For those who were excepting some joke, sorry to disappoint.
http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif
Here’s a screen capture of a beta build of Windows XP:
http://www.pcworld.com/news/graphics/45271-n_032201_xpprev2smb.jpg
For those who were excepting some joke, sorry to disappoint.
http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif
Here’s a screen capture of a beta build of Windows XP:
http://www.pcworld.com/news/graphics/45271-n_032201_xpprev2smb.jpg
I have been running XP (Whistler) beta on two of my Lab PCs. I am totally undecided. Technologically, it’s a leap. Performance is poor. The ability to choose your own skins is great. Integration is awesome. But, I think I am going to wait till 2003!
looks nice dun it??
http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif
I’ll stick with win2k for a while i guess
http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif
Found it the best so far
BTW what are the min requirements for it??
Azkar, I'm sure that performance will improve after the debugging code is removed from the final release.
who-me, I think its 300MHz w/ 128MB and 1 GB of free space. Minimum requirements, mind you!
looks like windows(cinderella) going to the prince's ball......features peh raushni daali jayay!
interesting one …
Looks awsome ! .. But hmm.. i wonder if its too heavy on 500 MHz ?!?
http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/confused.gif
~ As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality. --Albert Einstein ~
[quote]
Originally posted by Slider19:
**Azkar, I'm sure that performance will improve after the debugging code is removed from the final release.
who-me, I think its 300MHz w/ 128MB and 1 GB of free space. Minimum requirements, mind you!**
[/quote]
Naah dun have a spare computer that powerful..... oh well
Actually the skins thing is based on XML, so it won't be as 'heavy' on your processor as it looks!
And by the way, there are going to be two versions, one for the home user and the other for professionals. I guess I'll finally upgrade from my Win98 to this baby... and I won't have to run WindowsBlinds to make it look cool!!!
I hate signatures.
This is nothing for who—me, with just the recycle bin on the desktop…??? innit…???
http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/hehe.gif
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/home/images/startbar.jpg
I would install it and make a Dual/Tri boot system, like now ( winMe+Win2k)…
Although not too keen on the this MS Graphical wonder kid of…
http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/hoonh.gif
I was also never so keen on skins for Windows… All those programs take away some or a few of the functions, but coz this is a built-in fucntion in XP… So I will surely give it a try.
[This message has been edited by Gizzy (edited April 16, 2001).]
If it’s more stable then Win98SE, then I’m surely going to move. I’m glad they’re finally moving to pure 32-bit architecture.
But, anything should be better then WinME.