Re: Why India has not Taken On Pakistan
Oil hota tu India ka abba aa jaata, wink
Woh tau pehle hi wahan maujood hai,'wink2'
Re: Why India has not Taken On Pakistan
Let's take a scenario if India takes over Pakistan.................
The people would definitely resist being Indian. How would India manage such a large population which is anti-Indian?
Re: Why India has not Taken On Pakistan
India don’t have strength to take burden millions of Bengalis refugees coming from East Pakistan that time, so they attacked and libereated BD, now if you guys come to india as a refugee to escape taleban then india comes into picture,
anyway you can’t goto other border(Afghanistan) 
:CareBear:as a refugee so you have only one way left 
Re: Why India has not Taken On Pakistan
If India takes over Pakistan?
Would US and China come to Pakistan's help?
Would Ummah be on Pakistan's side?
How would Iran and Afghanistan react?
Re: Why India has not Taken On Pakistan
Was watching a programme on Headline news (Indian Channel) on the current situation in Pakistan, their Major General (r) A. K. Mehta, said that it was a good oppurtunity for Indian army to take on Pakistan at a time when most of its armed forces are along the Afghan border.
Why hasn't India done that?
Possible reasons
1- India wants to live peacefully with Pakistan.
2- India is having an economic boom ad will not loose it by engaging in a war.
3- India will prefer a proxy war rather than engaging its own military.
4- India won't like to take on Pakistan for it being a US ally.
5-All of above.
Who made this guy a Major General? The moment India tries to 'take on' Pakistan, all these extremists and the armed forces fighting them will become one to counter India. Indian interference will bring unity not disunity.
Re: Why India has not Taken On Pakistan
Who made this guy a Major General? The moment India tries to 'take on' Pakistan, all these extremists and the armed forces fighting them will become one to counter India. Indian interference will bring unity not disunity.
You mean to say only "Anti India Feelings" unites all pakistanis?
Re: Why India has not Taken On Pakistan
India ke paas aur bhi bahut kaam hei. Pakistan is just a side entertainment.
Re: Why India has not Taken On Pakistan
^^Akhand bharat is dream of Hindu Parties(BJP,RSS,Shiv sena etc) like muslim Ummah is dream of pakistan.nobody gives rat ass about it.
very true..akhand bharat is useless, baseless, absurd idea of all those insecular parties which never fits in modern india. today's youth is more inclined to carry out constructive work rather than unnecessary dig out the so called glorious, chauvistic past. there is no way pakistan and india can unite ( and including afghanistan (gandhar of mahabharata time) and bagladesh will be suicidal) whatever india have, we have to develop it to take it developed india of 2020. its fruitless to wage a war for foolish ideas of past rather than working constructively for better future.
Role of indian armed forces is very limited. they have responsibility to protect nation for external agression and terrorist activities when state machinery fails. and this role is very much understood by every state machinery in india. India is successful democracy only because it has been backed by such higly professional, disciplined and morally upright armed forces.
Re: Why India has not Taken On Pakistan
what really was general saying is.
indian army can take the opportunity to destroy the terrorist camps in PoK. u never meant full fledged war. and he was very right from his position. government's bird eye view is diffrent.
Re: Why India has not Taken On Pakistan
You mean to say only "Anti India Feelings" unites all pakistanis?
that won't happen. if india takes on pakistan, already weak paki so called government wil crumble like a house of cards. paki army is under tremondous pressure and in state of confusion. its loyality is in dubious and moral is hitting rock bottom.
Re: Why India has not Taken On Pakistan
I am no RSS person, but Akhand Bharat is my idea too and it is the vision of many Indians. I am not sure if RSS’s United India includes Pakistan and Bangladesh, where did you get this idea from.
Akhand Barat from my point of view means Nation first. It means “National Security”, Equal rights and prosperity to all. It means all working for welfare of India, and not Panjab asking for Khalistan, Kashmir wanting their own state and so on so forth.
Re: Why India has not Taken On Pakistan
^^link/proof?...where all i googled it gave a contradictory meaning to it!!
Re: Why India has not Taken On Pakistan
Akhanda Bharata (literally “Undivided India”) is a term that refers to regions that had a Hindu majority in the past, before the Muslim conquest in the Indian subcontinent and post-colonial partition. It includes all of the current Republic of India as well as the nation-states of Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Pakistan (particularly the Punjab and Sindh region), Sri Lanka and Myanmar. Apart from Afghanistan, this is basically the same as the formerly-existing Indian Empire which lasted until the end of the colonial era in India in 1947. Akhanda Bharatam is the Sanskrit name for this region.
The geographic frontiers of this region is held to range from the Himalayan region in the north to the ocean in the south, the borders of Bharatavarsha as outlined in the Vishnu Purana.
These regions tended to be predominantly influenced by Dharmic religion and culture prior to the introduction of Christianity and Islam, of which the concept of partition was created. Thus, religious and ethnic nationalism often has an influence on the concept of Akhanda Bharata. The concept is sometimes subscribed to by nationalist Indians as well as Hindu nationalists and organizations such as Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and political parties such as the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
Re: Why India has not Taken On Pakistan
^ Good link. But the map in that link doesn't seem to show Myanmar as part of epic India but shows parts of Persia. How come? I know Burma has very significant India cultural and religious based on Hinduism. For example the names (Iravadhi) is Sanskrit.
Also guys - don't take this the wrong way but it seems all parts that broke away from this definition of Bharatvarsha seem to be in turmoil! Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Myanmar (if that was part of Bharathvarsha), those parts of Iran (that were part of Bharathvarsha), Bangladesh !!!
This region has missed a truly great opportunity to be a very advanced civilization because of these splits.Instead of leading the world we are now "3rd world"!
Re: Why India has not Taken On Pakistan
Historically speaking, India has never gained any land but always gone the other way around. Statistically speaking they'll never be able to take over any country, even if it's Sri Lanka because it's just not in the blood. They like to study, fix computers for dell, design websites, work freelance for programming over guru.com and make bollywood movies.
Also down the line I can see India becoming a conflict with not just Pakistan as a country but Islam as a religion. The downfall will probably be caused from within the country igniting riots everywhere which the country is already good at.
Pakistan is headed no where, but being a key ally in the "War on Terror" it has support of non-supporters to keep another 9-11 from happening. I've read numerous articles about the good relations with Pakistan & China and secret trades that are happening almost daily between the two nations.
-my 2 cents
Re: Why India has not Taken On Pakistan
[QUOTE]
India is having an economic boom ad will not loose it by engaging in a war.
[/QUOTE]
most likely indian army can defeat the pakistan army in a few weeks but it will cost them dearly ....and ruin their economy
armughal are u sure ...backstabbers like benazir might even endorse indian action against pakistan
Re: Why India has not Taken On Pakistan
Historically speaking, India has never gained any land but always gone the other way around. Statistically speaking they'll never be able to take over any country, even if it's Sri Lanka because it's just not in the blood. They like to study, fix computers for dell, design websites, work freelance for programming over guru.com and make bollywood movies.
there is nothing on the borders of india worth conquering the mountains in north , rainforests in east and barren deserts in west
thats why the myth of peace loving indians ...their forefathers were very warlike from central asia and they always fought amongst each other way before muslims came