Good thing nobody from the Status Quo is in the PTI.....oh wait.....
Status quo refers not to individuals, but to the system. Thought you knew that. There are plenty of good folks in status quo parties who want to change their party cultures but face internal resistance. Some leave, and some stay and hope for an eventual change. Guys like Saeed Ghani and Kaira in PPP are good examples. Hashmi was supposedly one in PMLN who left, but we can see what he turned out to be.
Status quo refers not to individuals, but to the system. Thought you knew that. There are plenty of good folks in status quo parties who want to change their party cultures but face internal resistance. Some leave, and some stay and hope for an eventual change. Guys like Saeed Ghani and Kaira in PPP are good examples. Hashmi was supposedly one in PMLN who left, but we can see what he turned out to be.
kia baat hey aor u key bat sey tamam blind followers mutafiq hon gey aor like bhi karein gaiey lekin un ko khud ko bhi is ka matlub samjh nahin ay ga
u seedha seedha likha her Ameer tabqa jo Ilzam khan k khilaf hey status quo hey aor jo sath hey woh pissa howa tabqa hey
Whatever floats your boat. Its awkwardly funny to see you sidestep the main issue every time an argument is made. As for Jasos above, the less said the better
Whatever floats your boat. Its awkwardly funny to see you sidestep the main issue every time an argument is made. As for Jasos above, the less said the better
No its because you constantly talk in double speak. Its amazing how many contradictory ideas you haev in your head and it makes no logical sense.
Your post:
*
[quote]
Status quo refers not to individuals, but to the system. Thought you knew that. There are plenty of good folks in status quo parties who want to change their party cultures but face internal resistance. Some leave, and some stay and hope for an eventual change. Guys like Saeed Ghani and Kaira in PPP are good examples. Hashmi was supposedly one in PMLN who left, but we can see what he turned out to be./quote]*
Your first sentence states its not about individuals. Then your next three lines focus purely on individuals, while referring to them as status quo parties.
I mean seriously which is it? Individuals or not? Simple question.
Your first sentence states its not about individuals. Then your next three lines focus purely on individuals, while referring to them as status quo parties.
I mean seriously which is it? Individuals or not? Simple question.
Parties dont stand in thin air. They are made of people, individuals. Hashmi chose to quit status quo because he wanted change. However in the end, he turned out to always have been standing in square one. Plain and simple. Just because you refuse to knowingly understand an argument doesnt make it contradictory, as you call it.
Parties dont stand in thin air. They are made of people, individuals. Hashmi chose to quit status quo because he wanted change. However in the end, he turned out to always have been standing in square one. Plain and simple. Just because you refuse to knowingly understand an argument doesnt make it contradictory, as you call it.
So the status quo does refer to individuals as well? Yes or no?
Mush was a traitor and standing against a traitor dictator is duty of every Pakistani
Supporting him was a crime .
What do you think makes him a traitor or dictator? He was a military man but majority of his actions were not of a dictator. Now, this doesn't mean I am supporting any dictatorship, but would like to get your views on this. How do you define a ruler as a traitor and dictator. What actions make him any of those?
So the status quo does refer to individuals as well? Yes or no?
It refers to a system. Individuals are a subset. Your interrogation techniques remind me of a certain news anchor, who has little substance, but a lot of counter questions which effectively brush the original issue under a carpet.
It refers to a system. Individuals are a subset. Your interrogation techniques remind me of a certain news anchor, who has little substance, but a lot of counter questions which effectively brush the original issue under a carpet.
Oh so now individuals are a subset. So PTI does have status quo people then?
I am just pointing out your hypocrisy and contradictory points.
I feel Pakistan is fighting with many anemies at a time .
India , Bombing at our borders
Musfsid Kuffar Taliban , attacking our people and installments
CIA , MOSAD and RAW trying hard to destroy Pakistan
PAT-PTI to destroy our culture , values , politics , traditions and relations
