100% right. Well I already said that This Fitna started in era of Sayyedna Umer’s rule. Shias mostly worked in Ajamis areas because they were afraid that Arabs will not accept them and their wrong concepts.
They even dont love decendents of Prophet, their only Mission is to creat disturbence by any mean. Abusing is the easiest way, so they abused every companion, wife of Prophet.
All the Caliphs done their best in which circumstances.
Sayyedna Abu-Bakr fought against False Prophets, it was not an easy task. He also fought against Deniers of Zakkat. He compiled Quran and gave it a book form, suggested title Quran. Not an easy task too.
Sayyedna Umer established Army, established the system of pay for soldiers. Established the system of Courts and Judges. Established the System of pay of judges. And many more…captured the remote area.
Sayyedna Usman putted Dots (Nuktay) on Quran for better recite. Established Navy. Captured remote areas and many more.
Sayyedna Ali could not do much because he had less time and was busy with Trouble Makers All the time. Those trouble makers killed him after leaving Khilafat by the reason,“If Ali is the most and only right person to get Khilafat, why he left it. It was God’s will to make him Khalifa, He disobeyed Allah so He is Kafir now. And we are allowed to kill him.” How wicked were those persons. Ungh
We respect them all. And about making sects in Islam I will say,"It is Prohibited In Islam to creat sect."Need more details…here is the link to the detailed answer. http://www.paklinks.com/gs/showthread.php?t=185492
I m not resembling her . Rather it was my answer to your childish behaviour when you didnt accept facts i had provided simply by saying that “its a blame” ! I asked you whether you take the incidents and historical facts about Yazeed, Abu Leheb etc as blame also , if not then why double standards? !
And as for making your position strong, only ignorants will agree to your own conjectures or stuff fed in your mind my Naasibi mullahs. So i m not worried abt that.
We check each and ever person on the basis of her/his stance towards Ahlulbait [as], no matter how respected he/she might have been in the eyes of some people but if he/she had went against Ahllubait [as] then we are at distance with such person.
First of all it was not her duty to take avenge of Usman’s murder. Specialy not with religious aspect. Secdonly she wanted to put his cousin Talha at his place but when he heard that people have gathered around Ali [as] she clearly changed her policy.
No shia say that she was a Kafira. Being mother of muslims is does not show merits of a mother rather the merit of a mother is because she is the mother of “muslims” . If some lady is mother of a renowned doctor and it is said that she is mother of Dr. abc then its the doctor who is the base of her honour.
Secondly wives of Holy Prophet [s] were declared as mothers of muslims so that people can not marry with them after Prophet [s].
Thats latest Naasbi point in market. Ali [as] was brought up by his parents and then by Holy Prophet [s]. Her hatred towards Ali [as] was can be imagine from her behaviour that she was not ready to take his name in good context. This fact testified by Ibn Abbas [ra] can be read in many esteemed books EG
Musnad by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v6, pp 34,228
al-Tabaqat al-Kabir, by Ibn Sa’d, v2, part 2, p29
above
And your point is ?
Her being mother of belivers has been mentioned by me above.
If you are trying to suggest from these verses that ayesha was so pious that Allah [sw]r ordered Prophet [s] that he can not leave her (thats what i understood from ur stance of quoting these verses) then certainlt its incorrect while Holy Prophet [s] was given full authoirty to leave any among them he wished.
[Shakir 33:51] You may put off whom you please of them, and you may take to you whom you please, and whom you desire of those whom you had separated provisionally; no blame attaches to you; this is most proper, so that their eyes may be cool and they may not grieve, and that they should be pleased, all of them with what you give them, and Allah knows what is in your hearts; and Allah is Knowing, Forbearing.
And most importantly how can you forget these verses wherein Allah [swt] clearly condemn them.
[Shakir 33:30] O wives of the prophet! whoever of you commits an open indecency, the punishment shall be increased to her doubly; and this IS easy to Allah.
Means there was a tendency for the wives of Holy Prophet [s] to commit offensiveness and they were not guaranteed comeplete aloof life from sins. Therefore we read in Surah Tahrim:
And (remember) when the Prophet (SAW) disclosed a matter in confidence to one of his wives (Hafsah), so when she told it (to another i.e. Aishah), and Allah made it known to him, he informed part thereof and left a part. Then when he told her (Hafsah) thereof, she said: “Who told you this?” He said: “The All-Knower, the All-Aware (Allah) has told me”. (Quran 66:3)
If you two (wives of the Prophet SAW, namely Aishah and Hafsah ÑÖì ) turn in repentance to Allah, (it will be better for you), your hearts are indeed so inclined (to oppose what the Prophet SAW likes), but if you help one another against him (Muhammad SAW), then verily, Allah is his Maula (Lord, or Master, or Protector, etc.), and Jibrael (Gabriel), and the righteous among the believers, and furthermore, the angels are his helpers. (Quran 66:4)
Most importantly:
It may be if he divorced you (all) that his Lord will give him instead of you, wives better than you, Muslims (who submit to Allah), believers, obedient to Allah, turning to Allah in repentance, worshipping Allah sincerely, fasting or emigrants (for Allahs sake), previously married and virgins. (Quran 66:5)
…well written also:blush: