The first one who’s otherwise a morally flawless person, deceives you, tries to undercut you, and when you’re in trouble, he’s there … to screw/ditch you.
The other guy has plenty of moral flaws, i.e. he drinks, he is a druggie, a womanizer etc etc, but he’s always honest with you, never tries to undercut you, and when you’re in trouble, he’s there to help you.
Who do you think is the better friend and better human being?
Both are dangerous. Don't go for any of them. BUT if you have no other option available and you HAVE to choose one out of the two, then go for the one in whom you find the potential of a "good natured" person, who is aware of the flaws in his personality but is humbly prepared to correct himself. In short, the one with whom it is always easier for you to be on the morally right path, no matter if he takes you or you take him to it.
It all depends on a lot of factors.
CASE 1: Maybe he is not that kind of person by nature but has some grudge against you due to your past unintentional mistakes in dealing with him, may be he is taking a revenge from you but is not aware that your intentions were not to harm him. In that case it is better to try to know the reason of his negative attitude towards you and remove misunderstandings, because after all he is morally a flawless person, then how come he behaves with you in a way that is not expected out of him. The key is to find out "Is it only you or he behaves like that with most of his friends ?"
**CASE 2: **No matter how much helpful he is to you, if he is not willing to correct himself and his bad habits, better not accept his help towards you. His company can badly effect your life in a number of ways. If tomorrow he is caught in a serious case, being his friend you might also be suspected. In short, there are always chances of one "Chinghari" (spark ?) reaching your clothes if you continue to remain close to fire.
In both cases always do your own homework (precautionary measures) and be mentally prepared for the worst, so that you may not suddenly be hit by a negative surprise.
stay away from the first friend..only get help from the second firend if really necessary..plus ppl change over time..i dont think theyll alwayz stay that way..also the first freind is not morally flawaless..i wouldnt call them that..maybe u meant soemthing else..so bascally it doesnt matter who better firend or human being from both of these..
The first one who’s otherwise a morally flawless person, deceives you, tries to undercut you, and when you’re in trouble, he’s there … to screw/ditch you.?
and what about u yrself ?? what about yr morals , u must have done something which has irked him & made him react like that ?? if a person is a known flawless he would hardly do something like that out of blue .............