Who are the Pakhtuns?

It is an old controversy, I wonder why doesn’t just hold a DNA test and settle the issue.

By Rahimullah Yusufzai

The unending debate on the origins of the Pakhtuns is still as inconclusive and divisive as ever. The issue crops up at literary and political gatherings and is even discussed by village folks in their hujras. In fact, it is a fascinating topic with everyone from the layman to the scholar having a definite viewpoint as to the beginnings of this enigmatic and much misunderstood race.

The issue was debated once more but never concluded at the launch of Brigadier (retd) Haroon Rashid’s book, ‘History of the Pathans, Vol 1, The Sarabani Pathans’, in Peshawar some time back. As usual, there were advocates of theories ranging from Pakhtuns having an Aryan, Jewish, Arab or mixed origin. None was convincing enough to carry the day. Disagreement was in the air the moment commentators started analysing the voluminous book. Notoriously known for their disunity, the Pakhtuns have been unable even to agree on their origins.

NWFP Governor, Lt Gen (retd) Syed Iftikhar Hussain Shah summed up the proceedings when he noted that the origin of the Pakhtuns was shrouded in mystery. Referring to the different theories in vogue, he reminded the people that author Naimatullah Harawi considered the Pakhtuns to be of Jewish extraction, the British felt they had a mixed origin while Pakhtun writers thought their race was Aryan. He opined that DNA tests could help solve the riddle. Earlier, physician Dr Sher Mohammad Khan had also advocated DNA tests to establish the truth.

Scholars having failed to agree on the Pakhtun origins, it is certainly time to request scientists to do the job. It is possible that some people may not even accept the DNA findings if their own theories are demolished as a consequence. However, most Pakhtuns would accept the DNA tests if their origins were conclusively established. Knowing a definite answer rather than subscribing to widely different theories would certainly be more appealing. This would also bring to an end the twisting and fascinating debate on the Pakhtun roots.

It may not matter much to other races as to how and where did they first originate, but it matters to the Pakhtuns, who are obsessed with their glorious past and extremely proud of their code of honour and way of life. Many Pakhtuns believe they have inherited their chivalry and courage from the great Muslim general Khalid bin Walid, who earned the title Saifullah (‘Sword of Allah’) from Holy Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him) on account of his exceptional bravery. They would be glad if it was established that they were somehow related to Khalid bin Walid through their putative ancestor Qais Abdur Rashid. This would also strengthen the theory that the Pakhtuns are of Arab descent.

The theory about the Aryan roots of the Pakhtuns is also popular. In particular, the Pakhtuns in Afghanistan advanced this argument and named a number of their institutions including the national airline as Aryana. The rise of Adolf Hitler’s Germany also prompted many Afghan scholars to link the Afghans to the Aryans. Hitler’s fall surely dampened most Afghans but the Aryan theory refused to go away.

The Jewish theory has been around for ages. Each and every Pakhtun is opposed to the Israeli occupation of Palestine, more so of Bait al-Maqdas, the third holiest Islamic city after Makkah and Madina. As such, most Pakhtuns don’t like the Jewish connection. They are shy of conceding that their ancestors could be Jews. But there is no way to delete one’s past from history. So it pops up again, gaining currency or losing relevance depending on the circumstances. However, some Pakhtuns don’t mind being bracketed with the Jews. They would like to believe that the Pakhtuns are the lost tribe of the Jews, a theory that has found many supporters, including noted scholars in Israel and some Western countries. In fact, a small number of Pakhtuns drew satisfaction from the fact that the Jewish state of Israel had time and again proved its military superiority over a host of Arab countries in its neighbourhood. For them it is affirmation of their own bravery as well as glorious past.

A strong case could be made for making use of the research done by Jewish scholars worldwide to trace the lost 13th tribe of the Jews because it could throw light on the origin of the Pakhtuns. There should be no harm in undertaking collaborative studies between Pakhtun and Jewish scholars to find out the truth. A Canadian film crew made a documentary some time ago on the similarities between Jews and Pakhtuns and filmed glimpses of the Pakhtun culture that resembled the Jewish way of life. The team also interviewed Pakhtun scholars in the NWFP and Afghan writers in Afghanistan as part of its project concerning the theory that Pakhtuns could be the lost tribe of the Jews.

Imagination can fly wild while discussing different theories concerning the origins of the Pakhtuns. British authors, mostly military men who served in the Pakhtun areas during the colonial period, reported these theories and added to the confusion. Some of them, such as Sir Winston Churchill, made slanderous and derogatory remarks against the Pakhtuns. Their ire was understandable because Pakhtun warriors resisted British rule and inflicted great losses on the imperial army. Other British writers reluctantly conceded the courage and chivalry of the Pakhtuns and described them as their most formidable foes. Books by Pakhtun writers Roshan Khan, Bahadur Shah Zafar, Qazi Attaullah and Pareshan Khattak about their own race also suffer from deficiencies. A definitive account of the Pakhtuns is yet to be written. Until then, we would have to live with the mystery of the Pakhtun origin.

link

Hmm...

Interesting article. I guess the bottom line here is that Pakhtuns are either of Aryan or Semetic (Arab or Jewish) background. I do agree that DNA testing will certainly clear up the confusion as well as tying the tribes together.

One question though, if the Ghilzais and Durranis are the two 'super' tribes, does that mean every Pakhtun subtribe (Afridis, Shinwaris etc) are part of either one of the tribes?

