Why is America the world’s policeman?

Do you’ll accept this theory why America is the super power? If America was not there who would do the things America does.


World Policeman – If Not Us, Who?

David C. Stolinsky, M.D.
Monday, April 7, 2003

When a person – or a nation – undertakes a task, is it because of a narcissistic assumption that no one else can do the task as well? Or is it because of a realistic appraisal that no one else will do the task at all?

Why is America the world’s only superpower? Is it because we destroyed the other superpowers in aggressive wars? No, it’s because we have the world’s most successful economic system, and we devote about 4 percent of our gross domestic product to defense.

Many other nations saddled their economies with the inefficiencies of socialism. At the same time, they decided to leave the burden of defense to somebody else – or to no one. All they knew was that they didn’t want it.

Why is America the world’s policeman? Is it because we forced the U.N. to give up this role? No, it’s because the U.N. and its other members have repeatedly proved themselves unable or unwilling to fulfill the role.

When bloodshed and “ethnic cleansing” broke out in Bosnia and Kosovo, did the U.N. or NATO take effective action? No, they left us to do the heavy lifting.

When Iraq developed weapons of mass destruction, the U.N. responded with 12 years of resolutions and threats of “serious consequences.” What were the “serious consequences” the U.N. had in mind – no TV for a week?

When all this came to nothing, who is finally disarming Iraq? We are, with the help of Britain.

And where we did not intervene, what happened? Who stopped the ethnic slaughter in Rwanda, or the massacre and enslavement of blacks in Sudan? Nobody did.

We didn’t grab the badge of world policeman and rip it off the shirt of the U.N. or of any nation. We found it in the gutter, where it had been discarded and abandoned. We picked it up, polished it and looked around to see if anyone wanted it. When no one claimed it, we pinned it on our own shirt.

Was that hubris, or the shouldering of a responsibility that no one else wanted?

Was that arrogance, or the recognition of a need that no one else was filling?

Was that imperialism, or the realization that an amoral world can’t last long without a policeman? Centuries ago, the world could survive without a policeman – but not in the age of nuclear bombs, nerve gas, biological weapons and long-range missiles.

If you are small and weak, you may have to tolerate bullies. But if you’re the biggest kid in the schoolyard, you don’t have to. What’s more, you shouldn’t tolerate them, even if they leave you alone and bully the smaller kids. And if the bullies aren’t afraid of you, the weaker kids will be in trouble, and eventually so will you.

As the strongest kid, it’s your duty to fight bullies. If you don’t, who will?

We are the biggest kid in the schoolyard. In part, this may be luck. In part, it may be due to the good upbringing our parents provided for us. And there may be a deeper reason as well – it may represent God’s favor.

But whatever the reason, we are the strongest, and that carries responsibilities. If we choose not to shoulder them, that doesn’t mean we have no responsibilities – it means we are shirking them. The responsibilities remain ours, whatever we do.

The far left doesn’t want us to be the world’s policeman because it believes we aren’t worthy to be. The far right doesn’t want us to be because it believes the world isn’t worth policing. But the net result is the same – we do nothing, and the world sinks into anarchy.

The far left believes people wouldn’t hate us if only we shackled our economy with socialism. But they would hate us even more, because then we couldn’t afford to bail them out of their wars, famines and economic disasters.

The far right believes people wouldn’t hate us if only we retreated behind closed borders. But they would hate us even more, because then we wouldn’t care enough to bail them out of their wars, famines and economic disasters.

Extremes of both left and right make the error of thinking that people hate us for what we do. But people hate us for who we are – Americans who believe in political freedom, economic freedom, religious freedom, women’s rights and the importance of the individual. The haters believe in the opposite values.

To stop being hated, we’d have to stop being who we are.

Some go so far as to claim that Iraqis and other Third World peoples really don’t want freedom. In other words, “advanced” white people of European ancestry can handle freedom, but those with darker skins are better off under authoritarian rulers. Let’s be honest – there’s racism here, disguised as “multiculturalism.”

Britain retains its moral compass and will help us but no longer has the strength to do the job alone. Australia will help, too, but not Canada, unless it stops thinking like France. Speaking French is one thing; thinking French is quite another.

France lost its moral compass and not only won’t help, but also tries to block us in its futile attempt to remain relevant. But pomposity isn’t a substitute for greatness. Being big in the world of cheese isn’t the same as being a big cheese.

Germany has no moral compass, so the fact that it has become pacifist is a blessing for the world.

Russia is a shadow of its former self. If it can manage to get its economy out of the Marxist basement, it won’t have to make money by selling weapons to terrorist states. Perhaps then it may become a force for good in the world, but that’s a big “perhaps.”

Eastern Europe remembers tyranny only too well, and in the future it may support us with more than words. Spain and Italy will help to the degree they are able.

Scandinavia, except for Denmark, is too concerned with socialism to worry about freedom. In the end, equality and freedom are competing goals.

India is a huge nation and deserves France’s seat on the Security Council. If it loses its fear of aligning itself with anyone, it could be a major force for good.

Japan has economic troubles, and North Korea is threatening it with missiles. But judging by the past, it may be fortunate that Japan is preoccupied.

China is too intent on an ethnocentric pursuit of power to be of help. We will be lucky if China isn’t a major obstacle.

The U.N. should be called the D.G. – the disunited governments. Most of its members are thugs and dictators of various types. We are fortunate indeed that the U.N. has no credible military force; it would be misused.

Libya heads the U.N. Human Rights Commission, and Iraq heads the Disarmament Conference. Would you want such an amoral organization to police the world? Amoral policemen are dangerous.

Perhaps some future world body will be composed of free nations. Until then, let the U.N. remain weak – it’s a lot safer that way.

