whats your opinion about it........

“Murdoch-Bush-Blair perception management hoax: Be afraid, be very afraid.”
****Former NSA Official: Terror Plot Cooked ****by Bush Blair Mafia

Wayne Madsen Report | August 11 2006](http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/)


According to knowledgeable sources in the UK and other countries, the Tony Blair government, under siege by a Labor Party revolt, cleverly cooked up a new “terror” scare to avert the public’s eyes away from Blair’s increasing political woes. British law enforcement; neo-con and intelligence operatives in the United States, Israel, and Britain; and Rupert Murdoch’s global media empire cooked up the terrorist plot, liberally borrowing from the failed 1995 “Oplan Bojinka” plot by Pakistan- and Philippines-based terrorist Ramzi Ahmad Yousef to crash 11 trans-Pacific airliners bound from Asia to the United States. In the latest plot, it is reported that liquid bombs were to be detonated on 10 trans-Atlantic planes outbound from to the United States British and American authorities permitted a man with a liquid bomb to board a U.S.-bound flight in Heathrow on Aug. 6 – the pilot foiled secret UK-US attempt to hype an incident en route to or at Boston Logan. The London terror plan was “known” last Sunday by British and American authorities, according to the Indian press. American Airlines flight 109 from London Heathrow to Boston boarded a family of five, however, after the plane left Heathrow authorities determined that the father appeared on a British suspect list drawn up after the 7/7 London transit attacks. At first, the pilot was instructed to fly all the way to Boston where U.Sauthorities could claim credit for apprehending the suspect. However, the pilot, fearing for the safety of his passengers and crew, refused and quickly returned to Heathrow without informing the passengers. Once on the ground, it was discovered that the male had in his carry-on baggage the type of combination liquid explosive and electronic device now being hyped by the British and American media.
British sources report that the reason for the delay in informing the airlines and traveling public about the liquid bomb on the American flight was to maximize the beneficial political impact for Blair and George W. Bush, both plummeting in the polls from the situations in Iraq and Lebanon.
Earlier this week, two employees of Murdoch’s London tabloid, News of the World, were charged with hacking into the voice and text cell phone messages of three members of the staff of Clarence House, the residence of Princes Charles, William, and Harry. One of those charged with the wiretapping was Clive Goodman, the Royals editor of the News of the World. The same paper earlier tried to politically damage two anti-Iraq war British politicians – Scottish Socialist Tommy Sheridan and Respect Party MP George Galloway. The paper charges that was unfaithful to his wife by going to swinger’s clubs. He won a quarter million dollar lawsuit against the paper. Galloway was confronted by Mazher Mahmood, an individual who uses the moniker “Fake Sheik,” who posed as a wealthy Arab businessman and tried unsuccessfully to get Galloway to accept cash and make anti-Semitic remarks. In fact, Mahmood was and continues to be a reporter for News of the World, his continued employment approved by Murdoch. Goodman has merely been suspended by Murdoch but he has not been fired.
Murdoch uncovered Prince Charles-Gordon Brown plot to oust Blair. Phony terror plan cooked up to derail political coup plans
However, what prompted Murdoch and Blair to hype a new global “terror” threat was what Murdoch learned from eavesdropping on the phone calls of Prince Charles’ staff at the future king’s office, home, and limousine. The eavesdropping revealed that Charles was working with Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown, who is to the left of Blair, to conduct the same type of political maneuver that John Major used to oust Margaret Thatcher from office. London’s left-wing Mayor, Ken Livingston, was also in on the Charles-Brown plan and it was expected that in return for his support, Livingston would get a senior position in a Brown cabinet – a development that sent shock waves through the neo-con circles in London, Washington, and Jerusalem, including British Home Secretary John Reid and Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff. The Charles-Brown plan was briefed by Blair to Bush