^ No RF, they all claim direct descent from Qais and his children. Qais was a Sahaba of Prophet Muhammad (sm.)

Durranis and Ghilzais (original pronounciation ghal-zway just ask a pashtun what that translates as;), are the largest Pashtun tribes and have their own sub tribes.

I see. Interesting information on Ghal-zway, I asked my wife regarding the term and it doesn’t seem too flattering :hehe: Was it “bestowed” by the Durranis? Perhaps because they saw Ghilzai’s “usurpers” in some ways?

My apologies for the trouble but I need to know a few things as my in laws and friends seem to be biased in one way or the other.

  • Are there any Popalzai’s in Pakistan? I don’t mean as refugees, but rather as a known tribe?
  • Why is it that most of Shia Pakhtuns (rare) come from Qandahar? Mostly Pakhtuns are Sunni Hanafi.
  • On my last visit to Pakistan, I had the privilage of traveling to NWFP particularly to Malakand Agency…We met a tribe called the “Ranizais.” They were extremely hospitable, so I did not want to ask this question: Since “zai” indicates Son of..them being called Ranizais was odd. What I found even odder was that they were more “south asian” rather than central asian in their customs and appearence, although they did follow Pashtunwali. My wife and her cousins also picked up on that as well. Do you have any information in regards to the Ranizai?

I am a YusufZai and I think our ancestors were Jews.

Very Interesting thread…:k:

I see. Interesting information on Ghal-zway, I asked my wife regarding the term and it doesn’t seem too flattering Was it “bestowed” by the Durranis? Perhaps because they saw Ghilzai’s “usurpers” in some ways?

I figured you’d get a translation, :wink: , Pashtun tribe names usually have a story attached to them, some simply naming them after the name of man which the family line followed from, others are more colourful, for example Orakzai= wruk Zway. I’ve always wanted to find out more but there is not much literature available on them sadly. I can’t answer all your questions, but I’ll answer what i can.

Why is it that most of Shia Pakhtuns (rare) come from Qandahar?

That’s news to me, the shia pashtuns I know of are mostly from Parachinar, in case of Afghanistan they are mostly Persian speakers or Hazara Afghanis who speak pashto. I’ll ask around though.

Do you have any information in regards to the Ranizai?

Hmm, I’ve heard the name, but i am afraid I don’t know much about them. In case of Swat Tribes, I’d recommend you look up two books, The Last Wali of Swat and some excerpts of the other is available at this link: http://www.bu.edu/anthrop/faculty/lindholm/SocialStructure.html

I think Akbar Ahmad also wrote a book on the Swat/Malakand Pashtuns.

There is another link which has information on the shajara’s (family tree’s ) of almost all Pashtun tribes, despite the politics of the site, it stands out as being the only site to have scanned the information on pashtun tribes in, the catch is you need to be able to read pashto, although you shouldn’t have a problem.

**
I figured you’d get a translation, :wink: , Pashtun tribe names usually have a story attached to them, some simply naming them after the name of man which the family line followed from, others are more colourful, for example Orakzai= wruk Zway. I’ve always wanted to find out more but there is not much literature available on them sadly. I can’t answer all your questions, but I’ll answer what i can.
**

Salaam Zakk :slight_smile:
Interesting..I am sure there are people who know about these legends. I am certainly enlightened by the information.
**
That’s news to me, the shia pashtuns I know of are mostly from Parachinar, in case of Afghanistan they are mostly Persian speakers or Hazara Afghanis who speak pashto. I’ll ask around though.
**

Well I speak of the Shia Pashtuns in terms of knowing 6 different families (not related) from Qandahar. Also they talked about atleast 3 different Imam Bargahs, so that really sparked my curiosity.

**
Hmm, I’ve heard the name, but i am afraid I don’t know much about them. In case of Swat Tribes, I’d recommend you look up two books, The Last Wali of Swat and some excerpts of the other is available at this link: http://www.bu.edu/anthrop/faculty/lindholm/SocialStructure.html

I think Akbar Ahmad also wrote a book on the Swat/Malakand Pashtuns.

There is another link which has information on the shajara’s (family tree’s ) of almost all Pashtun tribes, despite the politics of the site, it stands out as being the only site to have scanned the information on pashtun tribes in, the catch is you need to be able to read pashto, although you shouldn’t have a problem. **

Thank so much for the information. Well Swat does have genetically non-Pakhtun tribes/peoples…my encounter with the Ranizai’s gave me the impression that their customs, culture may have been modified to a more Pakhtun mold because they are distinct.

I’ll definately look up A. Ahmad’s book, as the literature that I have read related to Malakand is British in nature and it presents the tribes in a highly crude and derogatory manner. Furthermore their methods of data collection and understanding of the region is highly suspect.

Since we are sharing information, I just wanted to let you know that my Alma Mater NYU has taken up a rather ambitious project on digitizing Afghanistan’s literature. The project has been slow moving but Ins’Allah there will be more than enough resources available online once it is completed. The link is: Afghanistan Digital Library

I appreciate your help, I asked the questions with the understanding that they my be unanswerable in the foreseable future.

Yeah...the lost tribe theory is the most reliable......because of the facts and similarities b/w jews and pakhtuns. The solid proof is still requried since its been over 3000 years now. DNA is the best way for determination.