Who are the Ahlel Bayt?

The Ahlel Bayt refers to the Prophet’s family. Yes, it is true that the Prophet’s family are of an exalted status. However, the Shia opinion of who is Ahlel Bayt is discriminatory and ethically wrong. The rightly guided Ahlus Sunnah holds that the Ahlel Bayt does indeed refer to the Prophet’s family, but that the Prophet’s family includes all pious Muslims; the reason for this is that relations are based on Taqwa (piety) in the Islamic belief, not on blood. It was based on this fact that the Prophet referred to Salman al-Farsi as being Ahlel Bayt, even though Salman was Persian in ethnicity and completely unrelated to the Prophet by blood.
Anyone who is pious is part of the Ahlel Bayt; some of these people were specifically mentioned to be part of this group. These include:

  1. The Prophet’s wives
  2. The Prophet’s children
  3. The Prophet’s freed slaves
  4. Ahlel Kisa (People of the Cloak, i.e. Ali ibn Abi Talib’s family)
  5. The family of Aqil
  6. The offspring of Jafar
  7. The offspring of Abbas
  8. Salman al-Farsi
    And perhaps some others we may have missed…
    However, the Ahlel Bayt is not limited to these people. Included in the Ahlel Bayt is every God-fearing believer. The Prophet said:
    “Do not come to me with your lineages on the Day of Resurrection! My Family is every God-fearing believer.”
    and
    “Every Prophet has a Family and carriage; my Family and carriage are the Believers.”
    An appropriate analogy is the fact that the Prophet named ten Sahabah specifically by name as being promised Paradise, but this does not mean that they are the only ones to go to Paradise. Likewise, the Prophet specifically referred to certain people as being family, but this does not mean that others are not also part of it.
    Islam does not support bigotry, discrimination, or racism. Instead, Islam is egalitarian and just.

Grand Ayatollah al-Kho’i, the former leader of the Hawzah of the holy city of Najaf, wrote in his book “Sirat al-Najat” that the wife is a part of a man’s “Ahl”. It should be noted that “Sirat al-Najat” is a very famous book which is referenced on Al-Islam.org many times. Is it not clear from this that the Prophet’s wives are a part of his “Ahl”?
Does this not expose the hypocrisy of the Shia leaders when they include their own wives in their Ahl, but they then rip the Prophet’s wives out of *his *Ahl? This is indeed indicative of the two-faced attitude of the Shia Ayatollahs, whereby they will never tolerate a man insulting their own wives, but they themselves will degrade the Prophet’s wives! Aisha and Hafsa are a part of the Ahlel Bayt, and the Shia leaders lie when they claim to be the lovers of Ahlel Bayt when in fact they are the enemies and revilers of the Prophet’s wives (i.e. his Ahlel Bayt). We kindly ask the Shia laypersons to disassociate themselves from their leaders and to instead embrace the true lovers of Ahlel Bayt, i.e. the Ahlus Sunnah.

http://www.ahlelbayt.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/khoi1.jpg

http://www.ahlelbayt.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/khoi2.jpg

Q: There is a command to convey the Haqq (Truth) to one’s “Ahl” as well as to forbid them from the evil things, so in this command, who is “Ahl”? And is one’s wife included in this, and is this command (to convey the truth) applicable to one’s wife?
**Answer by al-Ko’i: **Yes, the wife is part of the “Ahl”, and this command is in regards to her too. And Allah knows best.
(source: Sirat al-Najat, by Grand Ayatollah al-Kho’i, p.426

Please provide the reference of the two ahadith that you have quoted. Nobody will take your word on it.

Secondly, you have listed a lot of people as ahl-e-bayt, on what grounds?

The people of the house of Mohammad (SAW) are only Ali, Fatimah, Hassan and Hussain.

This is called Ayat-e-Mubahila and it is proof enough who are the people of the house or ahl-e-bayt. Prophet (SAW) took the people of Kisa only to this gathering and none of his wives.

  • 003.061 * YUSUFALI: If any one disputes in this matter with thee, now after (full) knowledge Hath come to thee, say: "Come! let us gather together,- our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves: Then let us earnestly pray, and invoke the curse of Allah on those who lie!"

this topic belongs to ahlul bait, not ahlul muhabila, start new therad will answer there.


*producing below ayah-e-thateer, allah says to mothers of ummah that you are not like other women since you have very special position. *

“O wives of the Prophet! You are not like any other of the women; If you will be on your guard, then be not soft in your speech, lest he in whose heart is a disease yearn; and speak a good word. And stay quietly in your houses, and make not a dazzling display, like that of the former Times of Ignorance; and establish regular Prayer, and give regular Charity; and obey Allah and His Messenger. And Allah only wishes to remove all abomination from you, you Ahlel Bayt (People of the House), and to make you pure and spotless. And recite what is rehearsed to you in your homes, of the Signs of Allah and His Wisdom: for Allah understands the finest mysteries and is well-acquainted (with them).” (Quran, 33:32-34)
Allah Almighty clearly addresses the wives of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم). If we were to argue that this verse is the verse of purification and that it makes certain people infallible, then we would have to conclude that it is Aisha (رضّى الله عنها) and the rest of the Prophet’s wives which were made infallible. We base this on the simple fact that the verse was revealed with the heading “O wives of the Prophet.” how can we say that this verse refers to Ali (رضّى الله عنه) and the so called Infallible Imams when none of them are mentioned here, but only the wives are addressed? We understand that it is a popular concept that this verse makes the Ahlel Bayt infallible. However, it is also the same people who spread such conceptions who believe that Aisha (رضّى الله عنها) hated Ali (رضّى الله عنه). It seems to us that, if anything, it is Aisha (رضّى الله عنها) who is made infallible, and if indeed that is the case shouldn’t the Shia side with her over Ali (رضّى الله عنه)?
There is actually not a single verse in the Quran which identifies Ali (رضّى الله عنه), Fatima (رضّى الله عنها), Hasan (رضّى الله عنه), or Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) to be Ahlel Bayt. Not a single verse in the Quran mentions the so called 12 Infallible Imams of the Shia religion, let alone mentioning them as the Ahlel Bayt. Nowhere in the Quran does it refer to the Hidden Imam as the Ahlel Bayt. How is it then that a very fundamental aspect of the Shia faith is not in the Quran, which is supposed to be the ultimate guide to truth? How can the ultimate guide be devoid of the essence of belief, as the Shia claim that following their Ahlel Bayt is? The term Ahlel Bayt has been used twice in the Quran, and both times to refer to the wives. The Quran does not say “O cousin of the Prophet” but rather it says “O wives of the Prophet.”
In conclusion, the verse you have mentioned, Verse 33:33, was addressed to the Prophet’s wives.

like a week ago u were arguing that ahley bait is only used for females of family? did u change ur mind ? or did u forget to read what u posted ?

Again my frnd u dont have problem with who says what .... As long as a shia says it its wrong.... However if someone in ur salafi sites says the same thing u wud agree..
**
Again my point is .... a week ago u were claiming that ahle-bait r only women, so tell me, were u wrong earlier or are u wrong now ? or u cant be wrong coz u r salafi ? do not take the conversation anywhere else. **

are you really that thick?

what is ahlull mubahila?

If the wives were part of the ahlul bayt then why didnt the prophet (SAW) take the wives (or any one of them) with him.

"......our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves....."

