THIS DISCUSSION IS ABOUT PAKISTANIS IN RELATION TO THE NATIVE POPULATION, NOT MIXED RACE WHICH CAN MEAN ANYTHING mixed with white and the reason ‘Asians’ as a whole have come up higher in ur reference is because THEY HAVE INCLUDED INDIANS(amongst the highest achievers in contrast to us) which has dragged up the others. If it was just Pakistanis u would have seen they come at/nr the bottom (depending on the sex). Ur just making urself look stupid now.
And I didn’t mention just exam results I also mentioned poverty and unemployment levels - something that was v.relevent to the point that whites tendto **think of PAKISTANIS as poor, uneducated etc. **
Are u now going to pretend that Pakistanis are amongst the most well-off and hold down the best jobs by using data that includes Indians to mask our own much much lower levels??**
**
Concerning that OTHER thread *how the hell would I even know u were talking about that when u didn’t even mention it?? Desi women are two to three times more likely to suffer clinical depression than white women hence I dunno how u can say they are ‘mentally stronger’:
'Previous studies have shown that South Asian women living in the UK – particularly those of Pakistani origin – have a higher rate of depression, suicide and self-harm than White women.’
‘Most women experiencing domestic violence suffer from depression and trauma. However, research has shown than Asian women are 2-3 times more likely to commit suicide than women in the general population.’
If u paid more attention u would have seen that I specifically mentioned women.
(Perhaps u should stick to ‘World Affairs’ where u can continue slagging off India to try and divert attention away from Pakistan/Pakistani problems and calling anything that might show it in a negative light ‘Western propaganda’ or a ‘Zionist plot.’)
'Mockery?' - Funny how no-one else thinks that except you and funny coming from someone who usually calls anything that might show Pakistan/Pakistanis/Pak culture as less than perfect 'propaganda' or a 'Zionist plot.'
The irony is u are obsessed with slagging off Indians (and others) yet in this thread u have used their results to try and make us Pakistanis look better LOL
I mentioned poverty as one of the reasons why 'Paki' was used as a derogatory term. If u can't understand that I really feel sorry for u.
'Mockery?' - Funny how no-one else thinks that except you and funny coming from someone who usually calls anything that might show Pakistan/Pakistanis/Pak culture as less than perfect 'propaganda' or a 'Zionist plot.'
The irony is u are obsessed with slagging off Indians (and others) yet in this thread u have used their results to try and make us Pakistanis look better LOL
I mentioned poverty as one of the reasons why 'Paki' was used as a derogatory term. If u can't understand that I really feel sorry for u.
Never used the word 'zionists' in any of my posts. Try not to go out of control dear.
Read my post before you to get enlightened, I did not deny it was a derogatory term. And you accuse me of not being able to read?
I did not use their results, I used desis versus non desis. You are the one who tried to say 'non desis' have stronger minds. I simply proved you wrong.
