Sindh gets the name from river Sindhu, vedic name is sindhsagar, as river sindh meets sea in this region:)
The entire history of Aryan Invasion was more promoted by the british historian as majority of north Indian looked different from Dravidians, the mention of Dravid desh in manusmritis clearly points out that they knew about superiority of Dravidians:), secondly aryans are considered to be martially inclined, but they entered in Punjab and wrote vedas without mentioning geography anything beyond hinduskush, again, vedas originated even before writing came into existence, so how can an illiterate tribe suddenly enter the region and produce such things suddenly:confused: without mentioning anything related to Persia or Caucasus montains ever:)
My request is for reading about the works of N Kazanas
the truth will be never out anyway, Harrapans supposedly destroyed by Aryans did have fire altars, Kamandal-ah, Vermillion hair parting which makes vedas, now again how aryans have incorporated them in vedas even before meeting Harrapans, is harrapans and Aryans is the same thing? is/will remain unanswered:)
South Indian never accepted hindi but were very receptive of sanskrit, so sankritized hindi was used to make an appeal though tamilians still don’t teach hindi in their schools:D
brilliant:k:
Mahabharat mentions her brother’s kingdom near the side of Hindukush that was lost because gandhari’s husband didn’t support him in the battle is also mentioned. Ranjit singh and ChandraGupta Maurya weren’t invaders they were local ruler, Maurya is backward caste now, Jats were scythian with origin in various region that decides our Gothram, mine is Gandhar gotram, eastern most, and considered the best one:), Purushpur, became peshawar, and Luvpur became lahore etc over the period of time.
Not a problem at all, bulk of primitive hindu literature is atheistic in nature, one can remain an atheist hindu as well:)