[quote]

*producing below ayah-e-thateer, allah says to mothers of ummah that you are not like other women since you have very special position. *

“O wives of the Prophet! You are not like any other of the women; If you will be on your guard, then be not soft in your speech, lest he in whose heart is a disease yearn; and speak a good word. And stay quietly in your houses, and make not a dazzling display, like that of the former Times of Ignorance; and establish regular Prayer, and give regular Charity; and obey Allah and His Messenger. And Allah only wishes to remove all abomination from you, you Ahlel Bayt (People of the House), and to make you pure and spotless. And recite what is rehearsed to you in your homes, of the Signs of Allah and His Wisdom: for Allah understands the finest mysteries and is well-acquainted (with them).” (Quran, 33:32-34)
Allah Almighty clearly addresses the wives of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم). If we were to argue that this verse is the verse of purification and that it makes certain people infallible, then we would have to conclude that it is Aisha (رضّى الله عنها) and the rest of the Prophet’s wives which were made infallible. We base this on the simple fact that the verse was revealed with the heading “O wives of the Prophet.” how can we say that this verse refers to Ali (رضّى الله عنه) and the so called Infallible Imams when none of them are mentioned here, but only the wives are addressed? We understand that it is a popular concept that this verse makes the Ahlel Bayt infallible. However, it is also the same people who spread such conceptions who believe that Aisha (رضّى الله عنها) hated Ali (رضّى الله عنه). It seems to us that, if anything, it is Aisha (رضّى الله عنها) who is made infallible, and if indeed that is the case shouldn’t the Shia side with her over Ali (رضّى الله عنه)?
There is actually not a single verse in the Quran which identifies Ali (رضّى الله عنه), Fatima (رضّى الله عنها), Hasan (رضّى الله عنه), or Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) to be Ahlel Bayt. Not a single verse in the Quran mentions the so called 12 Infallible Imams of the Shia religion, let alone mentioning them as the Ahlel Bayt. Nowhere in the Quran does it refer to the Hidden Imam as the Ahlel Bayt. How is it then that a very fundamental aspect of the Shia faith is not in the Quran, which is supposed to be the ultimate guide to truth? How can the ultimate guide be devoid of the essence of belief, as the Shia claim that following their Ahlel Bayt is? The term Ahlel Bayt has been used twice in the Quran, and both times to refer to the wives. The Quran does not say “O cousin of the Prophet” but rather it says “O wives of the Prophet.”
In conclusion, the verse you have mentioned, Verse 33:33, was addressed to the Prophet’s wives.
[/quote]

if the last sentence of the verse was addressed to the wives then how come Aisha narrated this hadith about the pure souls and forgot to mention herself.

Sahih Muslim

ook 031, Number 5955: * 'A'isha reported that Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) went out one norning wearing a striped cloak of the black camel's hair that there came **Hasan* b. 'Ali. He wrapped hitn under it, then came Husain and he wrapped him under it along with the other one (Hasan). Then came Fatima and he took her under it, then came 'Ali and he also took him under it and then said:** Allah only desires to take away any uncleanliness from you, O people of the household, and purify you **(thorough purifying)

The term “Medinatul-Nabi” translates to “the City of the Prophet.” This was eventually shortened to “Medinah” which although it translates technically to simply “city,” it is referring to the City of the Prophet (i.e. formerly Yathrib, and now the second most holy city of the Muslims).

The term “Ahle Bayt Muhammad” translates to “People of the House of Muhammad.” This phrase was also shortened to simply “Ahlel Bayt” but it is implicit that this refers to the House of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) and nobody else. It translates to “people of *the *house” with emphasis on “the” to denote the respect given to the Prophetic household.
Both the Ahlus Sunnah and the Shia believe it is important to love the Ahlel Bayt. Now, the question is: who are the Ahle Bayt Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم)? The answer to this question is quite simply that first and foremost the Prophet’s wives are Ahlel Bayt. The Prophet’s wives have the most right to be referred to as Ahlel Bayt, over and above all other individuals.
Dictionary Definition of “Ahlel Bayt”
Let us first define the words “Ahlel Bayt.” To establish absolute objectivity, we will not define it ourselves, but rather we will quote straight from the most popular Shia website, Al-Islam.org (emphasis is ours):
Al-Islam.org says
“The term “ahl” signifies the members of a household of a man, including his fellow tribesmen, kin, relatives, wife (or wives), children, and all those who share a family background, religion, housing, city, and country with him…“Bayt” refers to habitation and dwelling, including tents and buildings both. The “ahl-al-bayt” of any person refers to his family members
and all those who live in his house.

[RIGHT]source: http://al-islam.org/mot/default.asp?url=14ahlbayt.htm” [/RIGHT]

