What the World thinks of the US

America’s Image Further Erodes, Europeans Want Weaker Ties
But Post-War Iraq Will Be Better Off, Most Say
http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=175
Released: March 18, 2003

Navigate this report
Introduction and Summary
Additional Findings and Analyses
About this Survey
Questionnaire

Introduction and Summary

Anti-war sentiment and disapproval of President Bush’s international policies continue to erode America’s image among the publics of its allies. U.S. favorability ratings have plummeted in the past six months in countries actively opposing war _ France, Germany and Russia _ as well as in countries that are part of the “coalition of the willing.” In Great Britain, favorable views of the U.S. have declined from 75% to 48% since mid-2002.

In Poland, positive views of the U.S. have fallen to 50% from nearly 80% six months ago; in Italy, the proportion of respondents holding favorable views of the United States has declined by half over the same period (from 70% to 34%). In Spain, fewer than one-in-five (14%) have a favorable opinion of the United States. Views of the U.S. in Russia, which had taken a dramatically positive turn after Sept. 11, 2001, are now more negative than they were prior to the terrorist attacks.

Among possible coalition countries, majorities oppose joining the U.S. to take action against Iraq to end Saddam Hussein’s rule. Even in Great Britain, a 51% majority opposes war. Among the unwilling allies, there is also virtually no potential support for a U.S.- led military effort.

But ironically, most publics surveyed think that in the long run the Iraqi people will be better off and the Middle East will be more stable if Iraq is disarmed and Hussein is removed from power. More than seven-in-ten of the French (73%) and Germans (71% ) see the Iraqi public benefiting. Only in Russia and Turkey is there significant pessimism that war may worsen conditions in the region.

More generally, criticisms of U.S. foreign policy are almost universal. Overwhelming majorities disapprove of President Bush’s foreign policy and the small boost he received in the wake of Sept. 11 has disappeared. As a consequence, publics in seven of the eight nations surveyed believe that American policies have a negative effect on their country. Only the British are divided on the impact of American foreign policy on their country.

While critics of America’s foreign policies mostly blame the president, rather than America more generally, the poll finds strong support for the idea that Western Europe should take a more independent approach to security and diplomatic affairs. Majorities in four of five Western European countries surveyed hold this opinion, and a 48% plurality in Great Britain agrees. In the U.S., by contrast, 62% believe diplomatic and security ties with Western Europe should remain as close as they have been.

There is more of a consensus on both sides of the Atlantic about the continued importance of the United Nations. Majorities in the U.S. and Western Europe (except for Spain) think it still plays an important role in addressing global conflicts, despite the controversy over Iraq. That view is not shared in Russia and Turkey, and even in the U.S., where as many as a third see the U.N. as less important. Republicans, in particular, are divided about the continued importance of the U.N. More than four-in-ten Republicans (44%) think the Iraq crisis has shown it to be less important.

The latest survey by the Pew Global Attitudes Project interviewed more than 5,500 people in the United States and eight other countries from March 10-17. See page 8 for a full description of the methodology.

Oops.

Opps is right. If one believes that Iraq and the Middle East will now be better off and more stable due to the Coalition’s actions you would think that they would be supportive of those that caused the positive changes. Before the second world war countries didn't want to get involved in what was happening in Germany until it affected them, I suppose that is the thinking here.

ungrateful sons a… :hehe:

Force the ratings up by having a bake sale in Baghdad and donate the money to the analysts.

[QUOTE]
Originally posted by underthedome: *
**If one believes that Iraq and the Middle East will now be better off and more stable due to the Coalition’s actions you would think that they would be supportive of those that caused the positive changes. *

[/QUOTE]

i assume this poll was undertaken in March (it couldn't have been any later than that, i guess, because that's when the article was published). Maybe those individuals who had the more optimistic outlook in the time leading upto the invasion were not anticipating all the numerous problems that the people of Iraq would have to face subsequent to the invasion... and the lack of administrative 'supervision' the occupying powers exhibited. This is more striking when one considers the lack of control in the hospitals, the lack of protection afforded to diverse ministries (with the notable exception of one), the significant increase in vulnerability to water-borne diseases amongst young children, increasing tension between Kurds and Arabs playing out in terms of expulsions, etc etc. If individuals had been hoping for this invasion to bring about some benefits for the people of Iraq, the above-mentioned problems cannot offer too many permanent assurances.

That said Nadia, it's not the total civil war atmosphere that you feared, correct? Iraq is clearly not going to be a quick fix (a new military operation was launched just yesterday). Anyone who thought Iraq post-major war would be a cinch were delusional, thus those polled back in March would likely respond the same way today, assuming there rational (perhaps they aren't). A total Iraqi collapse would surly happen if the U.S. left now, those who call for the U.S. to leave care little about the Iraqi people.

