When is rape not rape?

[diwana]

Re: When is rape not rape?

@el_topo

…

Dude, that sounds like emotional blackmail.

Hand. Tissue.

1- Will not comment on Assange case. That is court to decide and those who know the case better.

2- No it is not emotional blackmail. Not for those who respect the needs of other partner in marriage. It is the the pre-requisite of a marriage relation to care for each other.

Only those who think that so called freedom is extended so much that sex can be denied to married partner WITHOUT A LEGIT reason, will be emotionally disturbed by this.

3- Hand, tissue?

Don’t you think that is an insult to a married partner that other partner has to derive pleasure from these methods other than the partner himself or herself?

And then we sit here and ‘intelligently’ discuss why the cheating and divorce rate is escalating.

@Sehrysh

Goodness gracious me! I think people have forgotten how to read - I said keep the discussion mature and constructive - no slanging matches

@diwana - truth be told, your posts imply the following:

1. A woman must have been forcibly subdued for it to be rape. If she did not fight back then she must have consented.

Not the only pre-requisite. Many other evidences need to be presented or looked at along with this to conclude that a crime did occur.
2. The burden is on the woman to prove that she was raped, otherwise assume that the man is innocent because there are sooooooooo many case of woman falsely accusing men of rape. The rape must be obvious - anything that falls outside your narrow definition of what rape is could not possibly be rape.

**Yes. In the eyes of law, innocent unless proven guilty. **

Do you think EVERYONE who is accused definitely a criminal?
3. In a marital relationship a woman’s purpose is satisfying her husband - woe to her if she denies her husband.

You are putting words because of your bias. I said both are obliged. Not just the woman.

If this satisfies your bias then I can say: Shame on the man who’s wife comes to him with sexual need and without any legit reason he refuses and she has to find other means to get satisfaction. Happy?

Gotta say, you come across as a misogynist. But hey, if that floats your boat…

**So, if I present both sides of picture, I am misogynist? What kind of standard you have in yor mind? **

**You want to hear just one thing. “The man is guilty regardless what the facts may be just because a woman cries being a victim?” **

**If that floats yout boat then so be it. **

@Sara516

The same type of people who say marital rape is a myth created by so called educated modern women. :k:

Yes it is a myth. But that does not make me a ‘low class person’ who would bring someone’s relative or spouse in to discussion.

Seriously dude, underneath all the so-called “logic” and “reasoning” that you think only you possess, you’re still a jaahil with misogynistic and chauvanistic views.

**Already gave an answer for so called being a mysogynist above. **

I think you should know better than name calling. You have been a moderator. “Nuff said”.