We encourage our readers to verify this defintion by picking up any Arabic dictionary. There are three words to look up: Ahl, Bayt, and Ahl-Al-Bayt. Let us reproduce what one such Arabic dictionary has to say, although the results will no doubt be virtually identical in any other dictionary.
Ahl: noun; relatives including wives, children, brothers, sisters, and other kinsmen, and sometimes used to refer to fellow tribesmen
**Bayt: **noun; house; place of residence
Ahl-Al-Bayt: noun; those people in relation to a man who live in his house, especially his wives and unmarried children that live under his roof and are provided for by him
In fact, the primary definition of Ahl Bayt is a man’s wives; in Arab culture, it is considered rude to call a man’s wives by their actual names, and hence people will refer to a man’s wives simply as his “Ahl Bayt”.
The Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah
The Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama’ah thus take the wives of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) to be the Ahlel Bayt. This is in accordance with the dictionary definition of the word as shown above. The Prophet’s wives are part of the Prophet’s Ahl, and they live in his Bayt. Therefore, Aisha (رضّى الله عنها) and Hafsa (رضّى الله عنها) are included in the Ahlel Bayt.
The Shia
The Shia Ayatollahs do not have a positive viewpoint of the Prophet’s wives. In fact, the Shia Ayatollahs possess “baraa” (hatred) for Aisha (رضّى الله عنها) and Hafsa (رضّى الله عنها), and we shall examine this in later articles. It is because of this reason that the Shia Ayatollahs deny that the Prophet’s wives are Ahlel Bayt. In fact, many of our Shia brothers who do not speak Arabic are even unaware of the actual definition and usage of the term “Ahlel Bayt” since they simply listen to their Ayatollahs.
The Shia Ayatollahs say that only four people are part of the Ahle Bayt Muhammad, namely Ali (رضّى الله عنه), Fatima (رضّى الله عنها), Hasan (رضّى الله عنه), and Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). We would like to question the basis upon which they make this claim. This is not the Ahlel Bayt of Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم), but rather this is the Ahlel Bayt of Ali (رضّى الله عنه). These were the four individuals who lived under the roof of Ali (رضّى الله عنه), not the roof of Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم). It is agreed upon by both the Ahlus Sunnah and the Shia that Ali (رضّى الله عنه) did not live in the Bayt of Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) but rather had his own place of residence, in which Fatima (رضّى الله عنها), Hasan (رضّى الله عنه), and Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) also lived.
The Shia also include their Infallible Imams in the Ahlel Bayt. We wonder on what basis they do this as well, since none of these individuals (other than Ali رضّى الله عنه], Hasan رضّى الله عنه], and Hussain رضّى الله عنه]) lived in the time of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم), let alone in the Bayt of Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم).
Common Usage of the Term “Ahl-Al-Bayt”
The Quran is an Arabic book that has been revealed to people whose language was Arabic. We will misinterpret the Quran if we attempt to understand its words in a way that was not (and could not be) understood by the primary addressees of the book. Today, if we ask an Arab friend to come to our house with his Ahl-Al-Bayt, the default is that he will come to our house with his wife and children who are staying in his house. He might bring his married children or he might not. He might even bring a friend if the friend is a permanent resident of his house. But primarily, an Arab will understand from this that he should bring his wives, since this is the central and primary definition of the phrase “Ahl-Al-Bayt”.
An Arab will be extremely shocked if he finds that by Ahl-Al-Bayt we meant his cousin, married children, and grandchildren, all of whom live in another house. He will be extremely shocked that we do not mean his wife who lives in his Bayt. This is because for any Arab, the word Ahl-Al-Bayt (which literally means those staying in the house) includes the wife (or wives) of a person. This was in no way any different at the time of the Prophet. It is the same in all Arab countries. It is interesting that even in Iran (being a Shia dominated country) people use the word Ahl-Al-Bayt to refer to the wife as well as children of a person. If we look at any popular book of Arabic words we will find that in the definition of Ahlel Bayt, wife is included. We would thus like to ask the Shia Ayatollahs why they proclaim a different definition of the word Ahlel Bayt? Why should it be that the Prophet’s wives are not part of Ahlel Bayt but rather the Infallible Imams are? In our opinion, this defies logic.
Logic and Common Sense
Ahlel Bayt means the family of a man living in his house. If we were to ask any Shia who is a part of his own family, he would most definitely include his mother (or his spouse) in his response. Mothers and wives are the basic foundation of a family. If we were to ask an unbiased third party as to who the family of Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) was, the first names they would mention would be the Prophet’s wives.
The Quran Refers to the Prophet’s Wives as Ahlel Bayt
As Muslims, we believe in the absolute authority of the Quran. It is the highest source of legislation; in fact, it is the very speech of Allah. The Quran refers to the Prophet’s wives as the Ahlel Bayt. Allah Almighty Himself negates all those who dare argue that Aisha (رضّى الله عنها) and Hafsa (رضّى الله عنها) are not part of the Ahlel Bayt.
The Quran specifically refers to the wives of the Prophet as Ahlel Bayt in the following verse:
“O wives of the Prophet! You are not like any other of the women; If you will be on your guard, then be not soft in your speech, lest he in whose heart is a disease yearn; and speak a good word. And stay quietly in your houses, and make not a dazzling display, like that of the former Times of Ignorance; and establish regular Prayer, and give regular Charity; and obey Allah and His Messenger. And Allah only wishes to remove all abomination from you, **you Ahlel Bayt (People of the House), **and to make you pure and spotless.” (Quran, 33:32-33)
The transliteration reads:
“Ya nisa al-nabiyi lastuna kahadin mina alnisa-i ini itaqaytuna fala takhdaAAna bialqawli fayatmaAAa allathee fee qalbihi maradun waqulna qawlan maAAroofan Waqarna fee buyootikunna wala tabarrajna tabarruja aljahiliyyati al-oola waaqimna alssalata waateena alzzakata waatiAAna Allaha warasoolahu innama yureedu Allahu liyuthhiba AAankumu alrrijsa Ahlul Bayt-i wayutahhirakum tatheeran” (Quran, 33:32-33)
There is in fact not a single verse in the Quran which identifies Ali (رضّى الله عنه), Fatima (رضّى الله عنها), Hasan (رضّى الله عنه), or Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) as the Ahlel Bayt. Not a single verse in the Quran mentions the 12 Infallible Imams of the Shia, let alone calling them Ahlel Bayt. The term “Ahlel Bayt” has been used twice in the Quran, and both times it is used to refer to the wives. And a similar term, Ahli Baytin is used in the Quran to refer to the wife of Imran (mother of Moses). And yet, not a single time is the word “Ahlel Bayt” used in the Quran for Ali (رضّى الله عنه), Fatima (رضّى الله عنها), Hasan (رضّى الله عنه), or Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). Nowhere does the Quran say “O cousin of the Prophet” but rather the Quran says “O wives of the Prophet.” If following the Ahlel Bayt is the fundamental of belief as the Shia Ayatollahs claim, then why is it that the Quran never once mentions Ali (رضّى الله عنه) let alone mentioning him as the Ahlel Bayt? If we ask our Shia brothers to produce verses in the Quran about the Ahlel Bayt, they will be dissapointed to find that these verses are all in relation to the Prophet’s wives.
Second Time the Quran Uses the Word “Ahlel Bayt”
Ahlel Bayt is used another time in the Quran and again this time to refer to the wives:
She said: ‘O wonder! shall I bear a son when I am an extremely old woman and this my husband an extremely old man? Most surely this is a wonderful thing.’ They said: ‘Do you wonder at Allah’s decree? The grace of Allah and His blessings on you, o you Ahlel Bayt (People of the House)! for He is indeed worthy of all praise, full of all glory!’” (Quran, 11:72-73)
The transliteration reads:
“Qalat Ya Waylata ‘A’alidu Wa ‘Ana Ajuzun Wa Hadha Bali Shaykhaan ‘Inna Hadha Lashay’un Ajibun. Qalu ‘Atajabina Min ‘Amri Allahi Rahmatu Allahi Wa Barakatuhu `Alaykum ‘Ahlul-Bayt-i ‘Innahu Hamidun Majidun.” (Quran, 11:72-73)
In the verse above, Prophet Ibrahim’s wife asks the angels how can she have a son, and they respond back calling her and Prophet Ibrahim (عليه السلام) as Ahlel Bayt. And again, the collective pronoun is used to refer to the Prophet Ibrahim (عليه السلام) and his wife. Nobody else was in the room other than them, and the angels referred to them all as Ahlel Bayt, including Prophet Ibrahim’s wife.
The Quran declares that Wives are Part of the Family
Allah Almighty says that all of the members of Prophet Loot’s family will be saved aside from his wife. Allah says: “(All) except the family of Loot. Them all surely We are going to save (from destruction). Except his wife…” (Quran, 15:59-60)
The construction “except his wife” would be non-sensical unless the wife was included in the family of Loot (عليه السلم). Otherwise, why would Allah need to clarify that Loot’s wife was an exception to the rule that the family of Loot (عليه السلام) would be saved?
Hadith
In Sahih Bukhari, the Prophet specifically refers to Aisha as part of Ahlel Bayt:
Sahih Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60, Number 316
Narrated Anas:
A banquet of bread and meat was held on the occasion of the marriage of the Prophet to Zainab bint Jahsh. I was sent to invite the people (to the banquet), and so the people started coming (in groups). They would eat and then leave. Another batch would come, eat and leave. So I kept on inviting the people till I found nobody to invite.
Then I said, “O Allah’s Prophet! I do not find anybody to invite.”
He (the Prophet) said, “Carry away the remaining food.” Then a batch of three persons stayed in the house chatting. The Prophet left and went towards the dwelling place of Aisha and said, “Peace and Allah’s Mercy be on you, Ya Ahlel Bayt (O the people of the house)!”
She replied, “Peace and the mercy of Allah be on you too. How did you find your wife? May Allah bless you.”
Then he went to the dwelling places of all his other wives and said to them the same as he said to Aisha and they said to him the same as Aisha had said to him.
Sahih Bukhari is considered the most reliable book of Hadith, and therefore there is no doubt that this is an authoratative declaration that the Prophet’s wives are Ahlel Bayt.
Certain Shia Ayatollahs will often take Hadith out of context in order to “prove” that the Prophet’s wives are not part of the Ahlel Bayt. We shall examine all of these Hadith in later articles, and we shall see that the reality is that an unbiased view of the Hadith merely confirms the Quran, namely that the Prophet’s wives are part of the Ahlel Bayt.
It is narrated in Sahih Muslim by Zayd ibn Arqam (رضّى الله عنه) that the Prophet’s wives are part of the Ahlel Bayt. In Sahih Muslim (Book 31, Chapter 4, Hadith-5920), Zayd says “His wives are among the people of his household.” He further emphasized: “His spouses are a fiber of his household.” If the wives are the fiber of Ahlel Bayt, it means that they are the fundamental unit of it.
In future articles, we shall–Insha-Allah–examine other Hadith, those that are commonly taken out of context by the Shia Ayatollahs.
Scholarly Opinion
Shaikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid says: “With regard to the wives of the Prophet…they are included among the members of the family of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم).” This is the majority opinion of the Ulema.
One Last Argument
We ask our Shia brothers to ponder upon why the Quran and the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) used the term “Ahl-al-Bayt” as opposed to simply “Ahl” which means “family.” By confining the Ahl with “Al-Bayt” this is restricting who is being referred to as the family living under the roof of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم). Neither Ali (رضّى الله عنه), Fatima (رضّى الله عنها), Hasan (رضّى الله عنه), nor Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) lived in the same house as the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم). On the other hand, the Prophet’s wives most definitely did.
If Allah was referring to the family of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) that did not live in his house, then surely the word “Ahl” would have been more appropriate to use; the additional specification of “Al-Bayt” would then be completely extraneous and in fact self-contradictory. The phrase “Ahl-Al-Bayt” confines the Ahl to those who live inside the Bayt, which consists of the Prophet’s wives. Any other explanation is nonsensical.
Ahlel Bayt of Ali (رضّى الله عنه)
The Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah holds the Ahle Bayt Ali (رضّى الله عنه) in the highest regard. In fact, we believe that Ali’s family (رضّى الله عنه)–along with the families of Aqeel (رضّى الله عنه) and Abbas (رضّى الله عنه)–are honorary members of the Prophetic Ahlel Bayt. Ali’s family (رضّى الله عنه) is commonly referred to as Ahlel Kisa (People of the Cloak) and they are highly regarded by the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah. However, we disagree with those who exploit the Ahlel Bayt of Ali (رضّى الله عنه) to hurt and degrade the Ahlel Bayt of Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم). We ask Allah to shower His Infinite Blessings upon both of these families.
Certain Shia propagandists might try to claim that we are insulting the family of Ali (رضّى الله عنه) by saying that they are “only” honorary members of the Ahlel Bayt, but this is not true at all. The Shia declare that Salman Al-Farsi (رضّى الله عنه) was an honorary member of Ahlel Bayt. Is this insulting Salman Al-Farsi (رضّى الله عنه)? No, it is in fact exalting him. Likewise, to say that Ali’s family (رضّى الله عنه) is an honorary part of the Ahlel Bayt is likewise an exaltation and not an insult at all. The Shia have called Salman Al-Farsi (رضّى الله عنه) to be an honorary member of the Ahlel Bayt; therefore, if they accuse the Sunnis of hating Ali (رضّى الله عنه) for calling him an honorary member, then they are also guilty of hating Salman Al-Farsi (رضّى الله عنه).
**Al-Islam.org **says
“The reference to Salman Farsi as a member of the Ahlul-Bayt is honorary. Salman Farsi’s conversion to Islam left a great impression on the HolyProphet (S) and others. Throughout the years of the Holy Prophet’s mission, Salman Farsi was one of the companions most dedicated in the service, defence and propagation of Islam. His service to the household of the HolyProphet and his sincere love for them earned him great respect from all quarters of the Ahlul-Bayt. Thus, as an honor for him, the Prophet (S) referred to him as one of the Ahlul-Bayt (AS). We pray that he will be raised in the honorable company of the ones he loved so dearly.
[RIGHT]source: http://al-islam .org/organizations/aalimnetwork/msg00450.html ” [/RIGHT]