during the former’s recent visit to Washington. However, because the phony terror plot was known to both leaders – they decided to be away on vacation when the terror plot was “uncovered.” Bush is vacationing at his Crawford, Texas “ranch,” while Blair is on vacation in Barbados staying at Sir Cliff Richard’s luxurious villa After Blair met with Bush in Washington he flew to California where on July 30 he attended Murdoch’s News Corporation private corporate executive conference at the posh Inn at SpanishBay golf resort in PebbleBeach. Blair met with Murdoch, Israeli former Prime Minister Shimon Peres, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Newt Gingrich, and various Fox, Star, and Sky News executives. The final touches were agreed to by Blair and Murdoch on how the fake terror plot would play out in Murdoch’s media empire.
Airline terror plot cooked up by Blair, Bush, and Murdoch to save Tony’s political ass.
Blair told Bush that a Brown government would move to withdraw British troops from Iraq, break the “special relationship” with the Bush White House, and move closer to the European Union and the United Nations.
The Israeli attack on Lebanon created a rift within Blair’s Cabinet with some former Blair loyalists signaling their support for the political coup against Blair. As a result, a suspect passenger was permitted to board an American aircraft at Heathrow with a liquid bomb to lay the groundwork for the media and travel hysteria five days later.
Final touches on fake terror plot were agreed to by Blair and Murdoch at July 30 News Corp/Fox VIP meeting at the Inn at Spanish Bay inPebble Beach California.
The wiretapping of Charles’ messages also indicated that he has weighed in with various European royal families to discourage them from inviting Bush on state visits to their nations. This, reportedly upset the Bush and Blair regimes, who were working together to improve Bush’s image in Europe. The White House’s displeasure with the monarchies in [/FONT[COLOR=#003366]]Spain, Belgium, Sweden, Luxembourg, and Norway are a direct result of the Murdoch eavesdropping on Charles’ staff.
Murdoch-Bush-Blair perception management hoax: Be afraid, be very afraid.
Not surprisingly, after Galloway tore into a Sky News reporter on a recent televised interview, The Sun, a Murdoch paper, is now reporting that one of the 24 British aircraft liquid bomber suspects now under arrest, Waheed Zaman, met with Galloway “many times.” The paper quotes the sister of the suspect. A Galloway spokesman denies that Galloway knows the suspect. What is suspect is the Murdoch media empire that makes up news and commits illegal acts to provide cover for the false flag operations being conducted by Britain, the U.S., and Israel.
Pakistan’s Inter Service Intelligence (ISI) agency has helped provide the cover story for the alleged liquid bombers. Working with British and U.S. intelligence, the ISI says it broke up the plot after arresting terrorist suspects in Lahore and Karachi. However, the ISI claims that the men were affiliated with the Kashmiri terrorist group Lashkar-e-Toiba, a group that is run and funded by the ISI itself.
The disclosure of the Charles-Brown plot has already created a backlash from the neo-cons. The Murdoch media is already floating the rumor that Home Secretary Reid is now Blair’s chosen successor, while there will be an effort to scandalize Charles in an effort to convince the British public that it would be best to skip over him and have Prince William assume the throne upon Queen Elizabeth’s death or abdication.
British commentators are noting that it is Reid, a noted neo-con, who is chairing national security “Cobra” meetings in Blair’s absence. Blair bypassed Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott and many political observers believe that Prescott was passed over because of evidence that he was involved in supporting the Charles-Brown coup. Prescott chaired Cobra meetings in the wake of the July 7, 2005 (7/7) London transit bombings.
Meanwhile, Republican governors Arnold Schwarzenegger and Mitt Romney used the occasion to boost their sagging popularity by placing their states’ National Guardsmen at major airports in their states.
[FONT=Times New Roman][size=2]http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/](http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/)[/size]
[FONT=Times New Roman][size=3]__________________________________________________________[/size]

