a lot of white americans are coming to this forum and blamming Muslims for all of the middle east problems, while ignoring the fact that it was the US government that was supporting saddam hussain. Us government supplied alot of material and intelligent information to saddam. Henry Kissinger said that saddam hussain was a bas.tard but he was “our’s (america’s) bas.tard”
Most of the dictators in the middle east (in Jordan, Egypt, Saudi arabia etc) are supported by the US and then it is funny to see white americans not acknowledging that their country is supporting these dictators.
If saddam Hussain was that bad then why was Rumsfeld acting like Saddam’s butt buddy ?
Re: Who was Saddam Hussain's daddy ? Uncle Sam or 'Uncle Mohammad" ?
Junior member, these Americans have been discussing America's lack of involvement in Saddam's reign of terror for years. Ad nauseum. Occasionally a new US-phobe (sometimes white-phobe or Christian-phobe) starts posting this same crap. Read the recent threads. Research the old.
And btw, this meaningless photo has been posted more times than you've posted your hatred for whites. In other words, ad nauseum.
Re: Who was Saddam Hussain's daddy ? Uncle Sam or 'Uncle Mohammad" ?
Don't discriminate, there is also black america who think same. It's not exclusively a white thing or a black thing.
.
buddy,
I don't hate whites, well at least not hot white ladies ( thats another topic for another day).
My argument is that most of the agressive foreign policy is designed by white american men and not minorities. The black american historical experience is different (slavery , persecution) and hence they are sensitive to white aggression against other people. It is a fact that black americans are far less likely to be pro-israel then white americans. It is also a fact that white americans are more likely to be anti-immigrant, anti-muslim then blacks. am I wrong ?