Perhaps the reason that the Shia Ayatollahs love the Ahlel Bayt of Ali (رضّى الله عنه) and not the Ahlel Bayt of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) has to do with how the faith of Shi’ism came into being. Indeed, the early ancestors of the Shia are the Saba’ites, followers of Abdullah Ibn Saba. These Saba’ites excessively praised Ali (رضّى الله عنه) and eventually even declared that Ali (رضّى الله عنه) was superior to the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم). Today, the Shia adamantly deny this and they say that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) is superior to Ali (رضّى الله عنه). However, we wonder why then they praise the Ahlel Bayt of Ali (رضّى الله عنه) and not the Ahlel Bayt of Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم)? Is this not a remnant of the Saba’ite origin of Shi’ism?
Furthermore, there is absolutely no logic in calling the Infallible Imams of the Shia to be part of Ahlel Bayt and then deny that the Prophet’s wives are part of Ahlel Bayt. Surely, the Prophet’s wives have a much greater right to be part of Ahlel Bayt than people who did not even live in the Bayt of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم).
Conclusion
The Prophet’s wives are the Ahlel Bayt. Many Shia Ayatollahs slander Aisha (رضّى الله عنها) and Hafsa (رضّى الله عنها) with many baseless accusations (we shall examine these accusations in later articles). We ask our Shia brothers to ponder over the true nature of this love. The Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah are lovers of Ahlel Bayt and certainly not Nasibis (haters of Ahlel Bayt). In fact the reality may be that the Ayatollahs are the ones who are Nasibis as they hate the Ahlel Bayt (i.e. Prophet’s wives) so much that they even deny that they are the Ahlel Bayt! In fact, the AhlelBayt.com website was primarily designed to defend the Ahlel Bayt, namely Aisha (رضّى الله عنها), from the slander uttered against her.
The fact that the Prophet’s wives are Ahlel Bayt is proven from the Quran, Hadith, scholarly opinion, dictionary, logic, common sense, and common usage of the word “Ahlel Bayt.” Those who care to argue so vehemently against the verses of the Quran can only be those who hate the Ahlel Bayt so much and so passionately that they must even reject the Word of Allah.

The Shia accept Fatima (رضّى الله عنها) as part of the Ahlel Bayt, but we must analyze on what basis they do this. Do they honor Fatima (رضّى الله عنها) because she is the Prophet’s daughter, or rather because she is Ali’s wife? The answer, we hope, shall be made obvious: it seems to us that they do not honor the daughters of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم), but rather they only honor Ali’s wife.