[QUOTE]
Originally posted by underthedome: *
**That said Nadia, it's not the total civil war atmosphere that you feared, correct?
*
[/quote]

Well, no, you are right. It's not a "civil war".

The country is bleeding pretty badly, i don't know how optimistic we can get about that. Regarding calling for the US to leave - those who do so, perhaps also have an alternative plan in the wings (one that involves the UN) and not simply a call for the occupying powers to get up and leave. Handing over authority to the UN and removing their military forces is a viable alternative - infact, as i personally see it, the only act that would make sense right now.

Despite this, aside from the Europeans, the rest of the world still lines up at US consulates all over the world begging to be let in.

Public opinion is very fickle. And this poll was released BEFORE we even started the war with Iraq.

Frankly, I would rather be unpopular while beating the cr*p out of the terrorists and our enemies than to be loved because we've just lost a couple thousand civilians in a terrorist attack in our cities.

If it requires us being a victim to be popular, then screw it.

Something along the same lines as this thread - a BBC programme that aired this week (now accessible online):

What the world thinks of America, BBC

Andrew Marr, the BBC’s political editor, presented a unique broadcasting event confronting a critical question at the heart of the 21st century - what does the world think of America?

What The World Thinks of America, a special 90-minute debate, brought together 10 national broadcasters and a range of diverse voices from around the globe to give a multi-national verdict on the United States.

Hosted from the Cabinet War Rooms in London, the programme boasted a panel of quality thinkers, movers and shakers, including former cabinet minister Clare Short, US journalist Joe Klein and former Pakistani premier Benazir Bhutto - a seldom convened brains trust of world views on America’s pre-eminence.

Satellite links created a sense of global conversation, with input from leading broadcasters around the world. The debate also revealed the results of a ground-breaking, international survey of attitudes that captured popular prejudices and convictions about America.

There was a separate poll in the United States testing Americans’ grasp on their public image abroad. These findings gave a truly global perspective on American values, politics, leadership and popular culture.

Ever wondered what the US thinks of the rest of the world? Not much actually.

There are fascists, terrorists, Nazis, dictators, self imposed religious bigots, Anti-Semites, and then there is the Unites States. It took the US to defeat Japanese imperialism, and it took 10 years (and now look at Japan), it took 6 years to bring Germans back to decency. It will take a little while to defeat the present enemy too. Inshaalla.

In Poland, positive views of the U.S. have fallen to 50% from nearly 80% six months ago; in Italy, the proportion of respondents holding favorable views of the United States has declined by half over the same period (from 70% to 34%). In Spain, fewer than one-in-five (14%) have a favorable opinion of the United States. .

The greatest irony is that Poland, Italy and Spain are supposed to be allies of the US over Iraq, yet their fairly well off (and Christian) peoples have a largely negative view of the United States.

ev one knows and thinks that US goverment and US policies are full of crap...

The only interesting stat from this study was this one:

But ironically, most publics surveyed think that in the long run the Iraqi people will be better off and the Middle East will be more stable if Iraq is disarmed and Hussein is removed from power. More than seven-in-ten of the French (73%) and Germans (71% ) see the Iraqi public benefiting.

I see this as the beneficiaries of the Marshall Plan recognizing the parallels w/WW2.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Stu: *

I see this as the beneficiaries of the Marshall Plan recognizing the parallels w/WW2.
[/QUOTE]

Crumbs of comfort huh? They may well see a Vietnam-like parallel as to what will happen to the US occupiers in Iraq, especially the way US soldiers are being killed these days in Iraq?

[QUOTE]
Frankly, I would rather be unpopular while beating the cr*p out of the terrorists and our enemies than to be loved because we've just lost a couple thousand civilians in a terrorist attack in our cities.
[/QUOTE]

If attacking the wrong people is your idea of protecting your own people. The World is right to consider America a danger.

i think every super power and every great empire reaches itsd peak and then it has to wane and thats exactly whats going to happen to usa in the comming years
the people of usa live in thier own world most of them are not aware whether iraq is in asia or africa. and they dont realise how unpopular they are in rest of the world.
i thinks its the begining of the end of the mighty
just as it happened to the roman empire, the mughal empire , alexander
and history has plenty of them

It was fun watching Bhutto discussing poverty in Pakistan. What a comedian.

the whole world does’nt like the US except israel what a surprise!

And Bush is considered the most ignorant leader since ronald regan :konfused:

i have been watching american media ever since presidential elections took place
bush was called moron by the american people and most talk show hosts favorite joker was dubya .
9/11 pushed american people to wall adn they made this moron into a hero cause they had no choice and bush who also watched tv like to rest of americans do knew too well that he was going to be the most laughable president ever 9/11 gave him a opportunity to do a image change
how many americans agree with me? be honest