Uncle Sam is here to contain China, not the Arabs. Arabs are dumbass backwards camel jockeys. They’ve contained themselves. Iran’s image is already in bad shape. If you look out into the rest of the world, you will see from which locations America is trying to contain China. Let me list a few examples: TAIWAN; Japan; South Korea. All anti-Chinese, heavily influenced by the U.S. Now the Chinese economy is booming, expected to take over the American economy soon, and growing at the rate of almost 10% per annum, China needs energy. Where does it look? The middle east; and Gwadar being the gateway. Now America has Afghanistan unders its control - bordering Balochistan, very close to Gwadar. U.S controls Iraq aswell, now headed for Iran. Arab dumbasses already kiss American ass, so no need for U.S to go there. Basically, what America is doing is disallowing China to enter the middle-east. Not having this energy will serve as a major blow to the Chinese economy. Indians won’t matter that much. America will use it like a 2cent crack whore to contain China, and China being our ally will help us contain India. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, India has been looking to the West. I wouldn’t be surprised if India ended its ties with Russia. India will become America’s bitch #2 after Israel, and by that time Iran will have lost all ties with India, and that LNG deal maybe as good as dead.
[quote=“_Lahore_Ka_Cheetah”]
Now the Chinese economy is booming, expected to take over the American economy soon, and growing at the rate of almost 10% per QUOTE]
Chinese economy booms as long US lets it boom. The day US puts tarifs on Chinese goods flooding US market, Chinese boom is over.
How come a cheet from Lahore knows all about this but Iranians don’t? you happen to have too much emotions for China but no brains.
Even if we freeze US at the current level $2,500 billions a year, china will need 24.5 years to grow from $250 billion/year at a consistent 10% a year growth.
You think US will just sit around on a heap of sand like bunch of nomadic Biddus?
US pressure, what else. India too does not abide by principles, just self interest, like everyone else.
"US linked deal with India to Iran vote: Transcripts of House hearings
The US had made it obvious to India, while negotiating the July 18 nuclear deal, that it will have to vote against Iran’s nuclear programme if it wants atomic reactors from Washington.
The detailed transcripts of two recent hearings of the US House International Relations Committee show that by Sept 8, 11 days before India voted against Iran at the International Atomic Energy Agency’s meeting in Vienna, officials in Washington knew that New Delhi would support the US position on this issue.
…
Mr Lantos and other lawmakers had threatened not to back the July 18 nuclear deal unless India sided with the US against Iran. These latest remarks echo the statement issued by Mr Lantos soon after India voted against Iran in the IAEA meeting, where he not only took credit for New Delhi’s turnaround but also put the Indian government on notice for the next IAEA meeting in November."