Even though England collapsed in quite unbelievable fashion yesterday, it must be said that England generally compete against Australia in Australia better than most other test teams including South Africa. I mean even though England were comprehensively outplayed in the first test at Brisbane, the match still finished on the 5th day and the second test almost went the whole distance. Infact most of England’s Ashes tests in Australia go into a 5th day. It’s another matter that they go on to lose the majority of those tests but atleast they don’t surrender as abjectly as we do. Secondly England somehow manage to squeeze atleast one test win in every away Ashes series. You have to go back to the days of Sarfraz and Imran in the late 70s/early 80s to look for Pakistan’s last test (let alone series) win in Australia i.e. despite having the two W’s in the 90s we have been underperforming in tests in Australia for almost three decades. More often than not it’s our batting that let’s the team down.
During Pakistan’s last outing there in 2004, a disastrous one, all three tests finished inside 4 days including that shambolic 72 all out in the second innings of the first test at Perth. I know Inzi missed the second and third test and Shoaib missed the third test but that surely does n’t excuse our perennial inability to match Australia in Australia.
(First test, Perth)
http://www.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2004-05/PAK_IN_AUS/SCORECARDS/PAK_AUS_T1_16-20DEC2004.html
(Second test, Melbourne)
http://www.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2004-05/PAK_IN_AUS/SCORECARDS/PAK_AUS_T2_26-30DEC2004.html
(Third test, Sydney)
http://www.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2004-05/PAK_IN_AUS/SCORECARDS/PAK_AUS_T3_02-06JAN2005.html
I mean we were not even in a position to draw any of the games (like England were at Adelaide)
The 1999-2000 series was no different although we were denied victory in the second test by some dubious umpiring decisions (the age of one home and one neutral umpire)
Infact we have lost all of the last 9 tests against Australia!
India won a test in Sydney in 2003 albeit against an Aussie attack minus McGrath and Warne. And If I am not mistaken NZ generally do better than us in Australia.
I think one of the reasons for our poor performance is that our players seem to take more time to adapt to playing conditions in Australia and because we only play a three-test series, by the time they are beginning to find their feet in Australia, the series is effectively over. As you can see, Pakistan’s best batting performance was in the third test at Sydney (300+ totals in both innings) but still not good enough to match Australia.
Perhaps we should arrive in Australia (and for that matter in SA and England) atleast 3-4 weeks before the start of the first international game. but then our batters generally do well in NZ (and England) which is a bit puzzling.
This is not a conspiracy thread. I just want honest opinions on why you think Pakistan do worse in Australia than most other test teams.
Your thoughts…