Why I do not accept Ahmadiyyat?

Society Religion & Philosophy
1

This is I received in my email.
**
img142.imageshack.us/img142/6748/firqadz6.gif**

2

I have not understood your point. There are sects in every school; sunnis, shias and others and various schools bitterly fight with each other from time to time and have declared each other kafir, what is your complaint specially with Ahmadis?

By your standard no one should accept Islam as various sects have been unable to agree on the correct beliefs or even on the definition of a Muslim.

Please have a read;

Reluctantly (as this could be hurtful to some) I can give you much stronger reason why one may not want to be a Sunni;

Islamic terrorism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

3

I have read this. I think it is written by some ahmedi person. One of the weakest logic I have ever seen to join or leave a religion. Because there is hardly (at least I havnt seen) a relegion without sects. The biggest difference between Muslims and Ahmedia firqa is:-

Muslims believe Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H), the last prophet.
Ahmedis do not believe.

The logic that one shouldnt be Ahmedi bcoz they got secs is @$#%@$#. Its simple Ahmedi are non-Muslims. And in that text the, the writer was accepting that Mirza is true in his beliefs. Only bcoz more than 100 years passed, so we shouldnt accept it. WHAT A LOGICAL BELIEF.

Now as far as the sunni-shia relation is concerned, its true that they do blame each other for NOT having right beliefs. But there are only 0.1% people who would say that the opposite sect is kafir. JUST SOME IGNORANT MUSLIMS WILL SAY THIS.

test01 You say that they still do not agree on the Definiton of Muslim. Totally WRONG
Its simple.
"Allah is One and Muhammad (P.B.U.H) is last Prophet."

Which sect of Muslim do not believe the above Definition
Moreover sects are foretold in Hadees Shareef.

This text is not even worth reading. Even a child with good belief will reject it.

Regards
Lord

4

This is the biggest lie of the history of Islam. Just by repeating it too many times you can not turn it into truth.

See this;

and see what these people

Mawlana Rumi
Ibn Arabi
Hazrat Imam Abu Ja’far Sadiq
Hazrat Shah Wali Ullah Muhaddith of Dehli
Hazrat Maulana Faranghi Mahal
Imam Raghib
Muhammad Qasim Nanotwi

say about possibility of a prophet coming, here; www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seal_of_the_Prophets

Why?

These 0.1% are actually the ulema of their relevant sects and there are fatwas available by the ulema of various sects declaring each other kafir. Religion is not democracy and majority does not decide right or wrong, rather its the 0.1% the ulema who decide. See this link to read what each sect thinks of the other; Freedom of Religion, Apostasy and Islam - Google Book Search

Your answer given above. Please declare those personalities given above (who believe a non law bearing prophet can come) as non-Muslim then we can talk on this. Be honest, if anyone denying khatm-e-nabuwat is non-Muslim then these personalities are also non-Muslim.

5

Please listen to this;

Note at 4:02 where he mentions Ibn arabi’s belief that a non law bearing prophet can still come. Please declare ibn arabi non-Muslim now and also all those scholars who do not consider Ibn Arab non-Muslim despite his denial of khatm-e-nabuwat.

Also note at 4:28 he refers to Ahmadis (without mentioning name) and says what more do they (Ahmadis) believe than what these Sufis believe?

Timepass- December 2012
6

Brother student, welcome to the forum. As you seem to be new to this forum, let me repeat for you what has been said earlier. As mentioned in the Quran, when truth comes falsehood itself perishes. Let us follow the sunnah of the prophet (saw) who used to focus only on preaching good, not on criticizing non-Muslims or pointing out at munafiqeen. Islam has spread through good manners and practical examples. No where in the history do we find a person who accepted Islam only because he was criticized. If we consider anyone to be non-Muslim, let us become a practical example for them, and leave the decision of truth part to themselves.

The following might help in understanding views from both sides. Also these threads would help us in understanding why all of them were ultimately closed and why such debates should not be a priority for a Muslim of present age, specially when the ummah is going through its worst time ever in the history.

http://www.paklinks.com/gs/religion-scripture/260752-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-qadiani-islam.html

http://www.paklinks.com/gs/religion-scripture/295753-ahmadi-thread.html

http://www.paklinks.com/gs/religion-scripture/286627-100-years-ahmadi-religion.html

http://www.paklinks.com/gs/religion-scripture/255539-mirza-gaqs-followers-avoiding-these-question.html

http://www.paklinks.com/gs/religion-scripture/256780-lets-talk-ahmadiyyat-detail.html

http://www.paklinks.com/gs/religion-scripture/243575-fall-ahmadiyya-community.html

http://www.paklinks.com/gs/religion-scripture/252108-ahmadiyyo-se-sawal.html

http://www.paklinks.com/gs/religion-scripture/191560-qadyani-concept-all-information-sunni-muslims.html

http://www.paklinks.com/gs/religion-scripture/106026-ahmadiyyat-islam.html

http://www.paklinks.com/gs/religion-scripture/70456-why-ahmadis-arent-muslim.html