[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by rvikz: *
can pakistan economy survive without cash infusion or debt
cancellation from united states ? who are the largest aid recieving
nations ? can anybody list the nations?
[/QUOTE]
nice try buddy......
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by rvikz: *
can pakistan economy survive without cash infusion or debt
cancellation from united states ? who are the largest aid recieving
nations ? can anybody list the nations?
[/QUOTE]
nice try buddy......
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by phoenixdesi: *
nice try buddy......
[/QUOTE]
this is without any natural disater i am talking about.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by rvikz: *
can pakistan economy survive without cash infusion or debt
cancellation from united states ? who are the largest aid recieving
nations ? can anybody list the nations?
[/QUOTE]
Typical Bharati low esteem. Even when Bharat is poised to become a leading country, people like rviks are ready to pin prick Pakistan. It is people like you who are keeping the region in the darkness.
It is time for Bhartis to move on from the hate+envy filled mindset and work for everyone's progress and prosperity.
Time and again Pakistanis have shown that they are happy with Bharati progress. Get off of your internet addiction, spend some $$ (if you have any) and visit Pakistan. Or at least read the Bharati Bhonpoo Rediff.com and see how well Bharati visitors were treated in Pakistan.
Bharati leadership is maturing and rejection of foreign aid is one of the indications. Alas Bharati people especially these immature computer geeks living in the West are still stuck up the smelly, hate filled a$$es.
Happy New Year and let’s hope 2005 will reduce hate and bring peace and prosperity to a destitute region called Indian subcontinent.
[QUOTE]
Bharati leadership is maturing and rejection of foreign aid is one of the indications. Alas Bharati people especially these immature computer geeks living in the West are still stuck up the smelly, hate filled a$$es.
Happy New Year and let’s hope 2005 will reduce hate and bring peace and prosperity to a destitute region called Indian subcontinent
[/QUOTE]
Define Irony.
Back to the thread.
Re: Re: Why is India rejecting any foreign Aid help?
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by alooparatha: *
This is what it is all about.
How can you accept aid, whilst at the same time aspire to a UNSC seat.
How can you accept aid, whilst at the same time be the world's labour pool for software programmers and call-centres and other outsourcing activities.
[/QUOTE]
alooparatha just might be right concerning ^.
Many Americans have lost jobs to India...not to grudge Indians jobs...but accepting millions of U.S. aid dollars...tax monies...some people might feel offended...
offended that tax monies paid by citizens into U.S. government being used to benefit the very people who now hold their old job.
And I apologize for saying this.
What kind of human-being am I to mention such? Definately not the kind God would be proud of.
India’s Coming of Age, Post-Tsunami
By Ghulam Muhammed
Al-Jazeerah, January 1, 2005
Within hours of Aceh tsunami hitting the coasts of nations around Indian Ocean, the first to face the world with a reassuring message of relief and rehabilitation, was not Bush, Blair, Putin, Koizumi or Hu Jintao. It was India’s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. While Bush came out with a $15 million, a measly amount in comparison to $3.6 billion for Florida tornado disaster that took 116 lives, and offered aid to India towards relief, India found it convenient as well as appropriate to decline the offer and assured of its full capacity to cope with the disaster, at least as far as Indian shores were concerned. Gone were the days, when the first port of call for all heads of Indian government was either the US or the UN, whenever any big calamities hit its people. That newly acquired confidence will not go unnoticed by the rest of the world. India has come of age, and as befits a nation aspiring to be counted on the highest seats of world governance, India had taken the fi! rst step to project itself as a self-sufficient and responsible nation that could take care of its people without having to go around the world with a begging ball.
The next, step for India, will be, no doubt, to look beyond its borders and treat all such natural tragedies as common concern of all the people of the world. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has come out of that centuries old Brahmanical taboo that ghettoized India to its own shores. In today’s globalized world, India under the new leadership, has confidently and promptly acquired the new accoutrements that perfectly suit the native ethos of a people humane enough to populate this vast continent of a nation, without any reference to ideologies of religion, caste, region, race and languages. Let all such ideologies compete to fit the criteria of being the best suited to India’s coming of age and its humanitarian contribution to the peace and well-being of the world.
India is trying to be something it is not.... All the effected countries, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Sri Lanka are richer have more resources and better living conditions then India but they welcomed help... BTW international aids agencies are already in India and aid has started pouring in.... Ever heard of hathi kay danth khanay kay aur, aur dekhanay kay aur.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Abdali: *
India is trying to be something it is not.... All the effected countries, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Sri Lanka are richer have more resources and better living conditions then India but they welcomed help... BTW international aids agencies are already in India and aid has started pouring in.... Ever heard of hathi kay danth khanay kay aur, aur dekhanay kay aur.
