Whats the honour in being last?

[chacha_Ghalib]

Re: Whats the honour in being last?

@Mirch

chacha,
We have firm believe that Hazrat Mohammad sal lal lah ho alai hay wasalam was the last prophet there will be no prophet after him , anybody who claims to be a prophet is a lier and has no firm belief on Quran, period .
You come from East or West or North or South to prove the need for a new prophet after him , it is not going to fly. As no logic in the world can shake our eman that there is Allah same way nothing can shake our belief that Hazrat Mohammad sal lal lah ho alai hay wasalam was the last prophet and there will be no prophet after him.

P.S: There is no need to answer this or give me any other logic , I am not going to budge.

okey…

I declare that santa clause lives up by the north pole and anyone who doesn’t believe in this fact is not a human and no matter what you say i am not going to budge

bhai mairy you also believe that anyone who says that there can be a subordinate prophet to Huzoor(saw) insults Huzoor (saw). Its this insult part that needs clarification, hence the thread. I don’t understand what the significance of this single fact (i.e. being the last messenger) is? the last law bearing prophet has an element of honour to it but just being last is in no way honourable. Now you differ with me on this and so i am asking what is the honour for Rasool Ullah (saw) in being the last prophet alone.