Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
Btw, be careful if you step into awghanistan! Due to the new influx of bolly movies, pathans [awghans] are going to make you their gurlfrend more than anything. We already had another indian deployed in a counsulate from another forum who got "lost" in awghanistan too! :D
As of now it is you who has to careful of them:D
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
I am not setting up a counsulate there so....?
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
actually the fact that a pakistani journalist would write crap like this and have it published in an indian publication is proof that pakistani journalists are on the payroll of indian agencies. moreover, describing the mom-and-pop type terrrorist operation in baluchistan as an insurgency is an insult to genuine insurgencies everywhere. good news is that baluchi terrorists have almost been eliminated and the person responsible for overseeing the actions against them has now been made governor of nwfp where he is expected to implement strategy followed in baluchistan.
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
come on guys. we do have better things to do than be bothered about Pakistan - Baluchistan troubles. Why should we, what will we gain by it? We have seen how Pakistani support of mujahideen types in India (Kashmir) turned tables and is biting their own backside now....why would we commit the same mistake?
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
Because Indians have done it before with sri lanka, didn't they?
Btw, india's dream is to destabilize pakistan through afghanistan and that was long before kashmir or even 1971!
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
if Pakistan gets completely destabilized now, India would suffer too. I'm sure Pakistan wouldn't be able to contain those terrorists/militants and they would find a way to get across the border like they have before.
Imagine what would happen if those nukes get into the wrong hands....
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
come on guys. we do have better things to do than be bothered about Pakistan - Baluchistan troubles. Why should we, what will we gain by it? We have seen how Pakistani support of mujahideen types in India (Kashmir) turned tables and is biting their own backside now....why would we commit the same mistake?
so what do you suggest??..not to support some sort of insurgency in pakistan?...Hope the answer is No. You think they are not doing it?. If yes, then orgs like ISI are a financial burden for pak govt(they have turned out to be another sort of burden..that is all together different story for pakistanis). Target should be pak military. And none else. Inshallah, they get success in their endeavour to foment some sort of trouble to pak military. Ameeen...sum ameeen!!.
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
That should be pakistans head ache. Not ours.
…Just joking:D. When America is not able to do anything about it, what can India do?..And i think all this nukes falling some militants hands is exagerrated some what. It would have fallen into militants hands by now if at all it had to. Moreover, those nukes in wrong hands only doesn’t mean other countries in trouble, it is pakistan itself which could be target of it’s own nukes.
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
Who says they dont have the dirty bombs already!? One shouldnt fool around with such reports. It is a problem and there are enough countries like DRNK, who could sell these dirty bombs to terrorists. If they havent done It already!
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
so who really cares out of anyone of yous above who replied …
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
What i fail to understand what are the problems for India due to Gawadar? now we have to seek permission from indians to built a commercial port???? or even a defence one?
The Glorious paki army is not ready to allow the Balochs to run their own province. All the natural resources and projects are directly controlled by Islamabad and the provincial governmet has no say in all these projects. India is not the problem, paki army is the main reason of all the ailments that have plagued this beautiful land of Balochs, Pahstuns and Brohis.
The great delhite commondo :) once called Akbar Bugti a pygmy, but the reality bites him in his face whenever he sees himself in mirror.
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
Who died in a cave like a coward? 
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
Let's not ignore or laugh of the Balochs concerns.
It is a fair one that in a small place as Gwdar if the migrants out number the locals, tey will be Red Indianuzed. So what is the problem in accepting no local voting rights or lesser voting rights for migrant labor?
If you want Baluchistan to behave as part of Pakistan, they should be treated as such too!
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
The great delhite commondo :) once called Akbar Bugti a pygmy, but the reality bites him in his face whenever he sees himself in mirror.
I hope you are not referring to Mushy here. Its okay to call him names but atleast don't associate him with another country, he is still a Pakistani citizen, unlike some morons who call Pakistan a mistake and get faaran country's citizenship and still run a political party.
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
surely not spongebob
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
Let's not ignore or laugh of the Balochs concerns.
It is a fair one that in a small place as Gwdar if the migrants out number the locals, tey will be Red Indianuzed. So what is the problem in accepting no local voting rights or lesser voting rights for migrant labor?
If you want Baluchistan to behave as part of Pakistan, they should be treated as such too!
How do you define lesser voting rights?
Of course, preference should be given to locals who want to work unlike in karachi where people are still imported from rural villages to run the city bureaucracy, police etc.
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
I don't know why you guys have to drag India's name into this. It is the defence leadership's job to watch the surroundings and alert the civilian leadership and people to developments. That is exactly and all that our commander did. Because of the known nexus between Pakistan and China, he was cautioned everyone in India to a potential risk.
As to people laughing at the statement that India is peace loving nation - Did India start any of the three wars that have been waged? No. Who asked you to misadventure into Kargil? Defending ourselves does not makes any less of a peace loving nation.
Jai Hind
Sri Rama Jayam
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
So you are even denying 1971?
Re: Why India is not involved in the Baloch uprising
^ Shriek11: if your question is who started the 1971 war here are the highlights in sequence, which clearly establishes that Pakistan started it:
1970: Awami League won elections and right to for Pakistan govt; Bhutto refused
Mar 25, 1971 - Pak Military started crackdown; Awami League banned! Mujib arrested
Mar 27, 1971 - E.Pakistan reacts; Mukhtibahini formed; Govt in exile
Mar to Dec 1971 - Pak military atrocity in BD continues; 10Million refugees stream into India; Economic and border instability and law and order issues prop up as a result in India; India expresses support of Awami League that rightfully won the elections
Aug 9, 1971 - In response to US promising arms and aid to West Pakistan, India signs treaty with USSR thus checkmating the Pakistan-China-US aggressive posture; UK and France breahaway from the US in response to Mrs.Gandhi's efforts
Nov 23 1971 - Yahya declares emergency and asks people of Pakistan to be ready for war!
Dec 3, 1971 - PAF attacks IAF bases - in three waves between 17:39 and 23:00 hrs, the strikes were targeted against 11 Indian Airbases in addittion to some radar stations.
Can you tell me based on the above sequence, who started the 1971 war?