Re: whats your opinion about it…

:chai:

Re: whats your opinion about it…

I have already started a thread about it.
http://www.paklinks.com/gs/showthread.php?t=227016

Re: whats your opinion about it........

Published on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 by Craig Murray

*The UK Terror plot: What's Really Going On? *

by Craig Murray

I have been reading very carefully through all the
Sunday newspapers to try and analyse the truth from
all the scores of pages claiming to detail the
so-called bomb plot. Unlike the great herd of
so-called security experts doing the media analysis, I
have the advantage of having had the very highest
security clearances myself, having done a huge amount
of professional intelligence analysis, and having been
inside the spin machine.

So this, I believe, is the true story.

None of the alleged terrorists had made a bomb. None
had bought a plane ticket. Many did not even have
passports, which given the efficiency of the UK
Passport Agency would mean they couldn't be a plane
bomber for quite some time.

In the absence of bombs and airline tickets, and in
many cases passports, it could be pretty difficult to
convince a jury beyond reasonable doubt that
individuals intended to go through with suicide
bombings, whatever rash stuff they may have bragged in
internet chat rooms.

What is more, many of those arrested had been under
surveillance for over a year - like thousands of other
British Muslims. And not just Muslims. Like me.
Nothing from that surveillance had indicated the need
for early arrests.

Then an interrogation in Pakistan revealed the details
of this amazing plot to blow up multiple planes -
which, rather extraordinarily, had not turned up in a
year of surveillance. Of course, the interrogators of
the Pakistani dictator have their ways of making
people sing like canaries. As I witnessed in
Uzbekistan, you can get the most extraordinary
information this way. Trouble is it always tends to
give the interrogators all they might want, and more,
in a desperate effort to stop or avert torture. What
it doesn't give is the truth.

The gentleman being "interrogated" had fled the UK
after being wanted for questioning over the murder of
his uncle some years ago. That might be felt to cast
some doubt on his reliability. It might also be felt
that factors other than political ones might be at
play within these relationships. Much is also being
made of large transfers of money outside the formal
economy. Not in fact too unusual in the British Muslim
community, but if this activity is criminal, there are
many possibilities that have nothing to do with
terrorism.

We then have the extraordinary question of Bush and
Blair discussing the possible arrests over the
weekend. Why? I think the answer to that is plain.
Both in desperate domestic political trouble, they
longed for "Another 9/11". The intelligence from
Pakistan, however dodgy, gave them a new 9/11 they
could sell to the media. The media has bought,
wholesale, all the rubbish they have been shovelled.

We then have the appalling political propaganda of
John Reid, Home Secretary, making a speech warning us
all of the dreadful evil threatening us and
complaining that "Some people don't get" the need to
abandon all our traditional liberties. He then went
on, according to his own propaganda machine, to stay
up all night and minutely direct the arrests. There
could be no clearer evidence that our Police are now
just a political tool. Like all the best nasty
regimes, the knock on the door came in the middle of
the night, at 2.30am. Those arrested included a mother
with a six week old baby.

For those who don't know, it is worth introducing
Reid. A hardened Stalinist with a long term reputation
for personal violence, at Stirling Univeristy he was
the Communist Party's "Enforcer", (in days when the
Communist Party ran Stirling University Students'
Union, which it should not be forgotten was a business
with a very substantial cash turnover). Reid was sent
to beat up those who deviated from the Party line.

We will now never know if any of those arrested would
have gone on to make a bomb or buy a plane ticket.
Most of them do not fit the "Loner" profile you would
expect - a tiny percentage of suicide bombers have
happy marriages and young children. As they were all
under surveillance, and certainly would have been on
airport watch lists, there could have been little
danger in letting them proceed closer to maturity -
that is certainly what we would have done with the
IRA.

In all of this, the one thing of which I am certain is
that the timing is deeply political. This is more
propaganda than plot. Of the over one thousand British
Muslims arrested under anti-terrorist legislation,
only twelve per cent are ever charged with anything.
That is simply harrassment of Muslims on an appalling
scale. Of those charged, 80% are acquitted. Most of
the very few - just over two per cent of arrests - who
are convicted, are not convicted of anything to do
terrorism, but of some minor offence the Police
happened upon while trawling through the wreck of the
lives they had shattered.