The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) had four daughters, not just one. The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) and Khadijah had five children: Qasim (رضّى الله عنه), Zaynub (رضّى الله عنها), Ruqayyah (رضّى الله عنها), Umm Kulthoom (رضّى الله عنها), and Fatima (رضّى الله عنها). And yet, the Shia Ayatollahs will say that only Fatima (رضّى الله عنها) is part of the Ahlel Bayt. We’d like to ask why the other three daughters are left out? Unfortunately, it seems that in order to maintain consistency, many Shia clerics go so far as to claim that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) had only one daughter! This is an easily proven historical inconsistency, but it is trumpeted on many Shia websites, including the popular “Answering-Ansar” website. The Ahlus Sunnah love all the Prophet’s daughters equally and it pains us to see that the rights of three of our noble Prophet’s daughters are neglected. We wonder how our Shia brothers would feel if we said that Fatima (رضّى الله عنها) was not the daughter of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم), or that Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) was not the son of Ali (رضّى الله عنه)?
Every authoritative historical account affirms that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) had four daughters; even secular historians attest to this fact. We could provide numerous references here that would prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Prophet had four daughters. However, in such discourses one will always find individuals who will quote from sources which may be objectively declared dubious, but will be touted by one party to be authoritatively factual. The argument will, in that case, be reduced to a tedious dispute between “our word” against “theirs”. Therefore we shall attempt to prove our claim from the Quran, something which our Shia brothers will admit is an accurate source, as a matter of creed.
The Quran Declares That the Prophet Has More Than One Daughter
Allah says in the Quran:
“O Prophet! Say to your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers that they let down upon them their over-garments; this will be more proper, that they may be known, and thus they will not be given trouble; and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.” (Quran, 33:59)
Here, Allah uses the plural word for daughters, not the singular form. Allah uses the term “banaatuka” which means “your daughters.” If it was one daughter only, it would be “bintuka.” This completely negates the claim that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) had only one daughter. Had this been the case, then surely Allah would have not used the plural form, since Allah is above making grammatical mistakes. (We hope that the noble Sahabah will not be accused of doing Tahreef or tampering of the Quran!) We could provide more evidence to prove this fact of history, but it will certainly be a pointless endeavor if a Muslim cannot accept an evidence as ideologically authoritative as the Quran.
Why The Ayatollahs Deny Three Daughters of the Prophet
Let us return to the idea that Shi’ism originates from Abdullah Ibn Saba and his followers. Notive, how the Shia Ayatollahs do not care about the Ahlel Bayt of Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم). They only care about the Ahlel Bayt of Ali (رضّى الله عنه). Notice how the Shia Ayatollahs deny that the Prophet’s wives are part of the Ahlel Bayt, but Ali’s wife is part of the Ahlel Bayt. Notice how Ali’s children–Hasan (رضّى الله عنه) and Hussain (رضّى الله عنه)–are considered by them to be in the Ahlel Bayt, but the Prophet’s three daughters are not. This again leads us to confirm the idea that Shi’ism originates from the Saba’ites. These Saba’ites excessively praised Ali (رضّى الله عنه) and eventually even declared that Ali (رضّى الله عنه) was superior to the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم). Today, the Shia adamantly deny this and they say that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) is superior to Ali (رضّى الله عنه). However, we wonder why then they praise the Ahlel Bayt of Ali (رضّى الله عنه) and not the Ahlel Bayt of Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم)? Is this not a remnant of the Saba’ite origin of Shi’ism?
Another reason why the Shia Ayatollahs must deny that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) had three daughters was because two of these daughters–namely Ruqayyah (رضّى الله عنها) and Umm Kulthoom (رضّى الله عنها)–married Uthman Bin Affan (رضّى الله عنه), the third Caliph. The Shia Ayatollahs base their entire belief on the repudiation of the first three caliphs; if the three caliphs were really evil as the Shia say they are, then why did the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) marry two of his daughters to one of these three Caliphs? Again, this, in our opinion, questions the ideological foundation of Shi’ism.
The Shia revere the Nahjul Balagha, which they claim are the sermons and letters of Ali (رضّى الله عنه). It is one of the most sacred and authoratative of Shia books. The Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah believes that many of the narrations in the Nahjul Balagha are forgeries; however, the Shia accept all of it, and thus we will quote straight from the Nahjul Balagha to prove that Uthman (رضّى الله عنه) married two of the daughters of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم).
Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 163
Ali went to see Uthman and said to him:
“You have seen as we have seen and you have heard as we have heard. You sat in the company of the Prophet of Allah as we did. (Abu Bakr) Ibn Abi Quhafah and (`Umar) ibn al-Khattab were no more responsible for acting righteously than you, since you are nearer than both of them to the Prophet of Allah through kinship, and you also hold relationship to him by marriage which they do not hold.”
(Source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/163.htm)
This proves that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) had two daughters who married Uthman (رضّى الله عنه). This revelation is troublesome the Shia Ayatollahs it would involve exalting the status of Uthman’s family (رضّى الله عنه). And most importantly, it shows that Uthman (رضّى الله عنه) was such a pious person that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) gave him two daughters.
Al-Islam.org
The popular Shia website, Al-Islam.org, finally rescinded the Shia claim that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) had only one daughter. Let us see what Al-Islam.org has to say:
**Al-Islam.org **says
“Most reports (like those of Ibn Ishaq, al-Mas’udi) indicate that she [Khadaija] was the mother of all the Prophet’s children apart from Ibrahim (who was the son of Mary the Copt). She bore the following children to the Prophet: al-Qasim; Zaynab, Ruqqayya, Umm Kulthum and Hazrat Fatima (A.S). Bibi Fatima was the youngest daughter according to most reports. The daughters accepted Islam and migrated with the Prophet to Medina.
[RIGHT]source: http://al-islam.org/organizations/aalimnetwork/msg00083.html” [/RIGHT]

And we also read the following:
**Al-Islam.org **says
“Khadija, peace be upon her, was the first woman who believed in the Prophet’s divine prophecy. She put all her wealth at his disposal to propagate and promote Islam. [39] Six children were born of his marriage: two sons named Qasim and Tahir who passed away as infants in Makkah and four daughers named Ruqiyah, Zaynab, Umm Kulsum, and Fatima, who was the most prominent and honoured of them all. [40]
[RIGHT]source: http://www.al-islam.org/glance/4.htm” [/RIGHT]

It is distressing that the Shia exalt Fatima (رضّى الله عنها) by using the honorific “(A.S.)” as well as “Hazrat” but you will notice no such respect for the other beloved daughters of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم). Nonetheless, we are pleased that they accept the Prophet’s daughters. We kindly ask Shia-Chat and Answering-Ansar to follow suit and also rescind their claims that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) had only one daughter. How distressing it was to see an entire thread on Shia-Chat discussing how the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) had only one daughter. The Answering-Ansar moderator boldly declared: “The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) had only one daughter, Bibi Fatima [A.S.].”
The Shia website Al-Islam.org has definitively refuted those who claimed that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) did not have four daughters. We read the following:
**Al-Islam.org **says
“Khadija gave birth to several children of whom only four daughters survived: Zainab, Umme Kulthum, Ruqiya, and Fatima-Zahra who was the youngest and most exalted of them all.
There is a difference between historians regarding the first two daughters, for some claim that they were the Prophet’s step-daughters; but the fact is that they were his direct daughters. This fact will be explained in the coming pages, if Allah wills. [1]
[1] The story of Khadija’s marriage was summarized and carried on from Bihar al-Anwar: v.6.
[RIGHT]source: http://www.al-islam.org/gracious/5.htm ” [/RIGHT]

It should be noted that Bihar al-Anwar is a very authoratative book to the Shia.
We are pleased that Al-Islam.org has accepted the truth on this matter, and has admitted that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) had four daughters. However, we must ask then: if Fatima (رضّى الله عنها) is to be included in the Ahlel Bayt, then why aren’t the other three daughters of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم)? Is this not unfair? Is this not illogical?
Al-Shia.com
Another popular Shia website, www.al-shia.com, contains the following Hadith compiled by Imam Kulayni in Al-Kafi, the most reliable of the four Shia books of Hadith. All of the below Hadith confirm that Umm Kulthoom, Ruqayyah, and Zaynub are direct daughters of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم):
**Al-Shia.com says

  • روى** الصفار **بسنده عن الامام الباقر (ع ) قال : ولد لرسول اللّه (ص )من خديجة : القاسم والطاهر , وام كلثوم , ورقية , وزينب وفاطمة ((642)) .
    وروى الصدوق بسنده عن الصادق (ع ) قال : ولد لرسول اللّه (ص )من خديجة : القاسم والطاهر ـ وهو عبداللّه ـ وام كلثوم , ورقية , وزينب وفاطمة ((643)) .
    وقـال **الـكـليني **: ولد له منها قبل مبعثه : القاسم , ورقية , وزينب وام كلثوم , وولد له بعد المبعث : الـطـيـب والـطـاهر وفاطمة وروى ايضا : ا ن ه لم يولد بعد المبعث الا فاطمة (ع ) , وان الطيب والطاهر ولدا قبل مبعثه ((644)) .
    وقـال **الـشيخ الطبرسي : فاول ما حملت ولدت عبد اللّه بن محمد وهوالطيب ((الطاهر)) والناس يغلطون فيقولون : ولد له منها اربعة بنين القاسم وعبد اللّه والطيب والطاهر , وانما ولد له منها ابنان , الـثـانـي : الـقـاسـم , وقـيـل :ان القاسم اكبر , وهو بكره , وبه كان يكنى واربع بنات : زينب ورقية وام كلثوم وفاطمة ((645)) .
    وقال
    ابن شهر آشوب **: اولاده : وله من خديجة : القاسم وعبد اللّه ,وهما الطاهر والطيب , واربع بنات : زينب ورقية وام كلثوم وفاطمة وفي (الانوار) , و(الكشف ) , و(اللمع ) , وكتاب البلاذري : ان زيـنب ورقية كانتاربيبتيه من جحش فاما القاسم والطيب فماتا بمكة صغيرين , مكث القاسم سبع ليال ((646)) .
    وروى المجلسي عن الكازروني عن ابن عباس قال : اول من ولدلرسول اللّه بمكة قبل النبوة القاسم وبه كان يكنى , ثم ولد له زينب , ثم رقية ,ثم فاطمة , ثم ام كلثوم , ثم ولد له في الاسلام عبد اللّه فـسـمي الطيب والطاهر وامهم جميعا خديجة بنت خويلد وكان اول من مات من ولده القـاسم ثم مات عـبداللّه بمكة , فقال العاص بن وائل السهمي قد انقطع ولده فهو ابتر , فانزل اللّه تعالى ( ان شانئك هو الابتر ) ((647)) .

