Re: Why India has never seen a military dictatorship
Nizam can be allowed to take the decision in the same way that the ruler of Kashmir could cede to India. India accepted Kashmir as a part of India despite not having done a referendum, giving the ruler the right to decide for his people. They didnt afford the same right to the Nizam however, and instead used military force to take Hyderabad. Its a double standard. India makes her own rules.
Siachin is an example of a boundry being crossed. It wasnt Pakistan that crossed into Siachin. And it isnt Pakistan that is perpetuating the conflict there.
There are always two sides to a conflict. Or did you think the Pakistan and India’s conflicts are the sole of fault of Pakistan?