grades 3 through 12. That is throughout school. As for location, just state location and proceed.
Don't worry abt OPs intentions. They are irrelevant. Answer if you think the science curriculum needs changing.
Also some of the other questions posed cannot be answered. Pick a location, answer the questions u have posed wrt that location and go ahead with addressing questions in OP. Or not.
I stated quite clearly pick a location any location.
Let me add what I thought should have been clear. Pick a location whose curriculum ( and other details u asked for) you are familiar with. Unless of course u have nothing to offer.
1) As is? NO
2) More emphasis on Science? YES
3) Field trips to University science depts, national labs, industry?YES PLEASE.
4) Increased lab work? YES PLEASE
5) More access to computers for all. Including the poor public schools by raising our taxes? MOST DEFINITELY YES. ARE U KIDDING ME?
6) Less emphasis on Science and more on Creationism, Intelligent design.NO COMMENTS.
7) Inclusion of specific texts from scriptures as eternal truth which is not debatable. WILL YOU STOP?
8) Introduction of beliefs of specific religions that may or not may not be consistent with creationism of intelligent design. STOP. NO COMMENTS
9) Allowing religious teachings diametrically opposite to your religion. ENOUGH ALREADY
All opinions are welcome and are equally relevant and significant. THANK YOU
OP, thank you for this questionnaire. Always wanted to pose these questions to the gang. Please find my answers next to the questions above.
PS. Don't you think you overdid the list a tad? No offense.
also give religion a little break please.
If God intended to teach science with quran, he would do so.
If he wanted he would made us with few extra science processors in our head.
Just like if he wanted he could have made every one , one religion.
or one race.
How ever, when he talks about his favour upon men kind, he clearly mentioned:
Language
Pen
Human ability to learn.
Now if you take these three things out, where would humanity today.
I am sure, I would be sitting on tree, with wife picking up lice from my head.
So his plan was to give us basic tools, which other creation lacked.
3, 4, 5
relgion aur science ka kya taluq. Religion studies should be taught separate to science.
It depends.
Some topics such as how the universe came into being and evolution will conflict with religious beliefs. You find that so much with other topics in science.
Also, in faith-based schools, it's encouraged to connect core academic subjects to religion when applicable.
ek observation pesh karne ke liye hum aap se ijaazat chahte hai.
Aapne jo "when applicable" likh dee, aasha hai aap uske barey mein ruminate karein. Agar ijazat na mili, hum is observation ko turanth unobservable bana dete hain.
No that is ok too. It is a faith based school. Parents who send their kids probably want that. No issues.
I was trying to state that the "when applicable" works both ways. From the faith based Schools POV their charter is to make that connection. So I guess it applies.
For a non faith specific school, the when applicable gives an out. Cause to them the connection probably doesn't apply.
No that is ok too. It is a faith based school. Parents who send their kids probably want that. No issues.
I was trying to state that the "when applicable" works both ways. From the faith based Schools POV their charter is to make that connection. So I guess it applies.
For a non faith specific school, the when applicable gives an out. Cause to them the connection probably doesn't apply.
Bas yehi kehna tha hamein.
Yes, for faith-based school, it a part of their curriculum to make that connection. For public schools, parents may have to be notified by the teacher when "controversial" topics come up as they may conflict with religious beliefs.