**
[RIGHT]source: http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/books/maws…0014.htm#link72” [/RIGHT]

As for our English-only readers, we have the following quote from Imam Kulayni (which is actually a translation of one of the above Hadith):
“He [the Prophet] married Khadijah when he was twenty and some years old. Before recieving the Divine Commands, his children born to him from Khadijah were Qasim, Ruqayyah, Zaynub, and Umm Kulthoom. Of the children born after he recieved Divine Commands were al-Tayyib, al-Tahir, and Fatima (a.s.)”
(source: al-shia.com, http://www.al-shia.com/html/eng/lib/)
Authority of Shia Historical Accounts
The classical Shia scholars never argued that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) had only one daughter. This was only a recent phenomena when the Ayatollahs realized that their position on the Ahlel Bayt did not make logical sense if the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) really did have more than one daughter. It is unfortunate that this policy of denial is a prevalent tactic of debate today. It is adopted with many other topics as well, such as Abdullah Ibn Saba; they deny his existence just like they deny the existence of the Prophet’s daughters. We would like to ask how it is that Shia historical accounts can be taken seriously when they deny such basic facts such as how many daughters the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) had and who Abdullah Ibn Saba was?
Such famous Shia scholars as Kulayni, Majlisi, Sadooq, Toosi, and Tabarsi have confirmed that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) had four daughters. Thus, when the modern day propagandists argue and say that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) had only one daughter, then we remind them that they are not only arguing with us, but also these classical scholars. This newfound Shia opinion is in fact 100% at variance with what the very founding fathers of Shia theology had to say, those who were the foundation pillar of knowledge for the later generations of the Shia.
Conclusion
It is a prevalent opinion of the Shia followers to say that the Sunnis dislike or are against the Ahlel Bayt. This is simply not true. We have just shown how it is the Shia who, in fact, deny the very existence of the Prophet’s daughters.
To us this denial is an insult and we kindly ask the Shia Ayatollahs to refrain from insulting the Ahlel Bayt of Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) by denying their very existence. We urge our Shia brothers to think about the veracity of their beliefs and what reasons they have for denying the rights of three of our Prophet’s lovely daughters. It is clear that, contrary to much of what is disseminated, the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah indeed loves the entire family of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم), including all his wives and all his daughters.

All Muslims believe in respecting the Ahlel Bayt. However, many Shia espouse a viewpoint that goes against the Islamic concepts of egalitarianism and is a rejection of Quranic exhortations. The Shia believe that the Prophet’s descendants will be automatically granted a high rank and status based on their familial connection to the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم). They believe that nobody can attain the rank of these “Syedis” simply because they were not born to the Prophet’s family, and this is why Abu Bakr (رضّى الله عنه) to them is forever inferior to Ali (رضّى الله عنه). The Shia say that the only ones who are allowed to be the Imams and leaders of the Muslims are those who come from the lineage of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم). It seems to us that it would not be an exaggeration to say that the Shia believe that the Prophet’s descendants are automatically superior to everyone else based on their lineage.