Be sceptical. Be very, very sceptical.


Craig Murray was British Ambassador to Uzbekistan from
August 2002 to October 2004.

Re: whats your opinion about it…

Why the Terror Plots Are False

By Abid Ullah Jan

08/14/06 “Information Clearing House” – – There are
strong reasons to believe that Muslims are not
responsible for the recently unveiled terror plots
both in Toronto and London. To understand the reasons
why these plots are false, one has to begin with
himself and think from inside out. I would begin with
myself as a Muslim, who shares the beliefs that are
attributed to the alleged terrorists, but does not
feel compelled to even think about murdering innocent
civilians. Terrorists supposedly believe that:

a) The present world order is unjust. It is a
continuation of 700-year old colonial fascism.

b) The former colonialism has combined with new
systems for exploiting the natural resources of the
weak and maintaining full control of their political
systems through puppets.

c) The wars on Afghanistan and Iraq are illegitimate
and illegal.

d) 9/11 was an inside job[1] unless we see evidence to
the contrary or find answers to the long lists of
unanswered questions.[2]

e) Bush and Blair are neck deep in the blood of
innocent Muslims and non-Muslims.

f) Aggression and oppression should be resisted.

g) Muslims deserve the right to self-determination and
self-rule and should struggle to live by Islam, free
from colonial interference.

h) The dying British Empire illegally imposed Israel
on the local Arab population and took its land.
Regardless of any solution to the Muslim-Israel
problem, it is an illegitimate, racist state created
and sustained with the help of terrorism and racism.

Despite these facts and beliefs, and despite being
from Pakistan, I will never sacrifice even a dead cell
of my body, an ounce of my energy or a second of my
time in an act that will harm a single innocent
individual - let alone hundreds and thousands of
innocent civilians. The reason is simple: there is no
religious, moral, legal, logical or rational
justification for doing so. Even from the material,
secular perspective, there is absolutely no benefit to
Muslims at large from a few Muslims engaging in such
acts on their behalf.

Applying the same understanding to the men accused in
the recently unveiled terrorist plots, it is
inconceivable for a Muslim to believe that they had
planned to kill themselves and innocent civilians. How
is it possible that I could not find a single
Pakistani who was willing to take my book, The End of
Democracy, while traveling to Pakistan? Similarly, I
couldn’t find a single Pakistani who was willing to
bring a 1994 newspaper article about BCCI’s closure
from Pakistan to Canada.[3] It is really surprising to
see dozens of Pakistani Muslims who were willing to
plant bombs on planes.

Muslims who share the same “misplaced grievances,”
with the “Islamic-fascists” know from their personal
experience that there is much more than meets the eye
in the alleged terrorist plots.

These plots, even if they had succeeded, can never
benefit Muslims or Islam. To the contrary, it is
evident that these plots have neatly provided
Islamophobes and the so-called leaders of the free
world with a chance to remind us of their fight
against the “Islamic fascists”.

The idea of bombarding the public with news of foiled
or successful terrorist attacks is based on some
faulty assumptions. One assumption is that Muslims are
“nihilists” to the extent that against all logic,
reason and religious commandments, they are out to
kill civilians. The other assumption is that the
general public is stupid enough to ignore the
pronouncements from Mr. Blair that this is not a war
on terrorism or regime change but a war to impose
“value systems” on the Muslim world.[4]

When people in the position of Bush and Blair are
determined to change a way of life of 1.5 billion
people, and regard lying and killing thousands of
people as “collateral damage” for this cause, cooking
up a couple of fake terror plots are the most benign
acts on their part for a great cause. That is why it
would be hard for the architects of false and real
terrorist plots to convince both the Muslim and
non-Muslim masses that Islam, or grievances against
the West, or misinterpretation of religion, continues
to engage some Muslims in irreligious, immoral,
illegal and irrational acts of terrorism. This simply
doesn’t make any sense at all.

