This is an editorial from SA paper. Strange reaction from a country that has one the most stringent requirements to get through for even a stop over! A woman by herself is not even allowed in the kingdom for sightseeing even for a stopover! Even Minata the transportation secretary had to remove his shoes and belt to go through airport security. Today Mahthir of Malaysia was complaining that his deputy had to remove his shoes!!! What a strange reaction! All over the net one can get to countless number of sites where the Ulema are posting Khutabas against the christians, jews and pagans. And then to turn around and complain about we are not being treated nicely!!! What a strange reaction!
http://www.arabnews.com/Article.asp?ID=19108
Editorial: US suspicions
2 October 2002
America’s suspicion of everyone beyond its borders seems to reaching absurd proportions. The clearest demonstration of this has come with its treatment of its visitors, specifically its guests from Muslim countries. Washington has now announced new guidance for immigration authorities, which makes it almost certain that this discrimination will become a regular fact of life for Muslim arriving at US borders.
The understandable international complaints have begun. Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad has renewed his earlier protest, which was prompted by the humiliating treatment of his deputy Ahmad Abdullah Badawi, who was ordered to remove his belt and shoes before being allowed to board a Los Angeles flight to New York. If a top government minister travelling on a diplomatic passport can be subjected to such cavalier usage, what chance has the ordinary Muslim traveler ?
It must be suspected that the US authorities have codified the hard-line behavior of their immigration people, as a result of the outstanding failure of the FBI and CIA to keep track of known Al-Qaeda members who entered the country before the bombing. Unfortunately, with America in a constant state of near hysterical terrorist alert, it is unlikely that these new regulations will achieve anything more than giving the utmost annoyance and very often offense to many of its visitors.
With more than 350 entry points into the country, by land, sea and air, the attempt to monitor arrivals and departures effectively, is going to prove a bureaucratic nightmare. Officials nervous of censure from their bosses are likely to behave with ever more imperiousness than used to be the case. It was after all, never pleasant standing in the “foreign nationals arrival” queue waiting to be processed by an often abrupt and humorless official. And while this vast formal edifice is in place, it is likely that those who wish to the United States harm, will find secret ways to cross its extensive land borders or come ashore on its thousands of miles of coastline.
Of course, Washington is not alone in this. Security at European airports has been tightened notably and once again there is clear discrimination toward Muslims. Indeed throughout Europe we are seeing a growing backlash against all foreigners, as epitomized by the increasingly unsympathetic treatment of asylum seekers, who are now automatically assumed to be economic migrants and have to go to considerable lengths to prove their asylum claims.
However, though they are still feared, the Europeans are not new to terror attacks. By contrast, with the exception of the Oklahoma bombing, the United States had not known terrorism until Sept. 11 2001. Now the land of the free, which drew its people from every corner of the globe, is in the ironic position erecting barriers to the free movement of visitors, especially from the Muslim world. The danger here is quite clear. Once automatic and officially sanctioned suspicion becomes the norm for new arrivals, the official focus could turn upon those Muslims who are US citizens. Institutionalized discrimination against these people is now but a relatively small step and it is one that was taken once before, when in 1941 the US treated loyal Japanese-Americans with heartless bigotry.