Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising

[shriek11]

Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising

Stir crazy, I hope you go read your own unbiased indian accounts and see indian special forces and even regular bombardment of E. Pakistan had begun on 22nd November 1971. You indian lot are hopeless. People in Pakistan are more open minded [some feat] than you so-called educated lot! You are the same people who don’t admit anything is wrong in kashmir or NE india!

[Moonshiner]

Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising

I As to people laughing at the statement that India is peace loving nation

Aray bhai, not really laughing too much at the statement, but laughing at the poster saying it. Understand?

[StirCrasy]

Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising

@shriek11

Stir crazy, I hope you go read your own unbiased indian accounts and see indian special forces and even regular bombardment of E. Pakistan had begun on 22nd November 1971.

Tell me what you want me read specifically and I will do so. In the mean time a simple google turns up a lot of evidence that Pakistan attacked first. Here is a book refernce that came up during that search, from the name of which it is clearly not biased to India.

The Current Legal Regulation of the Use of Force

Check out page 63 (I can’t copy paste it since it is a copyright image) but if you google “bombardment in east pakistan in 1971” you will get this page image.

@shriek11

You indian lot are hopeless. People in Pakistan are more open minded [some feat] than you so-called educated lot! You are the same people who don’t admit anything is wrong in kashmir or NE india! :rotfl:

I don’t think Indians are hopeless at all. the joke is on you loud one! Run a poll even within gupshup and see how many think Indians are hopeless! If anything, we are getting over confident (which is the opposite of hopelessness).

You can say anything you want to argue but facts are facts.