The reality, however, is that a person’s lineage and birth has no bearing on his rank and station on earth in the eyes of Allah. The only criterion which decides a person’s rank and station is a person’s Taqwa (piety). The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) spoke well of the Ahlel Bayt and Ahlel Kisa (People of the Cloak) not because they were related to him, but rather because these people had great Taqwa. The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) knew them personally and he experienced their dedication to Islam first-hand. As such, the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) could vouch for them. The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) also complimented his Sahabah (Companions), the Ansar (Helpers), Muhajiroon (Immigrants), and many other groups of people. When the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) complimented the Muhajiroon, he did not do so simply because they were part of a certain Meccan tribe, but rather because they had great Taqwa. The same holds true for the Ansar, the Sahabah, and anyone else.
The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) used Ahlel Bayt as a description to denote that these family members had great Taqwa. For example, if a person has a very pious uncle, he would say “my uncle has Taqwa; you should respect my uncle!” This does not mean that he has selected his uncle simply because he is a biological uncle, but rather because the uncle has Taqwa. Had his uncle been a sinful and distasteful person then he would have said that he has no relation to his uncle. Likewise, we are respecting the Ahlel Bayt not simply because they are related to the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم), but rather only because they had a great deal of Taqwa.
The Quran repeatedly holds each individual responsible for his or her own conduct. The actions of one soul cannot affect another, neither positively nor negatively. To do so would go against the egalitarian spirit of Islam, and would instead be a reflection of Jahiliyyah custom in which people thought they would be saved based on their familial connections as opposed to their Taqwa.
Quran
The Quran declares that on the Day of Judgement everyone’s familial connections will be cut off: “so now all relations between you have been cut off” (Quran, 6:94)
And then Allah says: “one soul shall not avail another” (Quran, 2:48) And again: “one soul shall not avail another” (Quran, 2:123)
The Quran categorically states that no soul shall have an effect on another: “no soul benefits except from its own work, and none bears the burden of another” (Quran, 6:164)
And again, Allah repeats it “that no bearer of burden shall bear the burden of another–And that man shall have nothing but what he [himself] strives for” (Quran, 5:38-39)
As well as: “that every soul delivers itself to ruin by its own acts” (Quran, 6:70)
Allah says “O mankind! We have created you from a male and a female, and made you into nations and tribes, that you may know one another. Verily, the most honorable of you with Allah is that (believer) who has Taqwa *[piety].” (Quran, 49:13)
**Hadith
*
The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) declared that people were born inherently equal “except by piety and good action (Taqwa). Indeed the best among you is the one with the best character (Taqwa). Listen to me. Did I convey this to you properly?… Each one of you who is here must convey this to everyone not present.” (Excerpt from the Prophet’s Last Sermon as in Baihiqi)
Islam came and destroyed this concept of hereditary rank. The Quran declares that people are created inherently equal and differ only based on their Taqwa (piety): “Verily the most honored of you in the sight of Allah is he who is the most righteous of you.” (Quran 49:13)
It is our hope that it has become clear that the Shia who believe in this are going against the Quran when they think that the Prophet’s family will be judged by another criterion or by a special lenience simply because they are the Prophet’s family, or that they will be automatically exalted based on something other than merit. They argue that Ali (رضّى الله عنه) had more of a right to the Caliphate than Abu Bakr (رضّى الله عنه) because he was related to the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) and the leadership could only be from a certain lineage of people [a concept not unfamiliar in the modern day context of the KKK and other discriminatory belief systems which raise people based on birth to a certain group as opposed to merit]. The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) has condemned this attitude in no uncertain terms, calling it nothing less than a remnant of the pre-Islamic Time of Jahiliyyah (Ignorance).
The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) said: “There are indeed people who boast of their dead ancestors; but in the sight of Allah they are more contemptible than the black beetle that rolls a piece of dung with its nose. Behold, Allah has removed from you the arrogance of the Time of Jahiliyyah (Ignorance) with its boast of ancestral glories. Man is but an Allah-fearing believer or an unfortunate sinner. All people are the children of Adam, and Adam was created out of dust.” [At-Tirmidhi and Abu Dawud]
The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) said further: “Undoubtedly Allah has removed from you the pride of arrogance of the age of Jahilliyah (ignorance) and the glorification of ancestors. Now people are of two kinds. Either believers who are aware or transgressors who do wrong. You are all the children of Adam and Adam was made of clay… If they do not give this up (i.e. pride in ancestors) Allah will consider them lower than the lowly worm which pushes itself through dung.” [Abu Dawud and Tirmidhi]
And the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) said: “The people of such and such a tribe are not my friends and supporters, rather my friends and supporters are the pious, no matter where they are.”
.
The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) said: “There is no superiority of an Arab over a non-Arab, or of a non-Arab over an Arab, or of a white man over a black man, or of a black man over a white man, except in terms of Taqwa (piety). The people come from Adam and Adam came from dust.”
The Prophets and their Families
After all, Prophet Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) was born of a family who were Mushriks (polythiests) so how can lineage possibly mean anything? Prophet Nuh (عليه السلام) had a son who was destined to Hell-Fire and his example is mentioned in the Quran, showing that not even if a person’s father is a prophet does this mean anything. Prophet Ibrahim’s father was a Mushrik and Ibrahim (عليه السلام) will disown him on the Day of Judgement. We see that ties of blood relation sever and the only real familial connection is through Taqwa. The Prophet Muhammad’s uncles were blood-related, but do we say that Abu Lahab and Abu Jahl will get any special privelage because of this?
People should not be accorded special rights simply because they were born to the right womb. People should be judged based on their Taqwa, not their birth. Bilal (رضّى الله عنه) was a slave, born to a slave woman, and today he is remembered as one of the noblest of Sahabah–despite his “lowly birth.” On the other hand, both Abu Jahl and Abu Lahab were from the same bloodline as the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم), and yet they are the two people for whom Allah has promised Hell-fire.
To take it even one step further: today, there are descendants of Abu Jahl and Abu Lahab who are highly religious Muslims, and will Insha-Allah enter Paradise. Would it be proper and just of Allah to limit the greatness of such people simply because they come from a certain stock, and not another? Then why is it that the Shia say such things against the progeny of Yezid, as if the progeny of Yezid had any say in being born of his loins!
The point is simple: who a person is born to should not decide his status in the eyes of Allah or in the religion of Islam. It should only be one’s Taqwa which dictates a person’s station and rank. This is why it is discomforting that the Shia trace Imamah via the Prophet’s bloodline just like a hereditary kingship. Why didn’t Allah Almighty simply make all the prophets to be like a hereditary kingship? He instead chose from amongst the people the best of character and the ones with the most Taqwa. Prophet Musa (عليه السلام) came from people who were slaves, and yet his rank was raised far above the king of the country, Pharaon. In the words of Martin Luther King: people should be judged based upon the content of their character and nothing else. This is what defines a person’s rank on this earth.
The Ayatollahs will oftentimes retort that Prophet Ibrahim (عليه السلام) asked for his progeny to be leaders. However, it should be noted that his sons were the ancestors of the entire Semite race and the only ones alive in the entire region. This argument is equivalent to saying that Allah chose Prophet Adam’s family (عليه السلام) and exalted them as leaders, and then using this as evidence against the idea that Allah judges only upon merit. Furthermore, we should all make du’a that our progeny is pious; this in no way means that we are saying our progeny is superior to the progeny of other people.
Prophet Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) is not the best because of his birth, but only because he was the best in Taqwa. And the Ahlel Bayt and Ahlel Kisa were complimented by the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) not because of their birth but because the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) knew of their great Taqwa. Why should the Prophet’s family be exalted just by virtue of being his family? Should they not be exalted for their righteousness, their piety, and their Taqwa?
And even if we take the view that the family of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) should be exalted above all others, then why is one section preferred above all others? Uthman’s father (رضّى الله عنه) was the Prophet’s second cousin, making Uthman (رضّى الله عنه) a nephew of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم). If the lineage of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) is to be exalted above all others, then why is Uthman’s side of the family (رضّى الله عنه) neglected in this adulation? If this is countered by the fact that Ali (رضّى الله عنه) was the husband of Fatima (رضّى الله عنها), the daughter of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم), then what about Uthman (رضّى الله عنه)? The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) gave Uthman (رضّى الله عنه) two of his daughters in marriage. Does that not mean that Uthman’s lineage (رضّى الله عنه) has twice the right to be exalted above Ali’s lineage (رضّى الله عنه)?No, this is contrary to the egalitarian spirit of Islam. Birthright does not mean anything. Only Taqwa does.
Syedi
Today, so many Shia claim to be “Syedi.” How exactly does one inherit the title of Syed? Just because the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) called one person to be Syed, this does not mean that all his progeny magically become Syed as well. The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) gave the title of Siddeeq to Abu Bakr (رضّى الله عنه); does this mean that all of his progeny are also magically Siddeeq (i.e. truthful)? A person does not inherit such qualities or titles, but rather he/she must work for them and strive for them with their own actions and deeds.
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid (رحمه الله) says:
“The idea that there are “sayyids” or “walis” (“saints”) whom Allaah has singled out from among mankind for some favour, or that they have a status which other people do not share, is an idea which is based on the Magian belief that Allaah is “incarnated” in people He chooses from among mankind. The Persians used to believe this of their kings (Chosroes), and that this spirit moved from one king to another, through his descendents. This Magian (Zoroastrian) idea spread to the Muslims via the Raafidi Shi’ah, whose origins are Magian – so this idea was introduced to the Muslims. This idea says that Allaah selects some of mankind, to the exclusion of others, for this status, which is the status of imaamah and wilaayah. So they believe in this idea with regard to ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib and his descendents, and they add other positions to that, such as sayyid…They said that as this sayyid or wali has this position and status, then they know better what is in our best interests, so we should entrust our affairs to them, because they are better than us, and so they are more entitled…There can be no doubt that this is obviously a misguided notion.”
And perhaps the greatest irony of all is the fact that many of the people who claim to be “Syedi” today are of Iranian or Pakistani ethnicity. How can these people realistically claim descent from the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) who was Arab? Their skin is not the same color as the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم), their facial structure is from another race altogether, and even their DNA would attest to the fact that they are anything but descendants of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم)! And why is it that we find very few people in Arabia who claim to be Syedi, and yet every third person claims this rank in Iran and Pakistan?
The unfortunate truth is that these Syedis are misguided. The reasoning is simply that the position of “Syed” is respected in these lands and “being a Syedi” is in vogue, while anybody can easily claim to be Syedi. We find that in Iran there are many Ayatollahs who claim to be Syedi and thus they are exalted because of this. In Pakistan, many of the “saints” claim to be Syedi and they are thus exalted by the incredulous people for this. Historically, the Shia leaders have exploited the masses by collecting Khums (religious tax) from their followers, all because they are “Syedi.” This is no doubt exploiting the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) and his family, all for materialistic gain.
It would be more accurate to say that Iranians are the descendants of fire-worshippers and Pakistanis are descendants of Hindu pagans. Likewise, most Arabs are the descendants of idol-worshippers, including the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) himself. The writer of this article is most likely the descendant of a Hindu pagan, but he does not think that Allah would judge him any differently had he been born to another lineage!
Conclusion
Indeed, to cogitate that the Ahlel Bayt or Ahlel Kisa are special because of their familial connection as opposed to their Taqwa is to, in fact, diminish the status of the Ahlel Bayt.
To conclude, yes we must respect the Ahlel Bayt and Ahlel Kisa. But this is not because they are born of a certain lineage, but rather because they had a great deal of Taqwa. We reject all those who claim to be superior based on their lineage.
Furthermore, anyone who is pious and a believer becomes family to the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم). Allah says in the Quran: “The believers are nothing else than brothers.” (Quran, 49:10) In Islam, family is based not on blood but rather on faith. We are brothers and sisters in the Deen, and if our blood-relatives are of another faith, then they are not family in the eyes of Islam; faith is the marker for who is part of our family. Those who convert to Islam and who are pious are adopted into the Muslim family.
The evidence for this can be seen by the fact that even the supposedly lowly slaves were declared to be Ahlel Bayt. It was narrated that Mihraan, the freed slave of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم), said: the Messenger of Allah said: “We are the family of Muhammad… the freed slave of a people is one of them.” (Narrated by Ahmad, no. 15152).
Anyone who is pious is included in the Ahl of Islam, the brotherhood and sisterhood of the Ummah. It is transmitted by at-Tabarani and al-Hakim that in one incident some people spoke very lowly about Salman al-Farsi. They spoke of the inferiority of Salman’s Persian ethnicity, and upon hearing this the Messenger of Allah (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) declared, “Salman is from us, the Ahlel Bayt.” And with that did the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) destroy the Jahiliyyah concepts of discrimination based on one’s birth. Suddenly, the Persian Kisra (King) became the most despicable whereas the lowly Muslim slave Bilal (رضّى الله عنه) became one of the highest in rank.
It was not the intent of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) to make a dynasty of rulers after him, nor did he mention this in any authentic report. On the contrary, the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) stated that the most eligible to claim a right to the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) are the most pious, regardless of their descent or the place they lived in.
The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) turned to Medinah and said: “Those Ahlel Bayt of mine think that they have the most right (to me) and it is not like this. Rather those who have the most right to me from amongst you are the pious, whoever they are and wherever they are.” [Narrated by Ibn Abi Asim 2/689 and Al-Tabarani 20/121]
In another Hadith, the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) condemns people of the future who would lay claim to power based on familial descent from the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم): “a man from the people of my house, who will assert that he belongs to me, whereas he does not, for my friends are only the God-fearing.” [Narrated by Abu Dawuud # 4230 and Ahmad # 5892 and others]
The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) has shown that the true relationship to him is that of piety and religion and not of biological descent. Had the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) indeed set a dynasty of rulers from his offspring, this would have cast doubt to the Prophet’s truthfulness and sincerity in conveying Allah’s word and then the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) would have been like other kings who were after this Dunya (materialistic world) and founded kingdoms with dynasties from their offspring. Indeed, the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) even forbade his progeny from inheriting wealth from him!
It is outside of our capabilities and inclinations to force people to leave concepts which the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) himself condemned in the strongest of manner, but it should be noted, however, that this method of exaltation will not be seen as something praiseworthy by the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) or his family, but rather they will view it as an abomination, much like a white person of good moral standards would find it offensive if someone else declared him superior simply because he was white. Most white people look down on Neo-Nazis, despite the fact that the Neo-Nazis are “praising” the white race. Likewise, the Prophet’s lineage will look down on those Shia who are “praising” them in such an exaggerated manner and based on criteria other than their merit.
Certain people may rationalize this discrimination by saying “Allah is God and God can do anything.” However, it is not God who is discriminating. Allah is clear in the Quran, in which He definitively states that Taqwa is the only criterion. If individuals decide to engage in discrimination based on birthright, then they should do it on their own accord and stop justifying it using Allah as an excuse. Thus, in our view it is unacceptable that the Shia reject the first Caliph on the basis of his lineage, and it is this bigotry that the Shia faith is based upon. It may be the case that this notion of discrimination was propagated by Abdullah ibn Saba and the Saba’ites, the founders of the Shia movement; ibn Saba was Jewish and he may well have carried over the notion of a chosen group of people, a concept of Judaism. This idea would then have been fostered by the Persian converts to Shi’ism who often came from Magian backgrounds.
We ask Allah to shower His Infinite blessings upon the Ahlel Bayt, the Ahlel Kisa, the Sahabah, the Muhajiroon, the Ansar, and the believing Muslims!