[/QUOTE]
just curious here.....so the seething anti-India hatred that emanates from virtually every one of your posts, and clearly all of your tsunami-related posts, must be rooted in your heartfelt concern for the well-being of distaster-stricken Indian citizens, right?
what a big heart you have...such admirable concern for your arch-rival's citizens, i hope you get rewarded.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by nikhil25: *
just curious here.....so the seething anti-India hatred that emanates from virtually every one of your posts, and clearly all of your tsunami-related posts, must be rooted in your heartfelt concern for the well-being of distaster-stricken Indian citizens, right?
what a big heart you have...such admirable concern for your arch-rival's citizens, i hope you get rewarded.
[/QUOTE]
Let me start right at the top and see which of my post is full of hatred. Wait I won't do that let the guppies be the judge. Seems like I touched a nerve.... right...
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Abdali: *
Let me start right at the top and see which of my post is full of hatred. Wait I won't do that let the guppies be the judge. Seems like I touched a nerve.... right...
[/QUOTE]
im referring to the aggregate hatred in your track record. why futilely deny the obvious?
guys please stay on the damn topic, enough of this childish bakwaas and tangents
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by nikhil25: *
im referring to the aggregate hatred in your track record. why futilely deny the obvious?
[/QUOTE]
you are BSing because truth is painful.... Go right at the top and prove which part is hatred or just shutup.....
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Abdali: *
India is trying to be something it is not.... All the effected countries, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Sri Lanka are richer have more resources and better living conditions then India but they welcomed help... BTW international aids agencies are already in India and aid has started pouring in.... Ever heard of hathi kay danth khanay kay aur, aur dekhanay kay aur.
[/QUOTE]
Abdali, India thinks it can manage the relief operations on its own and besides India would rather not have foreign relief workers around its naval and airforce base in the Andamans. But if you are worried that India would let its citizens suffer due to lack of resources, you can put your worries at ease. And where it is written that all countries should act alike, all countries have their own paths to take. India is trying to be something it wants to be and shall be though it has not arrived yet.
My point exactly…posts 10 + 11
who says no money is not avialable?
India and Pakistan spend billions on weapons while aid groups struggle for funds to fight polio and tuberculosis.
When India signed a contract to buy a $1-billion military radar system last month, foreign aid agencies were still searching for $50 million in donations to defeat the country’s polio scourge. Across the border, Pakistan’s armed forces were updating their multibillion-dollar shopping list, including a request for U.S.-made F-16 jets, while aid groups fighting a tuberculosis epidemic struggled against a lethal funding gap
If India is self sufficent and can provide aid for its poor than its great.
Any country that can be self sufficent and not rely on western governments is making the first steps to real independence and cut its reliance on the colonial powers.
But reality is that india has many poor just like pakistan and tackling this poverty of millions will show which country really is a power on the world stage or just a country trying to punch above its weight!
India wants all credit for tsunami relief operations
By Iftikhar Gilani
NEW DELHI: India, which had refused international aid for its tsunami victims, has been helping its neighbours with relief work in an attempt to project an image of a regional superpower.
The Indian government had even refused an aid offer from China which offered a $3 million aid package for tsunami victims in India. It has now joined in relief operations being carried out by the United States, Australia and Japan. Diplomats said the motive behind this move is India’s urge to be recognised as a major power in the Indian Ocean along with these countries. The Indian navy has launched four rescue and relief operations — The Operation Seawave (along the Andamans cost), Operation Rainbow in Sri Lanka, Operation Castor in the Maldives and the Operation Gambhir in Indonesia..
Army sources said that India was using Israeli-built Searcher Mark II drones to assess the damage from the mishap.
In the Andamans islands, where a unified tri-service command was headquartered, India has decided to set up an integrated relief command under Vice-Admiral Raman Puri, the chief of the integrated defence staff.
India is also uncomfortable with the proposed visit of a high-level team from Washington to the affected areas.
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_2-1-2005_pg7_43
Bush refers to Australia as his ‘Deputy Sheriff’ in the Asia-Pac region. That is because it is the only White, English speaking, Christian democracy in the region. India wants to join the big boys. Should it then be called Bush’s ‘Gunda’ in the Indian Ocean region.
Yeah and this billa bong sherriff is spat on everyday.
Indonesia, malaysia and rest of the region can't stand the sight of Australia invading stealing east timor because of oil surprise surprise don't belive all the hype its for humanitarian reasons yeah right ask the aboriginies how australians treat them in their own backyard and basically acting like a colonial dog in the area.
If you ever have opportunity of speaking to people from asia pacific area ask them what they think of Australia and you will get some words which might offend you.
Re: Why is India rejecting any foreign Aid help?
india doesnt need aid workers to help out on the mainland - affected areas arent cut off, relief workers have done quite an impressive job so far. the andaman islands are where help is needed, but taking outside help wouldnt make any difference given how remote and scattered the populations affected are on them - they would still need indian armed forces helcopters and boats - which is the bottleneck in either case.