If radicalism or fascism means the belief of creating
a new order through terrorism, then the present-day
political and economic order in the West is the result
of such radicalism and fascism. Tony Blair’s idea of
imposing a “value systems” on 1.5 billion people is a
sign of fascism.

Historically, colonial crusades were based on the
belief that a wholly new world could be brought into
being by acts of terror. That is the sum and substance
of American, British and Israeli policies today. The
true precursors of radicalism can be found in the
earliest European movements to colonize the world. The
same approach resulted in the establishment of the
modern systems of political and economic oppression.
Any movement that resists this imperial order is
crushed with military force, and terrorism is used to
keep people, particularly Muslims, from challenging
the status quo.

Islamic movements for self-determination are neither
terrorist movements nor have they any resemblance with
the revolutionary terrorism developed in late Tsarist
Russia against a background of rapid change. That was
a totally different phenomenon with totally different
root causes. Cities were expanding; literacy was
growing; population growth was rapid; a new class of
unemployed intellectuals was emerging. Russia had all
the marks of a fast-evolving society. The dislocated
students who took to terror as a political weapon had
no clear objective or ideology either from the past or
for the future. Their view of future was extremely
hazy. They were more interested in the act of
destruction itself than in its supposed benefits. The
father of Russian anarchism, Mikhail Bakunin, summed
up this attitude in a celebrated dictum: 'The passion
for destruction is also a creative passion." For those
who acted on this slogan, terrorism was a triumph of
the will. Nothing of this sort applies to Muslims
struggle for liberation from the never ending
colonialism and puppet regimes in the Muslim world.

Some analysts argue that there are similarities
between comtemporary Islamic movements the European
revolutionary anarchism. Some analysts consider Al
Qaeda as an ‘Islamic project’ that tried to emulate
European revolutionary anarchism.[5] There is no
organized group in the Muslim world that behaves like
the late nineteenth-century anarchists, who targeted
public officials and used terror to achieve their
objectives.

Those who attribute terrorism to Al-Qaeda have no
evidence. The FBI has clearly said that it doesn’t
have any evidence against Osama for his involvement in
9/11. Osama swore on the Holy Qur’an to General Hamid
Gul that he was not involved in the bombing in East
Africa in any capacity.

There are hidden forces, most probably the
intelligence agencies of the U.S., Israel and
Pakistan, who coordinate and carry out these terrorist
operations to pin the blame on Muslims. This idea of
inflicting mass civilian casualties has more in common
with modem European revolutionaries than it does with
anything in medieval times or in Islam. The architects
of the false terror plots must stop their adventures
before these blow up in their faces, when no one in
the East and the West will believe any word from them.
Like other totalitarians, such as Hitler, they will
have no option but to go out first for blow up the
world that doesn’t agree with them, and later, turn on
themselves when they realize the impossibility of
transforming the whole world in their image with
terrorism and aggression.


Abid Ullah Jan is author of six books, including
“After Fascism: Muslims and the Struggle for
Self-determination.”

[1] 9/11 an inside job. See URL:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/inside.html

[2] See some questions here: UR:
http://www.icssa.org/9-11%20Questions.htm

[3] The article is available at:
http://www.icssa.org/bcci.html

[4] See Tony blair’s recent speech to the World
Affairs Council in Los Angeles on August 01, 2006.
URL:

and http://www.icssa.org/desperate_blair.html

[5] See for example, John Gray’s book, Al-Qaeda and
what it means to be Modern, New Press, London, 2003.

Re: whats your opinion about it........

All these conspiracy theories ignore one factor - Pakistan's prominent involvement.

Unless you're willing to actually believe that Pakistan is now part of a huge multinational conspiracy (to achieve what, and what does Pakistan get from it? ) , they allf all down.

Pakistan says that it provided the information that triggered the arrest, Pakistan says it's continuing to investigate and make arrests in Pakistan - in fact pakistan has arrested almost as many people in connection with the bombing as britain has.

All these conspiracy theories are focusing on the arrests in Britain and ignoring the arrests in pakistan completely.

Re: whats your opinion about it........

