids.

dude, dont get frustrated just coz you were not sent to school for whatever reason. And start behaving.

i didn't read the complete article but here is my take on this:

i was talking to one of the guys at work who is originally from europe...he has been around in the 70's....i would not call him a rascist but he certainly is very opinionated. he was talking about how the jews are in a lot of imp gov. positions (i say good for them and for all their hardwork). this would influence US policy towards israel...and this is coming from a non-muslim.

he mentioned that in the 70's iran was to US what israel is now to US...i have never thought of it this way but it kind of makes sense. US needs a so called strategic partner in middle east to keep a check on other states and israel fits that profile for now.

Re: Why is U.S. foreign policy hostage to Israel?

The powerful Jewish lobby.

Re: Why is U.S. foreign policy hostage to Israel?

i would say other minorities need (south asians?) to start looking into careers beyond engineering or medicine and consider careers which help shape the policy of the country and actually have a say in things which matter. it probably is already happening...

It is true to some extent. However the lobby can't do a squat if the "lobbyed country" starts lobbing bombs on American interests.

it is a two way street. Some lobbying helps, but the country you want to lobby for, must offer all the khidmat to the USA.

You sound like a Pakistani street person, like burka over here.

Re: Why is U.S. foreign policy hostage to Israel?

It is not just about lobbying. Zionists control the money, control the media. They give politicians the money to run for elections.They control many important positions of power within the U.S. The President is just a figurehead, whatever President is elected or whichever party wins the foreign policy will continue to be dictated by the Zionists, and remains the same.

Brian Cloughley: Who Runs America?

By BRIAN CLOUGHLEY

Winston Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt were pretty close, politically and personally. They led the fight against fascism in the early 1940s, and although they had their disagreements they got on very well. They were both blunt in expressing their views, but there was no doubt who was the more powerful : Roosevelt called the shots, although Churchill had a lot of influence on him. But it would have been unthinkable for Churchill to have behaved in the way that the present (though not for long) prime minister of Israel did with the present (though not for long) president of the United States.
Prime minister Olmert of Israel, who has been forced to stand down because of allegations of corruption, telephoned President Bush to make the latter alter his orders to his Secretary of State to support a mild resolution in the UN Security Council that called for a ceasefire in Gaza. The barely believable transcript of Olmert’s boasting of his success is on public record. He said:
“I [Olmert] spoke with him [Bush]; I told him: You can’t vote for this proposal. He said: listen, I don’t know, I didn’t see, don’t know what it says. I told him: I know, and you can’t vote for it! He then instructed the secretary of state, and she did not vote for it.”
There is no other head of government in the entire world who could say such words to the president of the United States. And will Olmert’s successor be able to speak with Bush’s successor in the same way and with a similar result?
We know the name of the next US president, but we don’t know who the next Israeli prime minister will be. It looks as if it might be a choice between two steel-minded sadists, Tzipi Livni or Binyamin Netanyahu, both dedicated haters of Palestine, Palestinians and Arabs in general. So what might they be able to say to President Obama? Will they be able to pick up the phone and call him to suggest forcefully that he alter the voting intention of the United States of America in the UN Security Council? And what would he do, if they did?
Given the commitment to Israel of Mr Obama and his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, as was obvious in their groveling speeches last year to the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, there is no guarantee that they will, either of them, ever utter a word in criticism of Israel.
There is one thing certain: the US Congress is going to continue its unconditional support for Israel, no matter what war crimes are committed by its disgusting thugs-in-uniform. The Reps need the money, after all, which they get through political action committees which are generously funded by American Jews. And they are scared to political death by the threat that pro-Israel agencies will destroy them politically if they dare say a word against Israel.
There are very few Representatives of the people of America who would dare challenge Israel, or who might possibly criticize Israel, or who have the courage to condemn atrocities committed by Israel.


The worst of all the barbarians who are killing children and their mothers and fathers in Gaza are the Israeli pilots who mercilessly bomb houses occupied by terrified families. And they are staunchly supported by the House of Representatives of the United States of America.
These pilots, these vile little war-gamers of the skies, these latter-day examples of what Tom Wolfe called “The Right Stuff”, can zoom over towns full of traumatized children and happily heave and hurl their bombs and rockets to kill yet more Palestinian kids without the remotest chance of being shot down. How heroic; how truly gladiatorial. How contemptible. They are blood brothers with the pilots of the Nazis’ Stuka ground attack aircraft of yesteryear, with their terrifying sirens, who bombed columns of fleeing refugees all round Europe.
But the US House of Representatives rushed to praise Israel, and endorse its invasion and its merciless air strikes, and committed America to a motion “Recognizing Israel’s right to defend itself against attacks from Gaza, reaffirming the United States’ strong support for Israel, and supporting the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.”


Not many Americans know anything about the hideous barbarity in Gaza, because US cable networks and newspapers rarely carry pictures of disfigured blood-splashed children who have been killed, maimed or orphaned by the Israelis. But here in Europe we have access to some TV channels and newspapers that are very different from the pliant pro-Zion patsies of the major news outlets across the Atlantic.
And if US television channels carried pictures like the ones we see, there would be such outbursts of horror and indignation that even the US Congress might be forced to condemn the Israeli fascists for their barbarity. But the all-powerful Israel lobby makes sure that little of the sort will appear.
Who runs America?
The only honorable members of the House, voting against unconditional support for Israeli killing of Palestinian children, were Democrats Dennis Kucinich (Ohio), Maxine Waters (California), Gwen Moore (Wisconsin), and Nick Rahall (West Virginia), along with Texas Republican Ron Paul. And Mr Kucinich put the whole case for their vote when he said
“In Gaza, the United Nations gave the Israeli army the coordinates of a UN school, and the school was then hit by Israeli tank fire, killing about 40. The UN put flags on emergency vehicles, coordinating the movements of those vehicles with the Israeli military, and the vehicles came under attack, killing emergency workers. The Israeli army evacuated 100 Palestinians to shelter, and then bombed the shelter, killing 30 people.”
Blunt stuff – but it cut no ice with the 390 members of the House who voted for Israel to continue its killing.
The Israelis have killed over a thousand Palestinians, and the UN reports that at least 500 of these deaths were civilians, and that half of these were women and children. One million of Gaza’s 1.5 million people have no electricity, and about 750,000 are without water. They are existing in conditions of appalling squalor and fear, with US-supplied helicopter gunships and F-16s striking at will, and tanks and artillery destroying their houses and killing their children.
Yet the House votes for Israel. And the President of the United States of America jumps to obey the Israeli prime minister. But will there be any change under Obama and Clinton?
A year ago Hillary Clinton told the American Israeli Committee that “we stand with Israel because of our shared values and our shared belief in the dignity of men and women and the right to live without fear or oppression.”
Last June Barack Obama told the American Israeli Committee “Now is the time to be vigilant in facing down every foe, just as we move forward in seeking a future of peace for the children of Israel, and for all children. Now is the time to stand by Israel . . .”
Will they continue to support Israel, the country that has laid waste a land and murdered over 200 women and children?
If they do, the question must be asked: Who runs America?

Brian Cloughley’s book about the Pakistan army, War, Coups and Terror, has just been published by Pen & Sword Books (UK) and will be published in the US in May by Skyhorse (New York).

its not just about financials but remember US administration is filled with evangelical Christians and i think for them for the christ re coming in the world it is really important israel holds jeruselam.

furthermore i think if we really wish to make a difference then its better to work toward reducing their influence rather shouting and pointing.