Re: Who are the Ahlel Bayt?

please make up your mind whether Shia'ism was started by Jews or Magians. Thats the problem with Nasibis, can't make up your mind.

yaar tum idhar udhar ki maat hanku, post on topic.

Re: Who are the Ahlel Bayt?

^yaar tum bhee itni lumbi lumbi pastes na maara karo, koi nahee parhta. Apni baat khud kehna seekho aur mukhtasaran kehna sekho. Shabash.

array yaar may nay sirf ayah-e-thateer ki tafseef post ki hay tafseer ibn kaseer say.

Re: Who are the Ahlel Bayt?

^parh kar oski summary/tashreeh aasaan say aasan lafzon mein likh diya karo, zyada behtar hoga.

will do next time.

tks

Alijan,

Do you even read your own Copy/Paste stuff? If you really want to play a copy / paste game I can refer you to the following websites so you can have more fun…

http://www.al-islam.org/encyclopedia/chapter1a/3.html
http://www.al-islam.org/encyclopedia/chapter1a/4.html
http://www.al-islam.org/encyclopedia/chapter1a/5.html
http://www.al-islam.org/encyclopedia/chapter1a/6.html
http://www.al-islam.org/encyclopedia/chapter1a/7.html
http://www.al-islam.org/encyclopedia/chapter1a/8.html
http://www.al-islam.org/encyclopedia/chapter1a/9.html
http://www.al-islam.org/encyclopedia/chapter1a/10.html
http://www.al-islam.org/encyclopedia/

Let me know if you need more links for copy / pasting?

it is clear in quran who are ahlul bait and i did not post any thing from any web site it is famous tafseer-e-qaseer (arround 700 years old).

could you please tell me where did quran used word “ahlul bait” other than wives.

show me any verse of quran which shows that ahlul abit are other than wives.

one thing more could you please explain ayah mentioned below since such ayah have same word which used in ayah-e-thateer.

(6. O you who believe! When you stand (intend) to offer the Salah (the prayer), then wash your faces and your hands (forearms) up to the elbows, rub (by passing wet hands over) your heads, and (wash) your feet up to the ankles. If you are in a state of Janaba, purify yourselves (bathe your whole body). But if you are ill or on a journey or any of you comes from the Gha'it (toilet) or you have touched women and you find no water, then perform Tayammum with clean earth and rub therewith your faces and hands. Allah does not want to place you in difficulty, but He wants to purify you, and to complete His Favor to you that you may be thankful.)

so, why do not you say person who perfomred wadu is also masoom.

The ayat you mentioned about appears to refer to wazu you do to be purify for yourself for prayers.... now read the ayat below:

And stay in your houses. Bedizen not yourselves with the bedizenment of the Time of Ignorance. Be regular in prayer, and pay the poor-due, and obey Allah and His messenger. Allah's wish is but to remove uncleanness far from you, O Folk of the Household, and** cleanse you with a thorough cleansing. [33:33]**

Read the text of the ayat above and tell me how it fits your context. Its talking about removing uncleanliness** far** from you and a thorough cleansing
Doesn't it indicate this purity is ranked quite higher than what you protray... i don't see a link... unless you want to come up with excuses to ignore the facts.

Read the following hadith of Sahih Muslim. It would tell you who ahley bait are:
Narrated Aisha:
One day the Prophet (PBUH&HF) came out afternoon wearing a black cloak (upper garment or gown; long coat), then al-Hasan Ibn Ali came and the Prophet accommodated him under the cloak, then al-Husain came and entered the cloak, then Fatimah came and the Prophet entered her under the cloak, then Ali came and the Prophet entered him to the cloak as well. Then the Prophet recited: “Verily Allah intends to keep off from you every kind of uncleanness O’ People of the House (Ahlul-Bayt), and purify you a perfect purification (the last sentence of Verse 33:33).”

Sunni reference:

  • Sahih Muslim, Chapter of virtues of companions, section of the virtues of the Ahlul-Bayt of the Prophet (PBUH&HF), 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1883, Tradition #

Now read the following narration in Sahih al-Tirmidhi
The verse “Verily Allah intends to … (33:33)” was revealed to the Prophet (PBUH&HF) in the house of Umm Salama. Upon that, the Prophet gathered Fatimah, al-Hasan, and al-Husain, and covered them with a cloak, and he also covered Ali who was behind him. Then the Prophet said: “O’ Allah! These are the Members of my House (Ahlul-Bayt). Keep them away from every impurity and purify them with a perfect purification.” Umm Salama (the wife of Prophet) asked: “Am I also included among them O Apostle of Allah?” the Prophet replied: “You remain in your position and you are toward a good ending.”
Sunni reference: Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v5, pp 351,663

The facts are all in your own books but now you want to fool around by coming up excuses show you stuff in Quran. Why don’t you start playing your game on yourself Please answer the following questions

  1. Tell me where in Quran does it say** how** to offer parayers?
  2. Tell me where in Quran does it say **how **to offer Hajj

Lets start with the basic before we move on.

If you want more references from your books following is a useful link for you. Please feel free to copy paste the whole thing
Who are Ahlul-Bayt? (Part I)