1- The whole reason of me posting the sites where you brought the posts, was to show multiple sites are saying exactly the same thing, exactly the same words and your comments were missing to help readers what your take on it was. Mere copy-pasting can be done by anyone and the sites can be searched by anyone if interested. Only your understanding with link or part of the content of link would have been sufficient.
2-As to what you and Psyah have been discussing I must say I had not been following since my arguments may not be along the same line as Psyah bahi and you and him had been going on with the line of argument which I had not intended especially where creation, religious or whatever theory is discussed.
3- I said repeatedly science has problem which science has to clear up. No need whatsoever to bring religion/creationists here.
4- I see when ‘scientists’ fail to prove this theory they make up new ways to define evolution for example evolution is not Darwinism.
(We have a new term now Darwinism to separate it from Evolution)
Also, now evolutionists are trying to appease thoe who are religious (creationists) by saying evolution and religions can co-exist.
5- I really do not care what Modudi, Dr. Israr or any religious perdon from ANY RELIGION thinks.
All I care is what scienctists say and how scientists can back up their claims scientifically WITHOUT makng up the definition along the way as it suits their made up theory and **yet unable to get to the final authentic and valid proof.
**6- You claimed 99.8% of scientists believe evolution.
You said:
“These are the kind of foot prints which have convinced 99.8% of scientist with respectable credentials to accept evolution as a highly probable phenomenon.” (this and Post 559)
To my understanding 99.8% of only America’s scientists who are in this field of earth and life believe it to be valid.
Yazdi bhai! the definition of evolution is made in such a way that even those who believe 100% on these scientists have some confusion about it.
So far what has been said and presented is like pieces of a puzzle and everytime something is presented, the conclusion/claim is made that evolution is valid.