and whats their respective fastest deliveries? We know the first two spots but there seems be a controversy around the third place. 
both are equally good. but when it comes to 3rd fastest bowler, i think i'm better than both :D
I think its Shane Bond, he bowled in mid 90s during the WC, and Sami has gotten into that region only couple times and Bonds is a much better bowler then Sami as well, too bad we won't be seeing him against Pakistan.
Just found this:
http://www.cricket.org/link_to_database/ARCHIVE/CRICKET_NEWS/2003/MAR/155345_ICC_11MAR2003.html
So there you have it. Not only do we have the fastest bowler in the world, but we also have the third fastest. And as Sami grows up, I belive he’ll get faster still. I hope he crosses 100mph. He’ll need to work very hard for it, but let’s hope that he does. :jhanda: :jhanda: :jhanda:
sami has and can bowl at mid 90’s MPH but i think consistensy wise Bod is ahead of him.
sami can bowl consistently in the 90s....
i have seen many matches of him where he has not bowled a single delivery under 90....
and he does it with such an effortless action....
i dont think bond can reach 95+....
But Bond is a much better bowler.
Him along with Shoaib have been the only ones who can topple the Aussies.
I think Muhammed Sami…
hes not appreciated by the watchers because we have the worlds fastest bowler bowling with him… so if the first bowler is bowling at 95+ and the sami is bowling at 90-92… so ppl enjoy watchin shoaibi!
People like Shane Bond bcuz hes the fastest in his team and also his second pacers are Daryll Tuffey/Scott Styris/Kyle Mills…
Is Shane Bond playing against Pakistan:konfused:
No he is not…he is injured.