And that leaves us as world policeman. Whether by choice or by default, we’re it. We can’t do everything everywhere, but that doesn’t mean we should do nothing anywhere. We are not excused from doing what we can.

The cop who disgustedly throws away his badge is a Hollywood staple. We recall Gary Cooper in “High Noon.” He faced down the criminals alone, then tossed his badge into the gutter and left the cowardly townspeople behind. We recall Clint Eastwood in “Dirty Harry.” He caught the killer despite his bosses, then tossed his badge into San Francisco Bay and left the bumbling bureaucrats behind.

Throwing away your badge makes a self-righteous gesture, but it accomplishes nothing except to remove a policeman from the world.

The opposite image is more relevant today. It’s the image of an older John Wayne in “True Grit.” He comes out of retirement to help a young woman find her father’s murderers.

It’s the image of someone who keeps the badge pinned to his shirt.

Like Wayne’s character, we’re tired and really don’t want to be a U.S. Marshal any more. And like him, we’re not as young as we were; we’re out of shape, overweight, and some of us drink too much.

But also like him, when troubled people come to us and ask us to bring their loved ones’ murderers to justice, we just can’t say no. If we don’t do it, who will?

Dr. Stolinsky writes on political and social issues. He may be contacted at [email protected].
Why is America the world’s policeman?

So true....It is time to speak loudly and carry a big stick.

I think Saddam Fidayeen should be given the job of World Policing. Toyota stock will rise 100% over night at the sight of these idiots banging Toyota pickup trucks into tanks.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Yogi: *
I think Saddam Fidayeen should be given the job of World Policing. Toyota stock will rise 100% over night at the sight of these idiots banging Toyota pickup trucks into tanks.
[/QUOTE]

LOL Yogi,

But you know? Those Iraqi's are darn brave also, and I bet the Toyota's are pretty fast across the desert.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by AvgAmericanGirl: *

LOL Yogi,

But you know? Those Iraqi's are darn brave also, and I bet the Toyota's are pretty fast across the desert.
[/QUOTE]

lessthanavgamericangirl, at last you show your true colors. You started off agianst this war, however, you find humor in the misery of Iraqi people. Shame on you and your likes.

Re: Why is America the world’s policeman?

***Originally posted by durango: *
....
Why is America the world’s only superpower? Is it because we destroyed the other superpowers in aggressive wars? No, it’s because we have the world’s most successful economic system, and we devote about 4 percent of our gross domestic product to defense

.....

Why is America the world’s policeman? Is it because we forced the U.N. to give up this role? No, it’s because the U.N. and its other members have repeatedly proved themselves unable or unwilling to fulfill the role.
...**

No because you make UN irrelevant whenever you want, and impose it on others when it suits you.

.....
When Iraq developed weapons of mass destruction, the U.N. responded with 12 years of resolutions and threats of "serious consequences." What were the "serious consequences" the U.N. had in mind – no TV for a week?

BS. Iraq used them in 1980-1988 while US was still pumping Iraq. Sanctions were only placed after 1991 Gulf War episode I.

When all this came to nothing, who is finally disarming Iraq? We are, with the help of Britain.

Great. After seeing Iraq disarming faster than thought, invade it and disarm it..... way to go policeman.

......
As the strongest kid, it’s your duty to fight bullies. If you don’t, who will?

All the gangster thinking speaking out lout.

....
The far right believes people wouldn’t hate us if only we retreated behind closed borders. But they would hate us even more, because then we wouldn’t care enough to bail them out of their wars, famines and economic disasters.

No, far right says to go and destroy nations opposing US.

..... But people hate us for who we are – Americans who believe in political freedom, economic freedom, religious freedom, women’s rights and the importance of the individual....

No, "haters" hate because of hypocricy.

**...
France lost its moral compass and not only won’t help, but also tries to block us in its futile attempt to remain relevant. But pomposity isn’t a substitute for greatness. Being big in the world of cheese isn’t the same as being a big cheese.

Germany has no moral compass, so the fact that it has become pacifist is a blessing for the world.**

That is just because of "conflict of interests".

.....

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Kaleem: *

lessthanavgamericangirl, at last you show your true colors. You started off agianst this war, however, you find humor in the misery of Iraqi people. Shame on you and your likes.
[/QUOTE]
AAG is one of few posters here who shows compassion and understanding for all sides. Shame on you for judging her based on one post which you misinterpreted. Your own posts show some vivid colors as well, so be careful before you judge someone else's integrity Mr. less-than-righteous Kaleem

and we all know how corrupt american police is :-)

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Kaleem: *

lessthanavgamericangirl, at last you show your true colors. You started off agianst this war, however, you find humor in the misery of Iraqi people. Shame on you and your likes.
[/QUOTE]

Kaleem,

I didn't mean it that way. I meant that I thought the Iraqi fighters were exceedingly brave. Absolutely.

I do not find humor in suffering of any one. And I am offended at that remark.

I was laughing about the Toyota stock going up in price. And how dare me laugh? I shouldn't have. And I don't have any investments in Toyota. I'd be lucky if I am able to retire someday without becoming a bag lady.

It is simply because the rest of the world puts up with it, just as the world will do nothing about Bush's latest war crimes attacking a civilian area just to attempt to kill Saddam Husein and his sons.

The world will quitely watch as Adolf Bush sweeps across the Middle East, taking out one country at the time.

^ finally there is a moderate voice around here :D

THERE is absolutely no problem if usa is worlds only policeman there must be a police man to police the rogue states and states that are tyranical but the question is? is the police man a honest policeman ? or a corrupt policeman?
does the police let one murderer (israel) get away after numerous murderers and convicts others without a trail

America is NOT the Worlds Policeman, America is the World's Bully!