Whether Pakistan (or Musharraf rather) playing an Asian Blair for Bush or not, but one thing is coming into my mind that all these things are bound to happen. The emergence of Dajjal is near and one of his attributes will be that when he will speak the visible and known lies will sound like truth and people despite of their knowledge and doubts will start beleiving him. There are many resemblance in fitna-e-dajjal (and description of its era) and today's world and its technological advancements.

Re: whats your opinion about it........

Whether Pakistan (or Musharraf rather) playing a Asian Blair for Bush or not, but one thing is coming into my mind that all these things are bound to happen. The emergence of Dajjal is near and one of his attributes will be that when he will speak the visible and known lies will sound like truth and people despite of their knowledge and doubts will start beleiving him. There are many resemblance in fitna-e-dajjal (and description of its era) and today's world and its technological advancements.

Re: whats your opinion about it........

Whether Pakistan (or Musharraf rather) playing an Asian Blair for Bush or not, but one thing is coming into my mind that all these things are bound to happen. The emergence of Dajjal is near and one of his attributes will be that when he will speak the visible and known lies will sound like truth and people despite of their knowledge and doubts will start beleiving him. There are many resemblance in fitna-e-dajjal (and description of its era) and today's world and its technological advancements.

Re: whats your opinion about it........

Whether Pakistan (or Musharraf rather) playing an Asian Blair for Bush or not, but one thing is coming into my mind that all these things are bound to happen. The emergence of Dajjal is near and one of his attributes will be that when he will speak the visible and known lies will sound like truth and people despite of their knowledge and doubts will start beleiving him. There are many resemblance in fitna-e-dajjal (and description of its era) and today's world and its technological advancements.

Re: whats your opinion about it........

hahaha, GS hung for couple of minutes and then 4 posts instead of one :D

Re: whats your opinion about it........

There have been countless plots by al qaeda to bomb airliners and buildings. Many of them have been stopped, like this one, but they did succeed with one major plot on 9/11. Would these conspiracy theorists feel better if the attacks were not stopped beforehand?

The stated goals of al qaeda is to kill kafirs and creating plots to achieve this goal is not that unbelievable.

Re: whats your opinion about it…

Spoken just like a typical lamestream neo-con media zombie follower!
The biggest 9/11 conspiracy theory is the official story told by the government that 19 hijacker (7 of them are still alive and well btw) from caves of Afghanistan used box cutters to bring down 2 tower. How much more ridiculous it can get?

Re: whats your opinion about it…

I already talked about Pakistan’s involvement in these staged alerts conspiracy with evidence in my other thread. That’s what I wrote:

The information regarding the connection of Pakistan to latest London terror plot was known for month yet it was deliberately timed for public release. It was done on purpose to re-package the so called ‘war on terror’
When media released the information on terror plot soon after that ISI identified Rashid Rauf as “the link between the plot’s planners and British-based Muslims who were allegedly preparing to carry out attacks on transatlantic flights.”

Lot of people are not aware of this fact that Rashid Rauf is affiliated with Lashkar-e-Taiba and this group fully operated and funded by ISI and this is according to former National Security Agency (NSA) official Wayne Madsen.

So we are talking about an OFFICAL NSA guy (not some conspiracy nut) informing that Lashkar-e-Taiba is controlled and funded by ISI and ISI itself is nothing but a puppet of Al-CIAeda and MI6.
It shows that the mastermind of latest liquid bomb plot , Rahid Rauf was operating under the oversight and direction ISI and by proxy US and British intelligence.
ISI has a history filled with creating and protecting terrorist cells associated with a fact that ISI is known Al_CIAeda front. A revelation that Rashid Rauf is under ISI control is not a surprise. It makes perfect sense to conclude that entire pretense was cooked and organized by Neo fascists UK /US leaders and it was sold as promotional propaganda for the increased surveillance and control of UK and US citizens.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770

http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/

Re: whats your opinion about it........

errmmmmmm yeah can u ppl ryt less than this so ppl actually reed it.