Do you mean that the PS3 has a better library than the PS2 or that a game that is on both the PS3 and the PS2, then the PS3 version would be better than it's PS2 counterpart?
If it's the latter, then I agree. If not, then I strongly disagree.
its the latter obviously....... PS2 took its time to became a legend hence it has a bigger library..... I guess it was launched somewhere in the 2000. whereas PS3 just came in the market for like couple of years...
its the latter obviously....... PS2 took its time to became a legend hence it has a bigger library..... I guess it was launched somewhere in the 2000. whereas PS3 just came in the market for like couple of years...
I was asking what he meant by it. I'm not talking about bigger library, I'm talking about better library. There might actually be people who prefer the PS3 library to the PS2's (or what they know of the PS2's library anyway).
Yeah, ps3 is still a newbie. Man, I remember the day games came out for ps2 max was like 30-40 bucks! Now for 360 and PS3 its like 50-70. Man..
Since when did new games for PS2 come out for 30-40? In general they were $50 at release. Even back in the NES/SMS and SNES/Genesis generations, I saw games that cost up to $70.
I am not so knowledgeable about this matter. So i have to learn it. Thanks for the post.
Thanks so much for sharing the post.
document internet management software property asset project](http://internetmanagementsoftware.org)find the right internet management software for you document internet management software property asset project](http://internetmanagementsoftware.org)