when should a "superstar" be kicked out?

When he does not perform for sometime? There are times when a “class player” is out of form, when a bowler can’t find rhythm, how long should we stick to that batsman/ bowler? We suffered badly in World Cup due to loss of Inzi’s form, bowlers not able to find rhythm.

Our highly over-rated bowlers are unable to find rhythm MORE often than finding one.

Shouldn’t we be rotating ANY batsman/bowler who looses rhythm/form after 2 (or some other number of) matches so we keep them on toes to perform it or have rest?

Re: when should a "superstar" be kicked out?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Captain1: *
When he does not perform for sometime? There are times when a "class player" is out of form, when a bowler can't find rhythm, how long should we stick to that batsman/ bowler? We suffered badly in World Cup due to loss of Inzi's form, bowlers not able to find rhythm.

Our highly over-rated bowlers are unable to find rhythm MORE often than finding one.

Shouldn't we be rotating ANY batsman/bowler who looses rhythm/form after 2 (or some other number of) matches so we keep them on toes to perform it or have rest?
[/QUOTE]

Good Idea and concept,

Unfortunately wont work.

Too much Politics in Cricket (In India as well as Pakistan)

Re: when should a "superstar" be kicked out?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Captain1: *
When he does not perform for sometime? There are times when a "class player" is out of form, when a bowler can't find rhythm, how long should we stick to that batsman/ bowler? We suffered badly in World Cup due to loss of Inzi's form, bowlers not able to find rhythm.

Our highly over-rated bowlers are unable to find rhythm MORE often than finding one.

Shouldn't we be rotating ANY batsman/bowler who looses rhythm/form after 2 (or some other number of) matches so we keep them on toes to perform it or have rest?
[/QUOTE]

-----x----
I thought that was the text book drill pakistan have been following so far
Mohd Zahid / Umar Gul / Shabir Ahd / Fazal-e-Akbar/ Junaid zia /
there is a line up already enough to put opposition on the toes as it is.
You seems to have short range sight upto your nose tip only.
You'r so lucky to have a far vision like this. All you have to do is to touch yr nose aur dedaar-e- cricket ho gaya :D

Re: Re: when should a "superstar" be kicked out?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Raindance: *

-----x----
I thought that was the text book drill pakistan have been following so far
Mohd Zahid / Umar Gul / Shabir Ahd / Fazal-e-Akbar/ Junaid zia /
there is a line up already enough to put opposition on the toes as it is.
You seems to have short range sight upto your nose tip only.
You'r so lucky to have a far vision like this. All you have to do is to touch yr nose aur dedaar-e- cricket ho gaya :D
[/QUOTE]

So Mohammad Zahid, Umar Gul, Shabir, Fazal-e-Akbar, Junaid Zia are all "super-stars" thats why they 've been sidelined because they have been replaced by "in-form" bowlers like Sami, Shoaib, Razzaq?

Re: Re: Re: when should a “superstar” be kicked out?

Mohd Zia – prone to injuries
Fazal- e-akbar - saw him in england , ironically too much swing was his drawback :eek: he should have been playing NZ aur Australia.
Junaid Zia - He’s still in the game I would grade him nxt to Akram soon
Umar Gul - will be fun to watch on English wickets
Shabir - Lankey predictable and orthodox bowler normal class ++

Pakistan probbly is the only side in the world who has such a tremendous wealth of youngsters waiting in the wings. a selector’s night mare I would say, I know wat I’m talking about :snooty: