Now before people start jumping all over the place and fill the thread with copy and past, I want to clarify a couple of things. Please answer the question in two parts.
- firstly wots the honour or greatness in being last in anything. this part of the post does not need any hadith and doesn’t even need to be related to religion at all?
- secondly wot honour does being the last messenger bestow on our Holy Prophet(saw). Remember, as far as the everlasting book and shariat is concerned we have no disagreements. But specifically what is so great about being the last messenger itself which is taken away if a new messenger is sent?
If the ummah never went astray after Huzoor (saw) then the argument could be made that there is no need for a new prophet and as such Huzoor(saw) being last itself would have been an honour due to the fact that Huzoor eliminated the need for a new prophet. But that is contrary to non-ahmadiyya belif as well. If no prophet is needed after Huzoor (saw) then we don’t need one whether he be old or new. The fact that an old prophet will still be needed contradicts the no-need argument.
Again to eliminate any misunderstandings, the shariat is perfect and needs no replacement. Hence even you (the non-ahmadis) believe that whenever Jesus will come he will not replace the shariat.
There is honour in being given the perfect shariat and that shariat lasting till qayamat and being the best prophet and the best human being and future prophets being one’s ummati and such subordinate. But i don’t see any honour in the single fact of being last in the line of prophethood.